NCT03969147

Brief Summary

Guedel pattern or oropharyngeal airways (OPA) maintain an open oral airway in unconscious or semi-conscious patients by preventing the tongue from covering the epiglottis, but OPA placement carries a risk of inducing gag reflex and vomiting. Although various sizes are available, the design of the OPA has undergone little change since its introduction in the 1920s. The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of a novel airway device, the ManMaxAirway (MMA), as an alternative to the OPA.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 16, 2018

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 31, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

February 16, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 29, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Ability to place the Novel Airway Adjunct

    Any inability of conscious, healthy volunteers to place the device (MMA) in their mouth will be recorded.

    1 minute (During tolerability comparison experiment)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Displacement of the mandibular condyle and the condylar fossa apex (MRI arm)

    2-3 weeks following MRI scans.

  • Number of respirations with airway adjunct in place (Tolerability Arm)

    1 minute (During tolerability comparison experiment)

  • Elapsed time (up to 60 seconds) that subject is able to tolerate having the airway adjunct in place (Tolerability Arm)

    1 minute (During tolerability comparison experiment.)

  • Visual Analog Tolerability

    1 minute (following tolerability comparison experiment.)

  • Resistance to oscillatory air flow

    1 minute (Assessment done following physical lab tests)

Study Arms (3)

MRI Comparison

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

MRI images will be obtained of the airways of healthy volunteers both with the ManMaxAirway oropharyngeal airway adjunct and with no airway adjunct in place in order to observe any changes to the airway anatomy caused by placement of the airway adjunct. The order of the scans (with and without airway adjunct) will be determined by randomization software in advance.

Device: ManMaxAirway oropharyngeal airway adjunctDevice: No airway adjunct

Tolerability Comparison

EXPERIMENTAL

Healthy volunteers will self-place either the ManMaxAirway oropharyngeal airway adjunct or the Guedel Oropharyngeal airway adjunct, which will be left in place for an interval of one minute, while supervised by research staff. After completing a questionnaire and resting for a timed interval, they will then self-place the other airway adjunct, which will be left in place for the same length of time as the first, before completing another questionnaire. The order in which the devices are placed by each subject will be determined in advance via computer randomization.

Device: ManMaxAirway oropharyngeal airway adjunctDevice: Guedel Oropharyngeal airway adjunct

Forced Oscillation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Volunteers from the tolerability comparison arm will also be invited as a subset of subjects to participate in a measurement of resistance to forced oscillation. The volunteers will be subject to forced oscillations in a pulmonary function lab with the ManMaxAirway oropharyngeal airway adjunct in place and with no airway adjunct in order to observe changes in resistance to oscillatory airflow

Device: ManMaxAirway oropharyngeal airway adjunctDevice: No airway adjunct

Interventions

Healthy volunteers will self-place the ManMaxAirway.

Forced OscillationMRI ComparisonTolerability Comparison

Healthy volunteers will self-place the standard Guedel OPA.

Tolerability Comparison

Healthy volunteers will have no airway adjunct in place.

Forced OscillationMRI Comparison

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy volunteers over the age of 18.

You may not qualify if:

  • For Tolerability arm: History of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, dental implants or dental prostheses

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Vermont College of Medicine

Burlington, Vermont, 05401, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Airway Obstruction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory InsufficiencyRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Kalev Freeman, MD, PhD

    University of Vermont Department of Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Zachary Miller, BA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2018

First Posted

May 31, 2019

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 30, 2019

Study Completion

June 30, 2019

Last Updated

May 31, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations