Pressure-controlled vs Volume Controlled Ventilation on RV Function During OLV
Right Ventricular Function During One-lung Ventilation: The Effects of Pressure Controlled and Volume Controlled Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of pressure controlled ventilation (TV) during one lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery is associated with comparable oxygenation with volume controlled ventilation (VCV) with added benefits of decreasing airway pressures and shunt fraction. The later may improve the right ventricular (RV) function during OLV. We postulate that the use of PCV during OLV for thoracic surgery would preserve RV function than during VCV. After local ethics committee approval and informed consent, we will randomly allocate 28 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery OLV to randomly crossed from PCV to VCV mode (n= 14 for each) during with VT of 6 mL/kg, I: E ratio 1: 2.5, PEEP of 5 cm H2O, recruitment maneuvers and respiratory rate will be adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Intraoperative changes in the right ventricular function (peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and RV fractional area changes (RV-FAC)), hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters, peak and plateau airway pressures, compliance will be recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedJuly 25, 2013
July 1, 2013
9 months
December 30, 2012
July 24, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Right ventricular function
Peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV)
Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Blood pressure
Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Pa/FiO2 ratio
Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Airway pressures
Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Right ventricular volumes
Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Study Arms (2)
The PCV-VCV group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe dependent lung will be ventilated with pressure controlled (PCV) followed by the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV)
The VCV-PCV group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe dependent lung will be ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) followed by the pressure controlled (PCV)
Interventions
During the PCV period, the inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to deliver a TV of 6 mL/kg (predicted body weight) to the patient's dependent lung. During the VCV period, the patient's dependent lung will be ventilated with a TV of 6 mL/kg (PBW). Whereas FiO2, I: E ratio, PEEP, frequency, Ppk, and a FGF will be maintained as during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and the lumen of the nondependent lung will be left open to air. Dependent lung recruitment maneuvers will be repeated at 30-minute intervals by raising the inspiratory pressure up to 35 cmH2O for 10 seconds.
During the PCV period, the inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to deliver a TV of 6 mL/kg (predicted body weight) to the patient's dependent lung. During the VCV period, the patient's dependent lung will be ventilated with a TV of 6 mL/kg (PBW). Whereas FiO2, I: E ratio, PEEP, frequency, Ppk, and a FGF will be maintained as during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and the lumen of the nondependent lung will be left open to air. Dependent lung recruitment maneuvers will be repeated at 30-minute intervals by raising the inspiratory pressure up to 35 cmH2O for 10 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical class from II to III
You may not qualify if:
- decompensated cardiac (New York Heart Association \>II)
- pulmonary (vital capacity or FEV1% \< 50% of the predicted values)
- asthma
- hepatic diseases.
- renal diseases
- arrhythmias
- pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure \>30 mm Hg)
- body mass index \>35 kg/m2
- previous history of pneumonectomy, bilobectomy, or lobectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Anesthesiology Department
Khobar, Eastern Province, 31592, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohamed R El Tahan, MD
Assistant Professor
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roshdi Al Metwally, MD
Associate Professor
- STUDY CHAIR
Hatem Qutub, MD
Associate Professor
- STUDY CHAIR
Yasser F El Ghoneimy, MD
Associate Professor
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohamed A Regal, MD
Associate Professor
- STUDY CHAIR
Haytham Zien, MD
Assistant Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2012
First Posted
January 9, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 25, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07