NCT01749800

Brief Summary

The overall goal of the proposed project is to perform a preliminary study to assess the potential effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on the outcomes of a cognitive test of attention and the outcomes of robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2011

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 12, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 17, 2012

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2014

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 31, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

December 12, 2012

Results QC Date

March 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

TBIAttention deficitsUpper extremity weakness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sustained Attention to Response Task

    Subjects are presented with objects (one at the time) on a computer screen and are instructed to press a key on the keyboard according to the characteristics of the object shown on the computer screen. Error rates are measured as percentage of erroneous key selections.

    Baseline and end-of-treatment data (up to 2 weeks)

Study Arms (3)

Cognitive test with/without GVS

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects with attention span deficits and no significant motor impairments undergo solely a cognitive test. The test is carried out in multiple trials. For some of the trials (randomly selected), subjects receive galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). For other trials, subjects received sham GVS. GVS is delivered using a device by A-M Systems.

Device: GVSDevice: Sham GVS

Armeo Spring +GVS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments undergo robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in combination with galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). Robot-assisted training is carried out using the Armeo Spring system by Hocoma AG. GVS is delivered using a device by A-M Systems.

Device: GVSDevice: Armeo Spring

Armeo Spring + sham GVS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments undergo robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in combination with sham GVS. Robot-assisted training is carried out using the Armeo Spring system by Hocoma AG. Sham stimulation is delivered by connecting the subject to a device by A-M Systems, but the device is not active.

Device: Sham GVSDevice: Armeo Spring

Interventions

GVSDEVICE

A small current is delivered to the vestibular system via electrodes placed over the subject's mastoid processes.

Also known as: Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator, Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA
Armeo Spring +GVSCognitive test with/without GVS
Sham GVSDEVICE

Electrodes are placed over the subject's mastoid processes and connected to the device, but the device is not active.

Also known as: Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator, Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA
Armeo Spring + sham GVSCognitive test with/without GVS

A robotic system supports the weak arm of the subject to make it easier to perform therapeutic exercises.

Also known as: Device: Armeo Spring, Produced by: Hocoma
Armeo Spring + sham GVSArmeo Spring +GVS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury involving cognitive and/or motor deficits.
  • Neurological injury \>1 year prior to study enrollment
  • Significant attention deficit
  • For subjects with motor deficits (arms 2 and 3), sufficient voluntary movement and range of motion in the most-affected upper extremity to use the robotic arm system (Armeo Spring)

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of seizures within 6 months of study enrollment
  • Major depression
  • Cognitive impairment that may interfere with understanding instructions
  • Severe limitations of upper extremity range of motion
  • Agitation
  • Other major neurological or psychiatric diseases
  • Participation in other forms of therapy/ intervention for upper extremity motor recovery
  • End-stage liver, kidney, cardiac or pulmonary disease
  • A terminal medical diagnosis with survival \<1 year
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse in the last 3 years
  • Adjustment of, or plan to adjust, psychoactive medications within the preceding 1 month, or within the study period.
  • Current participation in another interventional trial targeting TBI
  • Previous GVS treatment
  • Contraindications to GVS such as implants

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02129, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityParesis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Paolo Bonato
Organization
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Study Officials

  • Paolo Bonato, PhD

    Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Motion Analysis Lab

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2012

First Posted

December 17, 2012

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion

November 1, 2014

Study Completion

November 1, 2014

Last Updated

May 31, 2017

Results First Posted

May 31, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations