Safety and Efficacy Study of Dual-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography
Randomized Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Dual-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography
1 other identifier
observational
576
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by directly comparing it to standard coronary angiography (SA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedJune 8, 2015
June 1, 2015
1.1 years
June 13, 2012
June 3, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical safety of the patient during coronary angiography(CA)
The patients were closely observed and questioned regarding discomfort and adverse events during or immediately after CA. The sensation of warmth or pain, including chest pain, is considered as discomfort. Adverse events include arrhythmias, hemodynamic compromise, chest pain described as angina-like pain and any untoward event which jeopardises the patient's life or prolongs the planned hospital stay. If patients experienced bradycardia, only bradycardia with a decrease in heart rate of 20% from the baseline was counted. Hemodynamic compromise was defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure by \> 20 mmHg to \< 90 mmHg.
At time of CA
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient safety determined by contrast and radiation dose
At time of CA
Clinical utility of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography(DARCA)
At time of CA
Study Arms (2)
SA group
Patients using SA for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease are assigned to the SA group.
DARCA group
Patients using DARCA for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease are assigned to the DARCA group.
Interventions
Using standard coronary angiography (SA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Using dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography at the General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces.
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years old
- A clinical indication for diagnostic coronary angiography to evaluate possible CAD
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast
- Renal insufficiency (\>1.5mg/dL)
- Cardiogenic shock
- Acute myocardial infarction within one week
- Prior coronary artery bypass graft treatment
- Prior percutaneous coronary intervention treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100039, China
Related Publications (7)
Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):753-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21918.
PMID: 19180661BACKGROUNDMaddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jun;62(2):167-74. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20036.
PMID: 15170705BACKGROUNDEmpen K, Kuon E, Hummel A, Gebauer C, Dorr M, Konemann R, Hoffmann W, Staudt A, Weitmann K, Reffelmann T, Felix SB. Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography. Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):552-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.011.
PMID: 20826266BACKGROUNDGomez-Menchero AE, Diaz JF, Sanchez-Gonzalez C, Cardenal R, Sanghvi AB, Roa-Garrido J, Rodriguez-Lopez JL. Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012 May;65(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Apr 1. English, Spanish.
PMID: 22465608BACKGROUNDGrech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, Fenech A, Grech V. A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct 1;80(4):576-80. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23415. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
PMID: 22105940BACKGROUNDKlein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):820-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22804. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
PMID: 20853352RESULTLiu HL, Jin ZG, Yang SL, Luo JP, Ma DX, Liu Y, Han W. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Mar;125(6):1016-22.
PMID: 22613524RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Liu Huiliang, M.D.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jin Zhigeng, M.M.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luo Jianping, M.M.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yang Shengli, M.D.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ma Dongxing, M.D.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liu Ying, M.M.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Han Wei, M.D.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jing Limin, B.S.M.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2012
First Posted
June 21, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 8, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06