Study to Explore the Effect of Lowering Blood Viscosity in Patients With Treatment-resistant Critical Limb Ischemia
CLI-PH
Phase 2 Study to Explore the Effect of Lowering Blood Viscosity in Patients With Treatment-resistant Critical Limb Ischemia
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
PAD is caused by an increased flow resistance in atherosclerotic ischemic limbs. The investigators hypothesize that reducing blood viscosity (through controlled phlebotomy), thereby increasing the deformability of red blood cells, should reduce the flow resistance and improve tissue perfusion leading to improved clinical function and a reduction in symptoms. Preliminary data demonstrates that phlebotomy causes a measurable change in blood viscosity as measured by the home-made rheologic method. To evaluate the effectiveness of changes in blood viscosity, obtained through controlled phlebotomy, as a therapy to improve functional status associated with atherosclerotic ischemic limbs in pre-amputation patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 1, 2013
CompletedJanuary 1, 2013
December 1, 2012
7 months
May 14, 2012
December 27, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Major amputation rate (limb salvage rate)
The rate of lower limb major amputation (limb salvage rate) was measured in both study arms, during 5 year follow-up period. They would be the evidences of phlebotomy treatment directly.
5 year follow-up period
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time-to-major amputation
5 year follow-up period
Mortality rate
5 year follow-up period
Blood viscosity measurements
Conducting study periods (4 weeks)
Other Outcomes (3)
VA pain scale
Conducting study periods (4 weeks)
Ankle-Brachial Index
Conducting study periods (4 weeks)
Complete wound healing
Conducting study periods (4 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Non phlebotomy group (control group)
NO INTERVENTION• This control group is the patients who had Rutherford classification Grade 3, Category 5 or 6 (Fontaine stage IV) treatment-resistant chronic critical limb ischemia having tissue loss. They were treated with conventional standard treatment including revascularization operative procedure if feasible, maximum medical treatment with anticoagulation (heparin, low molecular weight heparin, etc), acetylsalicylic acid, cilostazol, and prostaglandin E1, dextran, and pain analgesia with opioid, and finally major amputation. We records all control arms' amputation, day to amputation, mortality, etc. We will compare amputation and mortality between control and treatment groups. Non phlebotomy arm has no phlebotomy treatment.
PH (study group)
EXPERIMENTALThe patients will be pre-amputation and have Rutherford classification Grade 3, Category 5 or 6 (Fontaine stage IV) treatment-resistant chronic critical limb ischemia having tissue loss. Procedures for therapeutic phlebotomy 1. Inject heparin 5000 units to prevent blood clot during phlebotomy 2. Inject volume expander equivalent to 5% of blood volume 3. Remove 5% of whole blood 4. Monitor the vital sign of the patient during the phlebotomy They were treated both phlebotomy and conventional standard management including surgery, medication, amputation, etc. We will compare amputation and mortality between control and study groups.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects should have diagnosed Rutherford classification Grade 3, Category 5 or 6 (Fontaine stage IV) treatment-resistant chronic critical limb ischemia having tissue loss, not relieved by maximal medical therapy and they should have exhausted or not be candidates for surgical (other than heart transplant) or percutaneous intervention
- Male
- Age: 18 to 80 years
- Current non-smokers
- BMI \>19
- Estimated 6 month survival rate \>90%
- Concomitant stable medications will be allowed.
- If the subjects have coronary artery disease established by history, angina pain, EKG, Lab including Troponin I, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, Echocardiography, Thallium scan or coronary angiography, the subjects should have established a classification of coronary artery involvement by coronary angiography or other procedure with similar precision.
You may not qualify if:
- Anemia
- Low blood pressure (systolic \< 120 mmHg)
- Baseline hematocrit \< 30
- Initial whole blood viscosity measurements below 15 miliPoiseille
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul Veterans Hospital
Seoul, 134-060, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Doosang Kim, M.D.,Ph.D.
Seoul Veterans Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Surgeon, M.D.,Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2012
First Posted
January 1, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2007
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-12