Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Clindamycin in Pediatric Subjects With BMI ≥ 85th Percentile
CLIN01
2 other identifiers
interventional
22
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to better understand how clindamycin works in children who fall in the 85th percentile or higher for body mass index (BMI - a ratio of weight to height). The results of the study will help better understand if children in higher BMI ranges process the medication differently and whether dosing should be adjusted in these children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jun 2013
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 19, 2016
CompletedNovember 29, 2016
October 1, 2016
1.2 years
December 5, 2012
February 10, 2016
November 21, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Clearance (Cl) in Participants Who Received Multiple Doses of Intravenous (IV) Clindamycin.
In order to understand the impact of obesity on clindamycin PK, PK data were combined to build a PK model from 3 studies that included both obese and non-obese children: 1) PTN\_Clinda Obese study (clinicaltrials.gov/ct.gov identifier NCT01744730) n = 21; 2) PTN\_POPS study (ct.gov identifier NCT01431326) n = 178; and 3) Staph Trio study (ct.gov identifier NCT01728363) n = 21. The data from the Staph-Trio study were only included for PK modeling and not intended to be compared in the analysis. PK sampling schedule for PTN\_Clinda Obese was: Pre-dose 0 (within 15 minutes prior to IV clindamycin dose), 0.5 (± 5 minutes) after dose was administered, 1-1.5 hours (hrs) after dose, 3-4 hrs after, 5-6 hrs after, and pre-next dose. Samples were collected on multiple days and averaged to arrive at a single value. Comparison of empirical Bayesian Estimates (EBE) for clearance by age cohort are presented below. Sampling schedule details for PTN\_POPS and Staph Trio were comparable.
After first study dose of IV Clindamycin through Day 14 (minimum of 3 samples; maximum of 6).
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Clearance (Cl) in Participants Who Received Multiple Doses of Intravenous (IV) Clindamycin.
In order to understand the impact of obesity on clindamycin PK, PK data were combined to build a PK model from 3 studies that included both obese and non-obese children: 1) PTN\_Clinda Obese study (clinicaltrials.gov/ct.gov identifier NCT01744730) n = 21; 2) PTN\_POPS study (ct.gov identifier NCT01431326) n = 178; and 3) Staph Trio study (ct.gov identifier NCT01728363) n = 21. The data from the Staph-Trio study were only included for PK modeling and not intended to be compared in the analysis. PK sampling schedule for PTN\_Clinda Obese was: Pre-dose 0 (within 15 minutes prior to IV clindamycin dose), 0.5 (± 5 minutes) after dose was administered, 1-1.5 hours (hrs) after dose, 3-4 hrs after, 5-6 hrs after, and pre-next dose. Samples were collected on multiple days and averaged to arrive at a single value. Comparison of EBE for clearance by age cohort normalized to 1 kg of body weight are presented below. Sampling schedule details for PTN\_POPS and Staph Trio were comparable.
After first study dose of IV Clindamycin through Day 14 (minimum of 3 samples; maximum of 6 samples).
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Clearance (Cl) in Participants Who Received Multiple Doses of Intravenous (IV) Clindamycin.
In order to understand the impact of obesity on clindamycin PK, PK data were combined to build a PK model from 3 studies that included both obese and non-obese children: 1) PTN\_Clinda Obese study (clinicaltrials.gov/ct.gov identifier NCT01744730) n = 21; 2) PTN\_POPS study (ct.gov identifier NCT01431326) n = 178; and 3) Staph Trio study (ct.gov identifier NCT01728363) n = 21. The data from the Staph-Trio study were only included for PK modeling and not intended to be compared in the analysis. PK sampling schedule for PTN\_Clinda Obese was: Pre-dose 0 (within 15 minutes prior to IV clindamycin dose), 0.5 (± 5 minutes) after dose was administered, 1-1.5 hours (hrs) after dose, 3-4 hrs after, 5-6 hrs after, and pre-next dose. Samples were collected on multiple days and averaged to arrive at a single value. Comparison of EBE for clearance by age cohort normalized to 70 kg of body weight are presented below. Sampling schedule details for PTN\_POPS and Staph Trio were comparable.
