NCT01772693

Brief Summary

This is a feasibility study to evaluate the safety and initial effectiveness of unilateral ExAblate thermal ablation of the Vim thalamic nucleus of subjects suffering from medication-refractory, idiopathic, tremor-dominant PD, using the ExAblate Transcranial system compared to a Sham Vim thalamotomy procedure. Data will be collected to establish the basic safety of this type of treatment as the basis for later studies that will evaluate its full clinical efficacy. The Sham treatment data will be used to evaluate placebo effect from treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 28, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2013

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 26, 2016

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 9, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

November 28, 2012

Results QC Date

July 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Adverse Events

    Evaluate of adverse events (AEs) associated with the ExAblate Transcranial thalamotomy of medication-refractory, tremor-dominant PD during the ExAblate treatment. Primary safety analyses are reported in the adverse events module.

    Month 3

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Tremor Motor Score Percent Change From Baseline.

    Baseline, Month 3

  • Tremor Motor Scores - Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor - Treated Side Upper Extremity Parts A & B.

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

  • Functional Disabilities - Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor Part C - Functional Disabilities

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

Study Arms (2)

ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

EXPERIMENTAL

ExAblate Transcranial MR guided Focused Ultrasound

Device: ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

Sham ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham treatment with ExAblate MR guided Focused Ultrasound

Device: Sham ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

Interventions

ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound

Also known as: ExAblate, MRgFUS, Focused Ultrasound, Transcranial MRgFUS Thalamotomy
ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

Sham ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound

Sham ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men and women, age 30 years and older
  • Subjects who are able and willing to give informed consent and able to attend all study visits
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of idiopathic PD as confirmed from clinical history and examination by a movement disorder neurologist at the site
  • Subject demonstrates a severe resting tremor or postural/action as measured by UPDRS
  • Subject exhibits a significant disability from their PD tremor despite medical treatment
  • Subjects should be on a stable dose of all PD medications for 30 days prior to study entry
  • Subject is able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate Transcranial procedure

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with unstable cardiac status
  • Subjects exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse
  • Severe hypertension
  • Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  • Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent including advanced kidney disease or severely impaired renal function
  • Significant claustrophobia that cannot be managed with mild medication
  • Current medical condition resulting in abnormal bleeding and/or coagulopathy
  • Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage
  • History of intracranial hemorrhage
  • History of multiple strokes, or a stroke within past 6 months
  • Subjects who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment
  • Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  • Subjects unable to communicate with the investigator and staff
  • Subjects with a history of seizures within the past year
  • Subjects with brain tumors
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States

Location

Swedish Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bond AE, Shah BB, Huss DS, Dallapiazza RF, Warren A, Harrison MB, Sperling SA, Wang XQ, Gwinn R, Witt J, Ro S, Elias WJ. Safety and Efficacy of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Patients With Medication-Refractory, Tremor-Dominant Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1412-1418. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3098.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

This is a feasibility trial with no pre-defined hypothesis testing. It is primarily a safety trial with a secondary objective of collecting efficacy outcomes for developing future pivotal trials.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Nadir Alikacem, Ph.D., VP Clinical Research
Organization
Insightec

Study Officials

  • Jeff Elias, M.D.

    University of Virginia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Single factor. ExAblate test verses ExAblate placebo randomized 2:1.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2012

First Posted

January 21, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion

April 26, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2019

Last Updated

October 9, 2020

Results First Posted

October 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations