Vinorelbine and Ifosfamide as Third-line Treatment for Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase Ⅱ Single-arm Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Vinorelbine-ifosfamide Regimen as Third-line Treatment in Refractory or Recurrent Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although fist-line therapy with Cisplatin and etoposide(EP)or Carboplatin and etoposide(CE)and second-line therapy with topotecan has been given, patients with ED-SCLC still relapse and 2-year survival is less than 10%. There is no standard treatment recommendation for this group of patients who failed to second-line therapy and had good performance status. Some cytotoxic drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, i.e. vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and ifosfamide, were used in refractory or recurrent SCLC patients. Recently, a retrospective study showed the overall response rate was 30%, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months, and the median overall survival was 10.4 months in advanced combined SCLC patients treated with first-line regimen of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (NIP). Because of the previous platinum administration and patient's performance status, only vinorelbine and ifosfamide (NI) are combined and used as third-line therapy for refractor or recurrent ED-SCLC in our lung cancer center. And this clinical trial is designed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of NI regimen in refractory or recurrent ED-SCLC patients in our center.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2012
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 19, 2012
December 1, 2012
2 years
December 12, 2012
December 14, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the disease control rate
The disease control rate includes the rate of progression disease,partial remission and stable disease.
up to 9 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
progression free survival
up to 52 weeks (about one year)
Overall survival
Up to 100 weeks
the score of functional assessment of cancer treatment-lung (FACT-L)
up to 52 weeks
Number of participants with adverse events
Up to six months
Study Arms (1)
refractory SCLC
NI group vinorelbine 25mg/m2 d1,d8; Ifosfamide 1.25g/m2 d1-d3; Mesna 400mg iv 0,4,8 hours after ifosfamide administration for 3 days; every 3 weeks; up to the maximum cycles (total:6);
Interventions
vinorelbine 25mg/m2 d1,d8; ifosfamide 1.25g/m2 d1-d3; Mesna 400mg iv 0,4,8 hours after ifosfamide administration for 3 days
Eligibility Criteria
ED-SCLC patients who relapse after treatment with first-line EP or CE and second-line topotecan.
You may qualify if:
- histologically or cytologically confirmed ED-SCLC;
- age\>18 and \<75;
- measurable disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST);
- previous treatments including first-line therapy with EP or CE and second-line therapy with topotecan;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-2;
- life expectancy \> 3 months;
- neutrophil count \> 1500/ul;
- platelet count \> 100,000ul;
- hemoglobin level \> 9g/dl;
- bilirubin level \< 1.5mg/dL;
- creatinine level \< 2mg/dl;
- alanine transaminase (AST) levels \< 2.5× upper limit of normal (ULN)(or \< 5× ULN if liver metastases were present);
You may not qualify if:
- previous anticancer therapy including vinorelbine or ifosfamide;
- newly diagnosed central nervous system (CNS) metastasis and not treated by radiotherapy or surgery;
- additional malignancies;
- uncontrolled systemic disease;
- pregnancy or breast feeding phase;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Related Publications (9)
Jackman DM, Johnson BE. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2005 Oct 15-21;366(9494):1385-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67569-1.
PMID: 16226617RESULTSimon GR, Turrisi A; American College of Chest Physicians. Management of small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):324S-339S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1385.
PMID: 17873178RESULTClark R, Ihde DC. Small-cell lung cancer: treatment progress and prospects. Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 May;12(5):647-58; discussion 661-3.
PMID: 9597676RESULTFukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y, Ikegami H, Tamura T, Shimoyama M, Suemasu K. Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Jun 19;83(12):855-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/83.12.855.
PMID: 1648142RESULTWolf M, Havemann K, Holle R, Gropp C, Drings P, Hans K, Schroeder M, Heim M, Dommes M, Mende S, et al. Cisplatin/etoposide versus ifosfamide/etoposide combination chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter German randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1987 Dec;5(12):1880-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.12.1880.
PMID: 2824710RESULTRoth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Schacter LP, Cherng NC, Cohen HJ, Crawford J, Randolph JA, Goodlow JL, Broun GO, et al. Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Feb;10(2):282-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.282.
PMID: 1310103RESULTSkarlos DV, Samantas E, Kosmidis P, Fountzilas G, Angelidou M, Palamidas P, Mylonakis N, Provata A, Papadakis E, Klouvas G, et al. Randomized comparison of etoposide-cisplatin vs. etoposide-carboplatin and irradiation in small-cell lung cancer. A Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group study. Ann Oncol. 1994 Sep;5(7):601-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058931.
PMID: 7993835RESULTvon Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA, Fields SZ, Kleisbauer JP, Chrysson NG, Stewart DJ, Clark PI, Palmer MC, Depierre A, Carmichael J, Krebs JB, Ross G, Lane SR, Gralla R. Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Feb;17(2):658-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.658.
PMID: 10080612RESULTLuo J, Wu FY, Li AW, Zheng D, Liu JM. Comparison of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (NIP) and etoposide and cisplatin (EP) for treatment of advanced combined small cell lung cancer (cSCLC) patients: a retrospective study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4703-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4703.
PMID: 23167406RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mengzhao Wang, MD
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2012
First Posted
December 19, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 19, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12