After first study dose of IV Clindamycin through Day 14 (minimum of 3 samples; maximum of 6 samples).
PK - Volume of Distribution (V) in Participants Who Received Multiple Doses of Intravenous (IV) Clindamycin.
In order to understand the impact of obesity on clindamycin PK, PK data were combined to build a PK model from 3 studies that included both obese and non-obese children: 1) PTN\_Clinda Obese study (clinicaltrials.gov/ct.gov identifier NCT01744730) n = 21; 2) PTN\_POPS study (ct.gov identifier NCT01431326) n = 178; and 3) Staph Trio study (ct.gov identifier NCT01728363) n = 21. The data from the Staph-Trio study were only included for PK modeling and not intended to be compared in the analysis. PK sampling schedule for PTN\_Clinda Obese was: Pre-dose 0 (within 15 minutes prior to IV clindamycin dose), 0.5 (± 5 minutes) after dose was administered, 1-1.5 hours (hrs) after dose, 3-4 hrs after, 5-6 hrs after, and pre-next dose. Samples were collected on multiple days and averaged to arrive at a single value. Comparison of EBE for volume of distribution by age cohort are presented below. Sampling schedule details for PTN\_POPS and Staph Trio were comparable.
After first study dose of IV Clindamycin through Day 14 (minimum of 3 samples; maximum of 6 samples).
PK - Volume of Distribution (V) in Participants Who Received Multiple Doses of Intravenous (IV) Clindamycin.
In order to understand the impact of obesity on clindamycin PK, PK data were combined to build a PK model from 3 studies that included both obese \& non-obese children: 1) PTN\_Clinda Obese study (clinicaltrials.gov/ct.gov identifier NCT01744730) n = 21; 2) PTN\_POPS study (ct.gov identifier NCT01431326) n = 178; and 3) Staph Trio study (ct.gov identifier NCT01728363) n = 21. The data from the Staph-Trio study were only included for PK modeling and not intended to be compared in the analysis. PK sampling schedule for PTN\_Clinda Obese was: Pre-dose 0 (within 15 minutes prior to IV clindamycin dose), 0.5 (± 5 minutes) after dose was administered, 1-1.5 hours (hrs) after dose, 3-4 hrs after, 5-6 hrs after, and pre-next dose. Samples were collected on multiple days and averaged to arrive at a single value. Comparison of EBE for volume of distribution by age cohort normalized to 1kg of body weight are presented below. Sampling schedule details for PTN\_POPS \& Staph Trio were comparable.
After first study dose of IV Clindamycin through Day 14 (minimum of 3 samples; maximum of 6 samples).
Study Arms (4)
Clindamycin IV-ages 2 to 11 Years Old (BMI 85-95th Percentile)
ACTIVE COMPARATORClindamycin IV: Children ages 2 to 11 years old with BMI 85th to 95th percentile. Their schedule of IV Clindamycin administration included 30-40 mg/kg/day dosed every 6 or every 8 hours with a maximum daily dose of 2.7 grams/day. Dosing greater than 2.7g/day was allowed for children receiving clindamycin as part of clinical care.
Clindamycin IV-ages 2 to 11 Years Old (BMI Greater Than 95th)
ACTIVE COMPARATORClindamycin IV: Children ages 2 to 11 years old with BMI greater than 95th percentile. Their schedule of IV Clindamycin administration included 30-40 mg/kg/day dosed every 6 or every 8 hours with a maximum daily dose of 2.7 grams/day. Dosing greater than 2.7g/day was allowed for children receiving clindamycin as part of clinical care.
Clinidamycin IV-ages 12 to 17 (BMI 85-95th Percentile)
ACTIVE COMPARATORClindamycin IV: Children ages 12 to 17 years old with BMI 85th to 95th percentile. Their schedule of IV Clindamycin administration included 30-40 mg/kg/day dosed every 6 or every 8 hours with a maximum daily dose of 2.7 grams/day. Dosing greater than 2.7g/day was allowed for children receiving clindamycin as part of clinical care.
