Image Content Analysis of Dural-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography
Comparison of Image Content Assessment Between Dural-axis Rotational and Standard Coronary Angiography
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesized that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography was non-inferior to standard coronary angiography with respect to diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedJune 30, 2015
June 1, 2015
4 months
January 16, 2013
June 27, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease
The number of patients diagnosed as coronary heart disease by either angiographic modality by two blinded independent reviewers are recorded. The single criterion for diagnosis of coronary heart disease is the presence of coronary artery stenoses greater than or equal to 50%.
After coronary angiography, an expected average of 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Coronary Lesion Assessment
After coronary angiography, an expected average of 1 month
Quantitative Coronary Angiography
After coronary angiography, an expected average of 1 month
Diagnostic Screening Adequacy
After coronary angiography, an expected average of 1 month
Other Outcomes (1)
Safety Analysis
During coronary angiography
Study Arms (1)
Coronary Angiography
OTHERPatient first undergo standard coronary angiography(SA) of either left or right coronary system followed by dual-axis rotational coronary angiography(DARCA). The SA protocol consist of six different projections (right anterior oblique (RAO)-caudal, RAO-cranial (CRA), left anterior oblique (LAO)-CRA, LAO-caudal (CAU), antero-posterior (AP)-CRA and AP-CAU) for left coronary artery (LCA) and two projections (LAO and AP-cranial) for right coronary artery (RCA). The DARCA protocol consist of two coronary acquisitions specified by the protocol: one for LCA (Swing LCA CRA 35 5.8s), another for RCA (Swing RCA AP 4.0s).
Interventions
Coronary angiography include standard coronary angiography (SA) and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA). Patient first undergo SA of either left or right coronary system followed by DARCA.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age\>18 years old, \<80 years old
- a clinical indication for diagnostic coronary angiography to evaluate possible coronary artery disease
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast
- Patients who had received iodinated contrast material within the last week or were unable to give consent
- Renal insufficiency (\>1.5mg/dL)
- Acute myocardial infarction within one week
- Cardiogenic shock
- heart function worse than New York Heart Association functional class III
- Left main coronary artery disease
- Prior coronary artery bypass graft treatment
- Prior percutaneous coronary intervention treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
Beijing, 100039, China
Related Publications (4)
Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):753-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21918.
PMID: 19180661BACKGROUNDKlein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):820-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22804. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
PMID: 20853352BACKGROUNDLiu HL, Jin ZG, Yang SL, Luo JP, Ma DX, Liu Y, Han W. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Mar;125(6):1016-22.
PMID: 22613524BACKGROUNDJin ZG, Bai R, Li Y, Yang Y, Han W, Zhao Q, Zhang L, Liu HL. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;36(2):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01711-9. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
PMID: 31628576DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Liu Huiliang, M.D.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jin Zhigeng, M.M.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yang Shengli, M.D.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luo Jianping, M.M.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ma Dongxing, M.D.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liu Ying, M.M.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Han Wei, M.D.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jing Limin, B.S.M.
General hospital of Chinese people's armed police forces
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2013
First Posted
January 28, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06