The Efficacy of EMDR in Patients With PTSD in Multiple Sclerosis
The Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) in Patients With Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Multiple Sclerosis. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can be associated to many psychological symptoms. One of the most relevant is the experience of distress related to the disease, that can lead to the development of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). As far as we know there are no studies on the efficacy of psychological treatments in MS in spite of its relevance for patients' quality of life. Primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment with Eyes Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing(EMDR) in PTSD secondary to MS. EMDR is the elective treatment (together with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) for PTSD according to international guidelines. The secondary aims are to evaluate the efficacy of EMDR on the PTSD-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and Quality of Life. The study design is a randomized clinical trial. Sixty patients with MS and PTSD will be pre-screened by using the IES-R and the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale. The patients will be randomized in two groups (30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group).The psychological assessment will be performed in both groups with the same timing and tools: at baseline (T0), after treatment (T1) and 6 months later (T2) by two trained clinical psychologists (independent and blind to treatment) with the CAPS and the administration of self reports: Trauma Antecedent Questionnaire, Chicago Multiscale Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis. The experimental group will undergo 10 weekly sessions of 60 minutes each with EMDR following Shapiro's protocol for traumatic events. The efficacy will be evaluated comparing the results between T0, T1 and T2 and comparing the scores of the experimental and the control groups. Primary outcome measures will be: 1) the proportion of participants at T1 and T2 no longer meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for PTSD; 2) the reduction of CAPS scores for the four PTSD dimensions from pre-treatment to post-treatment evaluation and follow-up (avoidance, reexperiencing the traumatic event, hyperarousal and numbing). Secondary outcome measures will be: comparison of the scores of CMDI, HADS and FAMS of the two groups at T0, T1 and T2. The statistical procedure applied will be a repeated measures analysis of covariance both on the primary outcome continuous measures and on the secondary ones.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2010
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 7, 2012
December 1, 2012
2.8 years
November 21, 2012
December 6, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of participants no longer meeting the DSM IV-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD among patients of the experimental group in comparison with those of the control group after the treatment.
Change from Baseline of number of patients meeting the PTSD DSM IV-TR criteria at 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Reduction in the IES scores after the treatment.
Reduction from Baseline of IES-R score at 3 months
Proportion of participants no longer meeting the DSM IV-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD among patients of the experimental group in comparison with those of the control group at the follow up.
Change from Baseline of number of patients meeting the PTSD DSM IV-TR criteria at 9 months
Reduction in the IES scores at the follow-up.
Reduction from Baseline of IES-R score at 9 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Reduction of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life after the treatment.
Reduction from baseline of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life at 3 months.
Reduction of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life at the follow-up.
Reduction from baseline of PTS-associated symptoms of anxiety and depression and an improvement in quality of life at 9 months.
Study Arms (2)
Eye Movement Desesitization Reprocessing
EXPERIMENTALThe EMDR protocol follows procedures and phases described by Shapiro (1996). This is a complex treatment that incorporates many different interventions in order to recall trauma-related memories and to subdue them. EMDR processing consists of attending to oscillatory stimulation presented in a visual, auditory or tactile modalities, such as moving the finger from side to side across the patient's visual field or presenting an alternating tapping on the hands alternatively. Eye movements are the most commonly used external stimulus, but if the patient has problems with this kind of stimulation, such as headaches or sensomotor deficits, the therapist chooses tapping as an alternative form of oscillatory stimulation with equivalent therapeutic efficacy.
relaxation
ACTIVE COMPARATORRelaxation sessions will include diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, visualisation, and rapid relaxation.
Interventions
Patients in the experimental group will undergo 10 weekly sessions of 60 minutes each with EMDR following Shapiro's protocol for traumatic events
The patients in the control group will undergo 10 weekly relaxation sessions that include diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, visualization and rapid relaxation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- definite diagnosis of MS (Mc Donald Criteria) evaluated by a neurologist at least six months previously;
- a relapsing-remitting, primary or secondary progressive disease;
- clinically inactive phase of the disease;
- fluent Italian speaker;
- legal capacity to consent to the treatment;
- diagnosis of PTSD assessed with the SCID;
- willingness to suspend all concomitant psychological treatment and suspension of all psychotropic medications at least one month before the treatment or maintenance at baseline level throughout the study.
You may not qualify if:
- other serious mental disorders, including bipolar disorders, psychotic symptoms, substance abuse, suicidal tendency or cognitive impairment;
- in corticosteroid treatment during the previous month;
- with other serious medical disorders in addition to MS.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- San Luigi Gonzaga Hospitallead
- Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multiplacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital
Orbassano, Torino, 10043, Italy
Related Publications (6)
Chalfant AM, Bryant RA, Fulcher G. Posttraumatic stress disorder following diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Trauma Stress. 2004 Oct;17(5):423-8. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048955.65891.4c.
PMID: 15633921BACKGROUNDBisson JI, Ehlers A, Matthews R, Pilling S, Richards D, Turner S. Psychological treatments for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;190:97-104. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.021402.
PMID: 17267924BACKGROUNDKangas M, Henry JL, Bryant RA. Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer. A conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 May;22(4):499-524. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00118-0.
PMID: 12094509BACKGROUNDTedstone JE, Tarrier N. Posttraumatic stress disorder following medical illness and treatment. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003 May;23(3):409-48. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(03)00031-x.
PMID: 12729679BACKGROUNDOstacoli L, Carletto S, Borghi M, Cavallo M, Rocci E, Zuffranieri M, Malucchi S, Bertolotto A, Zennaro A, Furlan PM, Picci RL. Prevalence and significant determinants of post-traumatic stress disorder in a large sample of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 Jun;20(2):240-6. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9323-2.
PMID: 23053829RESULTCarletto S, Borghi M, Bertino G, Oliva F, Cavallo M, Hofmann A, Zennaro A, Malucchi S, Ostacoli L. Treating Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing and Relaxation Therapy. Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 21;7:526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00526. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27148134DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pier M Furlan, M.D.
San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery San Luigi Gonzaga
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2012
First Posted
December 6, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 7, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12