A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Polyethylene Glycol and Sodium Picosulphate With Magnesium Citrate
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adequate bowel cleansing is important for a completeness of colonoscopy and detection of colon polyps. Inadequate bowel preparation leads to longer duration of colonoscopy and obscured mucosal visualization resulting in missed lesions. Bowel cleansing agents are simply classified into the large volume, iso-osmotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) based solutions or the small volume osmotically active agents, such as sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC). There are rare reports that compare directly conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution and sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) for bowel preparation in korea. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different regimens of SPMC and PEG solution.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Jul 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2013
CompletedJanuary 31, 2013
January 1, 2013
4 months
January 25, 2013
January 29, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the quality of the bowel preparation using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (OBPS)
Immediately following the colonoscopy, the endoscopist who were unaware of the preparation regimen scored the quality of the bowel preparation using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (OBPS).
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Completeness of the bowel preparation
30 minutes before the colonoscopy
the patient's tolerability
30 minutes before the colonoscopy
the side effects of the sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate
1 hour before the colonoscopy
Study Arms (4)
Same day PEG
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup 1 (same day PEG, N=50) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy
split PEG
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup 2 (split PEG, N=50) received 2 L of PEG at 6:00 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and 2 L of PEG at 4-6 hours before procedure
SPMC 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup 3 (SPMC 2, N=50) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure
SPMC 3
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup 4 (SPMC 3, N=50) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m and the other sachet at 9 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet at 4-6 hours before procedure.
Interventions
-group 1 (same day PEG) received 4 L of PEG at 6 hours before procedure on the day of the colonoscopy
-group 3 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 6 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 4-6 hours before procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients, aged between18 and 75 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study
You may not qualify if:
- gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, severe uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, previous colorectal resection, congestive heart failure, recent acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, renal insufficiency with glomerular filtration rate \< 60 ml/minute/1.73 m2, liver cirrhosis or ascites, pregnancy, lactation, and history of hypersensitivity to any bowel cleansing agents.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine
Seoul, ASI|KR|KS013|SEOUL, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yoon Tae Jeen
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eun Sun Kim
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Woo Jin Lee
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2013
First Posted
January 29, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 31, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-01