Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning Trial
MUST
1 other identifier
interventional
318
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of intra-operative tensioning of retropubic midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence. Primary outcome is rate of abnormal bladder function. Secondary outcomes include validated quality of life scores, physical exam findings, and rates of immediate post operative voiding dysfunction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedApril 1, 2020
March 1, 2020
3.6 years
June 17, 2015
March 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Abnormal Bladder Function
Abnormal post-operative bladder function a composite outcome assessed at 12 months after surgery. It is one or more of the following: 1) significantly bothersome stress incontinence or over active bladder symptoms after surgery as measured by questions 1, 2, 3 of the Urogential Distress Inventory (UDI-6) 2) a positive cough stress test in the office, 3) re-treatment for stress urinary incontinence (repeat surgery or pessary use), 4) post-operative urinary retention (presence of self-catheterization at 6 weeks post-operatively or beyond, or therapeutic intervention for retention at any time during the 12 months after, such as pelvic floor physiotherapy, sling lysis, urethrolysis, or sacral nerve stimulation.
1 year post operative
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rate of discharge from hospital with on-going need for catheterization
12 months
Duration of catheterization after surgery
12 months
Questionnaire scores
12 months
Pad test
12 month
Uroflow parameters
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Babcock tensioning technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup for whom the retropubic mid-urethral sling was tensioned using a Babcock clamp.
Scissor spacer technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup for whom the retropubic mid-urethral sling was tensioned using a surgical scissor as a spacer.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Women who have elected for surgical management of symptomatic urinary incontinence
- Ability to read \& write in English
- Other prolapse surgery at time of sling placement is allowed
- Must consent to participation in trial
You may not qualify if:
- Women with a prior incontinence procedure
- Clinically obvious, but non-symptomatic stress urinary incontinence (latent stress incontinence)
- Declines participation in trial
- Women with existing urinary retention or significant overactive bladder (requiring medication)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Calgarylead
- Boston Scientific Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Foothills Hospital, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4J8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Brennand EA, Wu G, Houlihan S, Globerman D, Gagnon LH, Birch C, Hyakutake M, Carlson KV, Al-Shankiti H, Robert M, Lazare D, Kim-Fine S; Calgary Women's Pelvic Health Research Group. Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):471-481. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004027.
PMID: 32769657DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erin A Brennand, MD
University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2015
First Posted
June 24, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share