NCT01774214

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine which of two commonly used methods of manual pediatric fluid resuscitation (The "Push-Pull Technique" vs. the "Disconnect-Reconnect Technique") allows for the most rapid administration of normal saline when this is urgently required.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

October 29, 2013

Status Verified

October 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

January 19, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 26, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

ResuscitationShockFluid TherapyPediatrics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall fluid infusion rate

    Start Intervention Time is defined as the time that the model begins to effectively receive normal saline as administered by the participant, determined by the time at which fluid begins to collect in the graduated cylinder. End Intervention Time is defined as the time at which the model ceases to effectively receive further normal saline as determined by the time at which fluid stops collecting in the graduated cylinder. All testing will be videorecorded, with video reviews conducted by two independent and blinded outcome assessors using strict criteria to determine total intervention time (Total intervention time = end intervention time - start intervention time). At the time of subject testing, the research assistant will also record the total amount of normal saline collected in the graduated cylinder at the end of the intervention. Total intervention rate (mL/s) = volume of normal saline collected/Total intervention time.

    From Date of Subject Randomization until Date Intervention Completed (Day 1)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Accuracy of fluid volume delivery

    From Date of Subject Randomization until Date Intervention Completed (Day 1)

  • Catheter dislodgement event while performing the intervention

    From Date of Subject Randomization until Date Intervention Completed (Day 1)

  • Self-reported fatigue

    From Date of Subject Randomization until Date Intervention Completed (Day 1)

  • Fluid infusion rates for each of the three sequential fluid boluses

    From Date of Subject Randomization until Date Intervention Completed (Day 1)

Study Arms (2)

A

EXPERIMENTAL

As this is a crossover trial, the study arms denote the order in which the two interventions are performed by the subject. In Arm A, subjects will perform the "Push-Pull Technique" of manual fluid resuscitation first, followed by the "Disconnect-Reconnect Technique" second. A washout period of at least 30 minutes between each of the two interventions will be observed.

Procedure: Push-Pull techniqueProcedure: Disconnect-Reconnect Technique

B

EXPERIMENTAL

As this is a crossover trial, the study arms denote the order in which the two interventions are performed by the subject. In Arm B, subjects will perform the "Disconnect-Reconnect Technique" of manual fluid resuscitation first, followed by the "Push-Pull Technique" second. A washout period of at least 30 minutes between each of the two interventions will be observed.

Procedure: Push-Pull techniqueProcedure: Disconnect-Reconnect Technique

Interventions

Participants will administer 900 mL (60 mL/kg) of NS to a model of a 15 kg toddler in shock. The intervention is the mode of administration of the fluid. For the "Push-Pull Technique", the 7 cm catheter extension tubing will be connected to one of the three ports of a triple stopcock. A second of the 3 ports of the triple stopcock will be connected to an IV tubing set connected to a 1 L bag of NS. A 60 mL syringe will be connected to the third port of the triple stopcock. On verbal prompt, participants will "pull" fluid from the bag of NS by withdrawing the plunger of the 60 mL syringe, filling it with saline. They will then toggle the switch of the triple stopcock, so that it is "off" to the bag of NS and "open" to IV catheter extension tubing leading to the model. They will then depress the syringe plunger, administering the fluid to the model. These steps will be repeated until each participant believes that they have administered the requested volume of fluid to the model.

AB

Participants will administer 900 mL (60 mL/kg) of NS to a model of a 15 kg toddler in shock. The intervention is the mode of administration of the fluid. For the "Disconnect-Reconnect Technique", the proximal end of the 7 cm catheter extension tubing will be capped with a needleless adapter. The subject will be provided with 60 mL syringes filled with NS, rapidly prepared in real time by an assistant. Syringes will be prepared by withdrawing NS from a 1 L bag via a Gambro Accessory spike. The subject will administer the requested volume of NS to the model by 1. grabbing one of the fluid-filled syringes 2. connecting the fluid-filled syringe to the needleless adapter, and 3. depressing the syringe plunger resulting in administration of the NS to the model. These steps will be repeated until the subject believes they have administered the requested volume of NS to the model. Testing will begin on verbal prompt. The subject and assistant will not be permitted to switch roles.

AB

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Health Care Providers working or training at McMaster Children's Hospital, including staff nurses, staff physicians, postgraduate medical trainees, nursing students, and medical students
  • may be asked to perform manual fluid resuscitation as part of their clinical care activities

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to understand English
  • Limited manual dexterity, specifically resulting in an inability to perform manual fluid resuscitation involving syringes
  • Have acted in a physically strenuous capacity that may result in significant hand fatigue in the 30 minutes immediately prior to performance of the intervention. Where this is the only criteria limiting subject participation, rescheduling of an alternate testing time will be permitted.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McMaster Children's Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, L8S4K1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Cole ET, Harvey G, Urbanski S, Foster G, Thabane L, Parker MJ. Rapid paediatric fluid resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques in a simulated setting. BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 3;4(7):e005028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005028.

  • Cole ET, Harvey G, Foster G, Thabane L, Parker MJ. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques. BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 21;3(3):e002754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002754.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shock

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Melissa J Parker, MD, MSc

    McMaster Children's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2013

First Posted

January 23, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

October 29, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-10

Locations