Efficacy Study of a Novel Device to Clean the Endotracheal Tube
Endotracheal Tubes Cleaned With a Novel Mechanism for Secretions Removal
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the in-vivo efficacy of a novel device (endOclear) for cleaning the endotracheal tube (ETT) lumen from secretions. The investigators hypothesize that a protocol of routine ETT cleaning with endOclear may increase the ETT luminal volume measured at extubation compared to the current standard of care. The device may therefore be clinically useful by better maintaining the ETT original function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 29, 2017
CompletedOctober 18, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.2 years
December 28, 2012
October 26, 2016
September 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Occlusion Assessed Using a High Definition Computed Tomography Imaging of the Extubated ETTs
The investigators will measure percentage of occlusion determined by the accumulation of secretion within the lumen of each ETT using a high definition Computed Tomography (CT) imaging of the extubated ETTs. The whole ETT will be analyzed through high-definition CT slices. 100% of occlusion means total occlusion of the lumen of the ETT and 0% means absence of any occlusion.
At extubation (An expected average of 5 days)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
ETT Microbiology
At extubation (An expected average of 5 days)
Study Arms (2)
ETT cleaning manuver
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the treatment group will undergo an ETT cleaning maneuver with endOclear three times a day (every 8 hours) for the whole intubation period in addition to the standard of care.
Standard of care
NO INTERVENTIONIn the protocol no intervention is planned for the control group, which will therefore be treated with blind suctioning as per caregiver clinical decision.
Interventions
EndOclear device will be used for ETT cleaning maneuver. This is a commercially available device. It consists of an ETT cleaning apparatus with a flexible central tube and a cleaning device at its distal end. The cleaning device has a mechanically expandable mesh structure which can be adapted to selectively move between a radially-collapsed position and a radially-expanded one. In operation, the collapsed cleaning apparatus is inserted into the ETT through a Y-shaped connector. The device is then expanded by a safety toggle protected trigger mechanism that, when fired, presses the device's smooth silicone disc against the inside surface of the ETT. The cleaning apparatus is then pulled out of the ETT removing mucus deposits and secretions. We will add endOclear to the standard ICU practice, scheduling the systematic use of the device every 8 hours for the whole intubation period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patients expected to be intubated for at least 48 hours or longer
- Enrollment within 24 hours from intubation time
You may not qualify if:
- Current and past participation in another intervention trial conflicting with the present study
- Pregnant women and prisoners
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- West Virginia Universitycollaborator
- endOclear, LLC.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (13)
Adair CG, Gorman SP, Feron BM, Byers LM, Jones DS, Goldsmith CE, Moore JE, Kerr JR, Curran MD, Hogg G, Webb CH, McCarthy GJ, Milligan KR. Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Oct;25(10):1072-6. doi: 10.1007/s001340051014.
PMID: 10551961BACKGROUNDShapiro M, Wilson RK, Casar G, Bloom K, Teague RB. Work of breathing through different sized endotracheal tubes. Crit Care Med. 1986 Dec;14(12):1028-31. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198612000-00007.
PMID: 3780244BACKGROUNDHeyer L, Louis B, Isabey D, Lofaso F, Brochard L, Fredberg JJ, Harf A. Noninvasive estimate of work of breathing due to the endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1324-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00013.
PMID: 8968179BACKGROUNDGlass C, Grap MJ, Sessler CN. Endotracheal tube narrowing after closed-system suctioning: prevalence and risk factors. Am J Crit Care. 1999 Mar;8(2):93-100.
PMID: 10071699BACKGROUNDShah C, Kollef MH. Endotracheal tube intraluminal volume loss among mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):120-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104205.96219.D6.
PMID: 14707569BACKGROUNDBoque MC, Gualis B, Sandiumenge A, Rello J. Endotracheal tube intraluminal diameter narrowing after mechanical ventilation: use of acoustic reflectometry. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Dec;30(12):2204-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2465-4. Epub 2004 Oct 2.
PMID: 15580475BACKGROUNDVillafane MC, Cinnella G, Lofaso F, Isabey D, Harf A, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Gradual reduction of endotracheal tube diameter during mechanical ventilation via different humidification devices. Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1341-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00015.
PMID: 8968181BACKGROUNDBerra L, Coppadoro A, Bittner EA, Kolobow T, Laquerriere P, Pohlmann JR, Bramati S, Moss J, Pesenti A. A clinical assessment of the Mucus Shaver: a device to keep the endotracheal tube free from secretions. Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):119-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822e9fe3.
PMID: 21926595BACKGROUNDStone RH, Bricknell SS. Experience with a new device for clearing mucus from the endotracheal tube. Respir Care. 2011 Apr;56(4):520-2. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00642. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
PMID: 21255488BACKGROUNDInglis TJ, Millar MR, Jones JG, Robinson DA. Tracheal tube biofilm as a source of bacterial colonization of the lung. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Sep;27(9):2014-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.2014-2018.1989.
PMID: 2778064BACKGROUNDWilson AM, Gray DM, Thomas JG. Increases in endotracheal tube resistance are unpredictable relative to duration of intubation. Chest. 2009 Oct;136(4):1006-1013. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1938. Epub 2009 May 1.
PMID: 19411293BACKGROUNDBerra L, Curto F, Li Bassi G, Laquerriere P, Baccarelli A, Kolobow T. Antibacterial-coated tracheal tubes cleaned with the Mucus Shaver : a novel method to retain long-term bactericidal activity of coated tracheal tubes. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jun;32(6):888-93. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0125-6. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
PMID: 16601964BACKGROUNDKolobow T, Berra L, Li Bassi G, Curto F. Novel system for complete removal of secretions within the endotracheal tube: the Mucus Shaver. Anesthesiology. 2005 May;102(5):1063-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200505000-00028. No abstract available.
PMID: 15851896BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert M Kacmarek PhD, RRT
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert M Kacmarek, PhD, RRT
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Respiratory Care Services; Professor of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2012
First Posted
January 10, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 18, 2017
Results First Posted
March 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04