Clindamycin IV-ages 12 to 17 (BMI Greater Than 95th)
ACTIVE COMPARATORClindamycin IV: Children ages 12 to 17 years old with BMI greater than 95th percentile. Their schedule of IV Clindamycin administration included 30-40 mg/kg/day dosed every 6 or every 8 hours with a maximum daily dose of 2.7 grams/day. Dosing greater than 2.7g/day was allowed for children receiving clindamycin as part of clinical care.
Interventions
Schedule includes 30-40 mg/kg/day dosed every 6 or every 8 hours with a maximum daily dose of 2.7 grams/day. Dosing greater than 2.7g/day will be allowed for children receiving clindamycin as part of clinical care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years - \< 18 years of age at the time of first dose of study drug
- Suspected or confirmed infection OR receiving IV clindamycin per routine care
- Negative serum pregnancy test (if female and has reached menarche) within 24 hours of first dose of study drug and agreement to practice appropriate contraceptive measures, including abstinence, from the time of the initial pregnancy test through the last dose of study drug
- BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and sex, based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations
- Signed informed consent/Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) documents by the parent/legal guardian and assent (if applicable)
You may not qualify if:
- The following apply only to those who are NOT already receiving clindamycin per routine care:
- History of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to clindamycin or lincomycin
- History of C. difficile colitis with previous administration of clindamycin
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 120 units/L
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 210 units/L
- Total bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL
- Serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL
- Receiving a neuromuscular blocker as part of their therapy
- Previous participation in the study
- Subject is on prohibited medication or herbal product (see Appendix II)
- Subject is receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS)
- Subject is post-cardiac bypass (within 24 hours)
- Subject on inotropes/pressors
- Any other condition or chronic illness that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, makes participation unadvised or unsafe
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Kansas, 64108, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Akron Children's Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 48109, United States
Related Publications (27)
Gerber JS, Coffin SE, Smathers SA, Zaoutis TE. Trends in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in children's hospitals in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):65-71. doi: 10.1086/599348.
PMID: 19463065BACKGROUNDHerigon JC, Hersh AL, Gerber JS, Zaoutis TE, Newland JG. Antibiotic management of Staphylococcus aureus infections in US children's hospitals, 1999-2008. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):e1294-300. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2867. Epub 2010 May 17.
PMID: 20478934BACKGROUNDOgden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.40. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PMID: 22253364BACKGROUNDKasten MJ. Clindamycin, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Aug;74(8):825-33. doi: 10.4065/74.8.825.
PMID: 10473362BACKGROUNDPai MP, Bearden DT. Antimicrobial dosing considerations in obese adult patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Aug;27(8):1081-91. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.8.1081.
PMID: 17655508BACKGROUNDBearden DT, Rodvold KA. Dosage adjustments for antibacterials in obese patients: applying clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 May;38(5):415-26. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200038050-00003.
PMID: 10843460BACKGROUNDFalagas ME, Kompoti M. Obesity and infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;6(7):438-46. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70523-0.
PMID: 16790384BACKGROUNDReed MD. Reversing the myths obstructing the determination of optimal age- and disease-based drug dosing in pediatrics. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jan;16(1):4-13.
PMID: 22477819BACKGROUNDJacobs MR. How can we predict bacterial eradication? Int J Infect Dis. 2003 Mar;7 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1016/s1201-9712(03)90066-x.
PMID: 12839703BACKGROUNDBradley JS, Garonzik SM, Forrest A, Bhavnani SM. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and Monte Carlo simulation: selecting the best antimicrobial dose to treat an infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Nov;29(11):1043-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181f42a53. No abstract available.
PMID: 20975453BACKGROUNDBell MJ, Shackelford P, Smith R, Schroeder K. Pharmacokinetics of clindamycin phosphate in the first year of life. J Pediatr. 1984 Sep;105(3):482-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80033-5.
PMID: 6470871BACKGROUNDKoren G, Zarfin Y, Maresky D, Spiro TE, MacLeod SM. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous clindamycin in newborn infants. Pediatr Pharmacol (New York). 1986;5(4):287-92.
