NCT01743664

Brief Summary

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can be associated to many psychological symptoms. One of the most relevant is the experience of distress related to the disease, that can lead to the development of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). As far as we know there are no studies on the efficacy of psychological treatments in MS in spite of its relevance for patients' quality of life. Primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment with Eyes Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing(EMDR) in PTSD secondary to MS. EMDR is the elective treatment (together with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) for PTSD according to international guidelines. The secondary aims are to evaluate the efficacy of EMDR on the PTSD-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and Quality of Life. The study design is a randomized clinical trial. Sixty patients with MS and PTSD will be pre-screened by using the IES-R and the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale. The patients will be randomized in two groups (30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group).The psychological assessment will be performed in both groups with the same timing and tools: at baseline (T0), after treatment (T1) and 6 months later (T2) by two trained clinical psychologists (independent and blind to treatment) with the CAPS and the administration of self reports: Trauma Antecedent Questionnaire, Chicago Multiscale Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis. The experimental group will undergo 10 weekly sessions of 60 minutes each with EMDR following Shapiro's protocol for traumatic events. The efficacy will be evaluated comparing the results between T0, T1 and T2 and comparing the scores of the experimental and the control groups. Primary outcome measures will be: 1) the proportion of participants at T1 and T2 no longer meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for PTSD; 2) the reduction of CAPS scores for the four PTSD dimensions from pre-treatment to post-treatment evaluation and follow-up (avoidance, reexperiencing the traumatic event, hyperarousal and numbing). Secondary outcome measures will be: comparison of the scores of CMDI, HADS and FAMS of the two groups at T0, T1 and T2. The statistical procedure applied will be a repeated measures analysis of covariance both on the primary outcome continuous measures and on the secondary ones.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2010

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2010

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2012

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 6, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2012

Status Verified

December 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

November 21, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 6, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Posttraumatic Stress DisordersMultiple SclerosisEye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingPsychotherapyAnxietyDepressionQuality of Life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of participants no longer meeting the DSM IV-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD among patients of the experimental group in comparison with those of the control group after the treatment.

    Change from Baseline of number of patients meeting the PTSD DSM IV-TR criteria at 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Reduction in the IES scores after the treatment.

    Reduction from Baseline of IES-R score at 3 months

  • Proportion of participants no longer meeting the DSM IV-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD among patients of the experimental group in comparison with those of the control group at the follow up.

    Change from Baseline of number of patients meeting the PTSD DSM IV-TR criteria at 9 months

  • Reduction in the IES scores at the follow-up.

    Reduction from Baseline of IES-R score at 9 months

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Reduction of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life after the treatment.

    Reduction from baseline of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life at 3 months.

  • Reduction of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life at the follow-up.

    Reduction from baseline of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life at 9 months.

Study Arms (2)

Eye Movement Desesitization Reprocessing

EXPERIMENTAL

The EMDR protocol follows procedures and phases described by Shapiro (1996). This is a complex treatment that incorporates many different interventions in order to recall trauma-related memories and to subdue them. EMDR processing consists of attending to oscillatory stimulation presented in a visual, auditory or tactile modalities, such as moving the finger from side to side across the patient's visual field or presenting an alternating tapping on the hands alternatively. Eye movements are the most commonly used external stimulus, but if the patient has problems with this kind of stimulation, such as headaches or sensomotor deficits, the therapist chooses tapping as an alternative form of oscillatory stimulation with equivalent therapeutic efficacy.

Behavioral: EMDR

relaxation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Relaxation sessions will include diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, visualisation, and rapid relaxation.

Behavioral: Relaxation

Interventions

EMDRBEHAVIORAL

Patients in the experimental group will undergo 10 weekly sessions of 60 minutes each with EMDR following Shapiro's protocol for traumatic events

Eye Movement Desesitization Reprocessing
RelaxationBEHAVIORAL

The patients in the control group will undergo 10 weekly relaxation sessions that include diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, visualization and rapid relaxation.

relaxation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • definite diagnosis of MS (Mc Donald Criteria) evaluated by a neurologist at least six months previously;
  • a relapsing-remitting, primary or secondary progressive disease;
  • clinically inactive phase of the disease;
  • fluent Italian speaker;
  • legal capacity to consent to the treatment;
  • diagnosis of PTSD assessed with the SCID;
  • willingness to suspend all concomitant psychological treatment and suspension of all psychotropic medications at least one month before the treatment or maintenance at baseline level throughout the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • other serious mental disorders, including bipolar disorders, psychotic symptoms, substance abuse, suicidal tendency or cognitive impairment;
  • in corticosteroid treatment during the previous month;
  • with other serious medical disorders in addition to MS.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital

Orbassano, Torino, 10043, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Chalfant AM, Bryant RA, Fulcher G. Posttraumatic stress disorder following diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Trauma Stress. 2004 Oct;17(5):423-8. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048955.65891.4c.

    PMID: 15633921BACKGROUND
  • Bisson JI, Ehlers A, Matthews R, Pilling S, Richards D, Turner S. Psychological treatments for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;190:97-104. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.021402.

    PMID: 17267924BACKGROUND
  • Kangas M, Henry JL, Bryant RA. Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer. A conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 May;22(4):499-524. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00118-0.

    PMID: 12094509BACKGROUND
  • Tedstone JE, Tarrier N. Posttraumatic stress disorder following medical illness and treatment. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003 May;23(3):409-48. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(03)00031-x.

    PMID: 12729679BACKGROUND
  • Ostacoli L, Carletto S, Borghi M, Cavallo M, Rocci E, Zuffranieri M, Malucchi S, Bertolotto A, Zennaro A, Furlan PM, Picci RL. Prevalence and significant determinants of post-traumatic stress disorder in a large sample of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 Jun;20(2):240-6. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9323-2.

  • Carletto S, Borghi M, Bertino G, Oliva F, Cavallo M, Hofmann A, Zennaro A, Malucchi S, Ostacoli L. Treating Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing and Relaxation Therapy. Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 21;7:526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00526. eCollection 2016.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticMultiple SclerosisAnxiety DisordersDepression

Interventions

Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental DisordersDemyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Desensitization, PsychologicBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Pier M Furlan, M.D.

    San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Luca Ostacoli, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery San Luigi Gonzaga

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2012

First Posted

December 6, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 7, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-12

Locations