Serious Illness Communication Project
1 other identifier
interventional
994
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of implementing a "Serious Illness Conversation Guide" to guide patient/family-clinician discussions and planning about end-of-life care decisions. The goal of the intervention is to improve achievement of patient care priorities and peacefulness at the end of life for patients with serious and life-threatening illness and their families. We hypothesize that patients whose physician is trained to use and adheres to the elements of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide will demonstrate enhanced consistency between documented key priorities and care received, and will experience greater peace in the final month of life; similarly, their families will experience higher satisfaction with care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 22, 2019
January 1, 2019
4 years
August 7, 2012
January 17, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Enhanced goal-consistent care
Patients whose physician is trained to use and adheres to the SICG will receive care that is more consistent with their key life priorities during the last week and the last 3 months of life than patients whose physician is not trained to use the SICG. Goal consistent care will be measured by comparing goals identified by the patient during the final 3 months and final week of life, to care received by the patient, which will be measured by chart review and family report. For each priority/goal listed by the patient as important, we will give a score from 0 to 3 to quantify the extent to which that goal was achieved by the patient. Higher overall score will show more goal-consistent care.
up to 2 years
PEACE
Patients whose physician is trained to use and adheres to the SICG will be more likely to report being at peace in the final 3 months of life than patients whose physician is not trained to use the SICG. Being at peace will be measured by the PEACE scale, a 13-item validated questionnaire in cancer patients.
up to 2 years
Study Arms (3)
Trained Clinicians
EXPERIMENTALClinicians randomized into this group will receive training in using the Serious Illness Conversation Guide with their patients. Patients of these clinicians will also be in the intervention arm.
Non-trained Clinicians
NO INTERVENTIONClinicians randomized into this group will not receive training in using the Serious Illness Conversation Guide with their patients. They will provide usual care. Patients of these clinicians will also be in the control arm.
Non-volunteer Clinicians
NO INTERVENTIONThese clinicians do not agree to participate in the study. They will continue to provide usual care. Their patients will be invited to participate and be followed.
Interventions
1. Initial Training: The training program for clinicians randomized into the intervention arm will be 2.5 hours. The project will be introduced and the Serious Illness Conversation Guide shared. The training session will include a brief didactic session on "Challenges in discussing advance care planning/values and goals" followed by practice using the SICG. 2. Coaching and Feedback: We will also provide individual coaching for clinicians. Clinicians will be able to contact the study doctor to request coaching/debriefing on a challenging case; one of the investigators will respond within 24-48 hours for urgent or distressing cases (up to 72 hours on weekends). In-the-moment coaching will be by telephone or in person.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute medical oncology clinician
- Care for patients with selected high-risk cancers
You may not qualify if:
- DFCI Gynecology-Oncology specialist
- Seeing patients only in the Phase I clinical trial disease center
- Over 18 years of age
- English speaker
- Patient at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, including satellite sites at Milford Regional Medical Center and South Shore Hospital
- Diagnosis of one of the following high mortality or advanced cancers: breast, gastric, intestinal, esophageal, pancreatic, biliary, colorectal, hepatocellular, head and neck, renal, bladder, prostate, acute myeloid lymphoma (AML), acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL), lymphoma, melanoma, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), sarcoma, and lung.
- Ability to provide consent
- Diagnosis of advanced obstetric-gynecological cancer
- Cognitive impairment
- Over 18 years of age
- English speaker
- Friend or family member of study patient (Health care proxy, or close friend or family member who is involved in helping the patient think about decisions related to their health care)
- Ability to provide consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institutelead
- Partners HealthCarecollaborator
- Charina Endowment Fundcollaborator
- Margaret T. Morris Foundationcollaborator
- Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)collaborator
- Brigham and Women's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Related Publications (4)
Paladino J, Koritsanszky L, Nisotel L, Neville BA, Miller K, Sanders J, Benjamin E, Fromme E, Block S, Bernacki R. Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis. Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4550-4560. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3102. Epub 2020 May 4.
PMID: 32363775DERIVEDBernacki R, Paladino J, Neville BA, Hutchings M, Kavanagh J, Geerse OP, Lakin J, Sanders JJ, Miller K, Lipsitz S, Gawande AA, Block SD. Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):751-759. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0077.
PMID: 30870563DERIVEDPaladino J, Bernacki R, Neville BA, Kavanagh J, Miranda SP, Palmor M, Lakin J, Desai M, Lamas D, Sanders JJ, Gass J, Henrich N, Lipsitz S, Fromme E, Gawande AA, Block SD. Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of the Serious Illness Care Program. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):801-809. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0292.
PMID: 30870556DERIVEDBernacki R, Hutchings M, Vick J, Smith G, Paladino J, Lipsitz S, Gawande AA, Block SD. Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 6;5(10):e009032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009032.
PMID: 26443662DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rachelle Bernacki, MD, MS
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Atul Gawande, MD, MPH
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Block, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2012
First Posted
February 8, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01