PMID: 3737273BACKGROUNDDeHaan RM, Schellenberg D. Clindamycin palmitate flavored granules. Multidose tolerance, absorption, and urinary excretion study in healthy children. J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs. 1972 Feb-Mar;12(2):74-83. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1972.tb00149.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 4480976BACKGROUNDDeHaan RM, Metzler CM, Schellenberg D, Vandenbosch WD. Pharmacokinetic studies of clindamycin phosphate. J Clin Pharmacol. 1973 May-Jun;13(5):190-209. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1973.tb00208.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 4488654BACKGROUNDdel Carmen Carrasco-Portugal M, Lujan M, Flores-Murrieta FJ. Evaluation of gender in the oral pharmacokinetics of clindamycin in humans. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2008 Oct;29(7):427-30. doi: 10.1002/bdd.624.
PMID: 18623043BACKGROUNDDeHaan RM, Metzler CM, Schellenberg D, VandenBosch WD, Masson EL. Pharmacokinetic studies of clindamycin hydrochloride in humans. Int J Clin Pharmacol. 1972 Jun;6(2):105-19. No abstract available.
PMID: 4638969BACKGROUNDTownsend RJ, Baker RP. Pharmacokinetic comparison of three clindamycin phosphate dosing schedules. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987 Mar;21(3):279-81. doi: 10.1177/106002808702100310.
PMID: 3569028BACKGROUNDWynalda MA, Hutzler JM, Koets MD, Podoll T, Wienkers LC. In vitro metabolism of clindamycin in human liver and intestinal microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003 Jul;31(7):878-87. doi: 10.1124/dmd.31.7.878.
PMID: 12814964BACKGROUNDGreen B, Duffull S. Caution when lean body weight is used as a size descriptor for obese subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Dec;72(6):743-4. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.129306. No abstract available.
PMID: 12496756BACKGROUNDErstad BL. Which weight for weight-based dosage regimens in obese patients? Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Nov 1;59(21):2105-10. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.21.2105. No abstract available.
PMID: 12434728BACKGROUNDWeiss M. How does obesity affect residence time dispersion and the shape of drug disposition curves? Thiopental as an example. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2008 Jun;35(3):325-36. doi: 10.1007/s10928-008-9090-8. Epub 2008 May 9.
PMID: 18465214BACKGROUNDBerezhkovskiy LM. On the accuracy of estimation of basic pharmacokinetic parameters by the traditional noncompartmental equations and the prediction of the steady-state volume of distribution in obese patients based upon data derived from normal subjects. J Pharm Sci. 2011 Jun;100(6):2482-97. doi: 10.1002/jps.22444. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
PMID: 21254063BACKGROUNDMorrish GA, Pai MP, Green B. The effects of obesity on drug pharmacokinetics in humans. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011 Jun;7(6):697-706. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2011.570331. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
PMID: 21417960BACKGROUNDLeykin Y, Miotto L, Pellis T. Pharmacokinetic considerations in the obese. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Mar;25(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2010.12.002.
PMID: 21516911BACKGROUNDWeinstein AJ, Gibbs RS, Gallagher M. Placental transfer of clindamycin and gentamicin in term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Apr 1;124(7):688-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33336-1.
PMID: 943947BACKGROUNDGonzalez D, Melloni C, Yogev R, Poindexter BB, Mendley SR, Delmore P, Sullivan JE, Autmizguine J, Lewandowski A, Harper B, Watt KM, Lewis KC, Capparelli EV, Benjamin DK Jr, Cohen-Wolkowiez M; Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act - Pediatric Trials Network Administrative Core Committee. Use of opportunistic clinical data and a population pharmacokinetic model to support dosing of clindamycin for premature infants to adolescents. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct;96(4):429-37. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.134. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
PMID: 24949994RESULTGatti G, Flaherty J, Bubp J, White J, Borin M, Gambertoglio J. Comparative study of bioavailabilities and pharmacokinetics of clindamycin in healthy volunteers and patients with AIDS. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 May;37(5):1137-43. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.5.1137.
PMID: 8517703RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Data from 3 different studies was included to increase the robustness of the population PK model developed and leverage all available clindamycin PK data.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kevin Watt, MD
- Organization
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
P. Brian Smith, MD, MHS, MPH
Duke Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin Watt, MD
Duke Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael J Smith, MD
University of Louisville
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2012
First Posted
December 7, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 29, 2016
Results First Posted
October 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10