Longitudinal Follow-up After C1 Implant Stabilization Values
A Short-term Longitudinal Follow-up After C1 Implant Stability Values.
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to describe the changes found in C1 dental implants through their early healing period. Patients requiring a standard installation of one or two implants in the maxilla, without any need for bone augmentation, will be frequently followed for 90 days. In every meeting the implants' ISQ values (values denoting the implant stability as being measured by a dedicated, commercially available, appliance called 'Osstell'). The implants' measured ISQ values will be used to describe the changes that may be found in the implants' stability through their healing period. At the end of the study the patients will be referred to their treating doctor for the completion of implants' restoration (i.e. crown).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 5, 2022
September 1, 2016
5.2 years
December 3, 2012
August 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in implant ISQ value.
The change in implants' stability values that were measured by an 'Osstell' appliance at the end of the study as compared to their baseline value.
90 days (at end of the follow-up).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Implant Marginal Bone Loss (MBL).
90 days (At the end of the follow-up).
Other Outcomes (1)
Implant survival rate.
90 days (At the end of the follow-up).
Study Arms (1)
C1 Implant
EXPERIMENTALPatient having C1 implant installed.
Interventions
Patients treated with dental implants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women over the age of 18.
- The patient will be willing, and will be available to attend all the follow-up meetings.
- The patient will accept and sign an informed consent form before the beginning of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women or women who are breast feeding.
- Patient suffering of untreated periodontal disease.
- Patient who smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day.
- Alcohol abuse.
- Patient suffering of either uncontrolled Diabetes, Osteoporosis, rheumatic arthritis, neoplastic or pre-cancerous condition, or any other condition limiting standard implant installation procedure.
- Patient who need some bone augmentation prior.
- Immediate implant placement or restorations.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hadassah Medical Organization
Jerusalem, Israel
Related Publications (5)
Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):520-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01059.x.
PMID: 15355393BACKGROUNDGlauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH. Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):428-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x.
PMID: 15248877BACKGROUNDTurkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, Tumer C, Yenigul M, Avci M. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):501-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01261.x.
PMID: 16958688BACKGROUNDHobkirk JA, Wiskott HW; Working Group 1. Biomechanical aspects of oral implants. Consensus report of Working Group 1. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:52-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01358.x.
PMID: 16968381BACKGROUNDAparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:2-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x.
PMID: 16968377BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hadas Lemberg, PhD
IRB coorinator
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- open label
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2012
First Posted
December 10, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2016-09