One Year Outcome Using the Ajust System for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence
1 other identifier
interventional
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During the last decade numerous new procedures have been presented regarding surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence (1,2). Development of the midurethral tape procedure (TVT) changed the surgical procedure dramatically both regarding the extent of the surgical procedure and also decreased the morbidity remarkably. The success rate of the TVT procedure has been proven to be high (1,2 ). However, the development of the TOT/TVT-O procedures disclosed a new fixation point and further decreased the risk of bladder injury (1,2). Since the introduction of trans-obturator slings several mini-slings have been introduced in order to reduce the need of perforation of the skin and muscles (3,4,5). Although some systems seem promising (5) others have disclosed a long learning curve, pain problems following the procedure and lower success rates, compared to the traditional sling procedures. None of these mini-slings have been adjustable. Recently the Ajust system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence was introduced. The system is a single incision sling procedure and consists of an adjustable Polypropylene mesh sling with self fixation anchors (6). In a feasibility study (6), the 6 months objective cure rate was 82%, but there is a lack of information regarding adverse events and durability of treatment success. Our preliminary experiences suggest, that the procedure has a rapid learning curve, low pain scores postoperatively and a 94% cure rate at 3 months follow-up (personal observation). Recently, several abstracts have indicated that the cure rate obtained by Ajust is comparable to TVT or TVT-O (10-12). The purpose of the present study is (primary outcome): To test the hypothesis that the Ajust and TVT, TVT-O and TOT, respectively are equal regarding subjective cure rate (cure is defined as subjectively not incontinent at all), i.e. the study is designed as a non-inferiority study. The study is performed as a randomised controlled trial without blinding. The study is powered to detect a 9% difference between the two groups. The subjective cure rate is based on ICIQ measurement Secondary outcome:
- To test the hypothesis that Ajust is associated with a significantly lower postoperative pain perception.
- To test the hypothesis that antibiotic treatment is not necessary
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedMay 2, 2014
May 1, 2014
1.9 years
December 28, 2011
May 1, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A change in number of cured patients
Primary endpoint: A change in number of cured patients. The number of patients cured is anticipated to be equal in each group. A cured patients is defined as having no subjective symptoms (i.e. no scores on the ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-OAB) and no objective detectable urinary leakage during coughing (300cc in the bladder and no leakage during coughing.
Up to 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain-perception following surgery
Evaluated the first week following surgery, and at three and 12 months follow-up
Other Outcomes (1)
number of urinary tract infections and infections related to the vaginal closure during the first postoperative months.
Evaluated during the first week of follow-up and at 3 months follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Ajust sling
EXPERIMENTALThe sling a a new device for stress urinary incontinence. The sling is ajustable and is not penetrating the skin, i.e. is only attached to the obturator membrane
TVT/TVT-O, polypropylne slings
EXPERIMENTALTVT/TVT-O system. These two systems is wellknown and used for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The sling penetrate the skin in order to secure adjustment.
Interventions
The use of Ajust system for stress incontinence
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- 1. A medical history of stress urinary incontinence, i.e. leakage during coughing, sneezing or leakage during physical exertion. OR 2. A medical history of mixed urinary stress incontinence defined as complaint of involuntary leakage associated with urgency and stress incontinence. Stress incontinence has to the dominating symptom defined as more episodes of leakage due to coughing or physical exertion than with urgency.
- \. A provocative stress test up to ten coughs at a standardized bladder volume (300 ml) confirming urinary leakage from the urethra while the patient is asked to cough or perform a Valsalva manoeuvre standing or lying (7). Furthermore, the patient has to present hypermobility of the urethra/bladder neck defined as significant downward rotation when coughing or during Valsalva.?
You may not qualify if:
- Previous anti-incontinence surgery.
- Residual urine volume \>100 ml
- Bladder capacity \<200ml according to diary.
- Planned or current pregnancy
- Repeated urinary tract infections (\>4 cystitis last year )
- Current anticoagulation therapy that can´t be interrupted in due time prior to surgery
- Known abnormal coagulation
- Allergy to local anaesthetics
- Co-existing pelvic pathology, such as ovarian mass etc
- Vaginal POPQ anterior prolapse grade \>=2
- A medical history of predominantly urge urinary incontinence.
- Patients unable to understand the protocol and a follow up
- Patients younger than 18 and above or equal to 60 years.
- Known or suspected neurological condition
- Patients who have not paused acethylsalicylic acid (ASA) medication 7 days prior to surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Martin Rudnicki
Roskilde, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Temtanakitpaisan T, Buppasiri P, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Rattanakanokchai S. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infection after continence surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD012457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012457.pub2.
PMID: 35349162DERIVEDRudnicki M, von Bothmer-Ostling K, Holstad A, Magnusson C, Majida M, Merkel C, Prien J, Jakobsson U, Teleman P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13205. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
PMID: 28815547DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ass. Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2011
First Posted
December 21, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05