Study of Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure
STAR
Superiority Trial of Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure Versus Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Authors hypothesize that aortic root reimplantation procedure is superior over standard aortic valve reimplantation procedure in the incidence of aortic valve replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 10, 2019
CompletedJune 10, 2019
March 1, 2019
4.9 years
January 30, 2013
September 7, 2017
March 10, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Freedom From Aortic Insufficiency More Than 2+ (Percentage, Kaplan-Meier)
Estimated percentage of participants free from aortic insufficiency (AI) more than 2+ measured by echocardiography for a 4 years after treatment..
up to 4 yeras
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Survival (Percentage, Kaplan-Meier)
up to 4 yeras
Study Arms (2)
Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAortic Root Reimplantation Procedure
Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure
Interventions
Modified Florida Sleeve.
David I
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aortic insufficiency 2+
- Ascending aorta or aortic root of greater than 4.5 cm (\> 4.0 cm in Marfan syndrome)
- Good conditions of aortic cusps
You may not qualify if:
- Aortic annulus more than 32 mm
- Aortic cusps destruction
- Critical aortic cusps elongation
- Aortic root dissection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Meshalkin State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia
Related Publications (2)
Alexander Chernyavskiy, Sergey Alsov, Dmitry Khvan, Dmitry Sirota. Extravalvular exoprosthetic repair of aortic root: first experience. Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2012; 9 (4): 409-414 DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2012.32675
RESULTЧернявский А. М., Хван Д. С., Альсов С. А., Сирота Д. А., Ляшенко М. М. Результаты реимплантации корня аорты в протез у пациентов с аневризмой восходящего отдела аорты и недостаточностью аортального клапана. Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2015;19(4):38-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-4-38-47
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dmitry
- Organization
- MeshalkinRI
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- cardiac surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2013
First Posted
February 8, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 20, 2015
Study Completion
November 20, 2015
Last Updated
June 10, 2019
Results First Posted
June 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03