Effect of Mouth Rinses in Oral Malodor
MR2012
Masking and Therapeutic Effect of Different Mouth Rinses in Patients With Oral Malodor.
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bad breath or halitosis is caused by specific gases originating from the mouth or the expired air. In most cases the pathology lies within the mouth and in this case receives the name pathologic halitosis of oral cause or oral malodor. The aim of this study is to evaluate the immediate (masking) and long term (therapeutic) effect of commercially available mouth rinses in the treatment of oral malodor. For this volunteers with oral malodor detected by organoleptic evaluation and confirmed by the increase level of sulphur compounds in their breath (VSC) will be asked to use a designated mouthwash. The breath parameters will be assessed at baseline and 15' after the first rinse (15 ml, during 1 minute) and over night at the end of a period of 3 weeks during which the volunteers rinsed twice a day (15 ml, 1 minute) with the assigned mouthwash. The short and long term effect of a stannous fluoride/amine fluoride/zinc rinse; a chlorhexidine/cetylpyridinium chloride/zinc product and a negative control(fluoride rinse and/or water) will be compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 11, 2012
December 1, 2012
2 years
December 5, 2012
December 10, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline organoleptic score of breath (OLS)
A trained and calibrated "judge" sniffs the expired air of the volunteer and assesses whether it is unpleasant by using an intensity rating, normally from 0 to 5, with 0 = no odor present, 1 = barely noticeable odor, 2 = slight but clearly noticeable odor, 3 = moderate odor, 4 = strong offensive odor, and 5 = extremely foul odor (proposed by Rosenberg and McCulloch.
after15' and after 3 weeks
Change from baseline in H2S and CH3SH level in breath
A portable gas chromatograph (OralChroma™, Abilit Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan) will be used to measures the concentration of hydrogen sulphur (H2S) and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) in mouth air. The device has been calibrated and validated for its use by the manufacturer.
after 15' and after 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline global level of volatile sulphur compounds (VSC)
after 15' and after 3 weeks
Change from baseline microbial load of saliva
after 3 weeks
Change from baseline microbial load of tongue coating
after 3 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Patients' opinion
after 3 weeks
Study Arms (4)
Fluoride rinse
PLACEBO COMPARATORA fluoride rinse with alcohol was chosen because its similarity in color and aroma to the active rinses. This anti-cavity rinse does not contain any active components and therefore it is not expected to have any anti-malodour activity.
Halita
ACTIVE COMPARATORHalita is a CHX-containing benchmark product that has proven to be clinically effective against halitosis (Roldan et al, 2003)
Meridol Halitosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis study aims to confirm the effect of meridol®Halitosis(AmF/SnF2 and zinc) already observed in volunteers with morning bad breath (physiological)(Wigger-Alberti et al, 2010; Wilhelm et al, 2010)in patients with oral malodor (pathological).
Water
SHAM COMPARATORTo distinguish the masking effect caused by the formulations and the one caused by the rinsing itself.Only for short term evaluation (15') to not to compromise compliance of patients.
Interventions
rinsing with 15 ml for 1 minute
rinsing with 15 ml for 1 minute
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Caucasian
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Organoleptic score of breath ≥ 2
- VSC readings (sum of H2S and CH3SH by OralChroma) ≥ 120 ppb\*
- Intra-oral cause of bad breath
- Non-smokers
- Willing to participate and able to give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Ongoing dental treatment or any other medical treatment of the oral cavity
- Any known allergy to previously used oral hygiene products or any known allergy to any of the ingredients of the study products, which are used during the study
- Any pathological change of the oral mucosa
- Use of prohibited treatments / therapies and/or abuse of drugs, alcohol, etc
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Active caries
- Acute sinusitis
- Severe oro-pharyngeal infections
- On medications which can cause malodour
- Reduced salivary flow due to pathological reasons (e.g. Sjögren syndrome)
- Situation considered not compatible with the study according to the investigator's opinion; the latter includes: patients eating very spicy food, persons under homeopathic therapy, patients who used antibiotics during the 2 months before the study, patients frequently using chewing gum, patients under corticosteroids or other serious medications.
- Patients unwilling to abstain from additional oral hygiene (only toothbrushing allowed) particularly mouthrinse, chewing gums, breath strips, etc
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvenlead
- Gaba International AGcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Periodontology, KULeuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Quirynen M, Dadamio J, Van den Velde S, De Smit M, Dekeyser C, Van Tornout M, Vandekerckhove B. Characteristics of 2000 patients who visited a halitosis clinic. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Nov;36(11):970-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01478.x. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
PMID: 19811581BACKGROUNDWilhelm D, Gysen K, Himmelmann A, Krause C, Wilhelm KP. Short-term effect of a new mouthrinse formulation on oral malodour after single use in vivo: a comparative, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group clinical study. J Breath Res. 2010 Sep;4(3):036002. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/4/3/036002. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
PMID: 21383479BACKGROUNDWigger-Alberti W, Gysen K, Axmann EM, Wilhelm KP. Efficacy of a new mouthrinse formulation on the reduction of oral malodour in vivo. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3 week clinical study. J Breath Res. 2010 Mar;4(1):017102. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/4/1/017102. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
PMID: 21386207BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Quirynen, PhD, DDS
Universitarie Ziekenhuis Leuven
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD DDS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2012
First Posted
December 11, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 11, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12