Comparison of Lipiflow®-Treatment and a Standard Lid Hygiene Regime
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of an Automated Thermal Pulsation Treatment (Lipiflow ®) and a Standard Lid Hygiene Regime
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently, beneficial effects on Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) of a single automated thermal pulsation with the Lipiflow® system have been reported in several case reports. In one study this treatment was compared with hyperthermia (iheat®) for 4 weeks. However, treatment recommendations for lid hygiene according to the MGD-report consist of hyperthermia followed by lid massage and lid margin cleansing over several months. To the best of the investigators knowledge this is the first randomized prospective study to compare automated thermal pulsation treatment with the new Lipiflow ® system with a standard lid hygiene regime. The investigators suggest that a single treatment with Lipiflow® is superior to a lid hygiene regime.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 7, 2014
CompletedOctober 7, 2014
October 1, 2014
1.2 years
January 11, 2013
September 1, 2014
October 6, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of Dry Eye Symptoms
The symptoms of dry eyes are measured in our study with the OSDI and the SPEED questionaire. Primary outcome measure (OSDI) Patients completed two symptom questionnaires: OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) and SPEED (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye dryness). OSDI scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (severe symptoms). SPEED scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 28 (severe symptoms). So a reduction of the OSDI or SPEED score indicates an improvement of subjective dry eye symptoms.
after 3 month compared to baseline value
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change of Break-up-time
after 3 month compared to baseline value
Change in Tear Film Osmolarity
after 3 month compared to baseline value
Change in Lipid Layer Thickness
after 3 month compared to baseline value
Change in Expressible Meibomian Glands
after 3 month compared to baseline value
Study Arms (2)
Standard Lid Hygiene Regime
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive detailed verbal and written instruction to perform lid hygiene twice daily
Lipiflow
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive a singe Lipiflow-treatment
Interventions
Patients receive verbal and written instruction to perform lid hygiene twice daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients with meibomian gland dysfunction requiring treatment (defined below),
- who have given their written consent to the study.
- Meibomian gland dysfunction requiring treatment is classified by us as:
- Speed score\> 7, Lipiview \<61 nm, MGE \<5 of 15 open glands
You may not qualify if:
- Excluded are patients who, due to other diseases would not be able to fulfill the follow-up appointments or give an informed consent to the study
- Systemic medication with tetracyclin derivatives, antihistamines, isotretinoin, or nutritional supplements for MGD that started \<3 months before baseline examination
- Topical cyclosporine-A or steroids that started \<1 month before baseline examination
- Ocular surgery or trauma \<3 months before baseline examination
- Any eyelid abnormalities
- Systemic diseases resulting in dry eye.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Deparment of ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University
Düsseldorf, D-40225, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Finis D, Hayajneh J, Konig C, Borrelli M, Schrader S, Geerling G. Evaluation of an automated thermodynamic treatment (LipiFlow(R)) system for meibomian gland dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, observer-masked trial. Ocul Surf. 2014 Apr;12(2):146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
PMID: 24725326RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
For further information please have a look at Finis et al: Evaluation of an automated thermodynamic treatment (LipiFlow®) system for meibomian gland dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, observer-masked trial.Ocul Surf. 2014 Apr;12(2):146-54.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Finis
- Organization
- Department of ophthalmology, University of Duesseldorf
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gerd Geerling, M.D.
Deparmtent of ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator, department of ophthalmology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2013
First Posted
January 16, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 7, 2014
Results First Posted
October 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10