The Anesthetic Effect of Anterior Middle Superior Alveolar Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Anesthesia of the soft and hard tissues in the maxilla may require up to five injections. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy in buccal tissues after the use of the anterior middle superior alveolar (AMSA) and supraperiosteal techniques during subgingival scaling and root planning (SRP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2012
CompletedDecember 5, 2012
December 1, 2012
1.6 years
October 30, 2012
December 2, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of Severity of Pain
Just after the anesthetic injection the scaling and root planing procedure was performed. The patients were followed by thirty minutes after the beginning of the procedure and the patients expressed pain by placing a vertical line on a visual analogue metric scale (VAS: Visual Analog Scale).
30 minutes after the antesthetic injection
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of the discomfort according to gender
30 minutes after the antesthetic injection
Study Arms (2)
Anterior middle superior alveolar
EXPERIMENTALThe AMSA technique was performed in the test group according to Friedman \& Hochman (1997). The needle was introduced with the bevel towards the palate tissue with a 45 ° angle and axially rotated (45° clockwise/45° counterclockwise) and 0.6 ml of the anesthetic was slowly infiltrated for 1 minute. In the control group a supraperiosteal infiltration (infiltrative) at the bottom of the vestibule was performed for one minute and 1.8 ml of anesthetic solution was administrated. This amount of anesthetic was divided into doses of 0.6 ml infiltrated, respectively, in the region of the incisors, canines and premolars. After the anesthetic technique, two minutes were expected for the beginning of the periodontal procedure.
Supraperiosteal technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe supraperiosteal technique at the bottom of the vestibule was performed for one minute and 1.8 ml of anesthetic solution was administrated. This amount of anesthetic was divided into doses of 0.6 ml infiltrated, respectively, in the region of the incisors, canines and premolars. After the anesthetic technique, two minutes were expected for the beginning of the SRP procedure.
Interventions
The AMSA technique is performed according to Friedman \& Hochman (1997). The needle is introduced with the bevel towards the palate tissue with a 45 ° angle and axially rotated (45° clockwise/45° counterclockwise) and 0.6 ml of the anesthetic was slowly infiltrated for 1 minute. In the control group a supraperiosteal infiltration (infiltrative) at the bottom of the vestibule is performed for one minute and 1.8 ml of anesthetic solution is administrated. This amount of anesthetic is divided into doses of 0.6 ml infiltrated, respectively, in the region of the incisors, canines and premolars. After the anesthetic technique, two minutes would be expected for the beginning of the periodontal procedure.
The supraperiosteal technique is performed at the bottom of the vestibule for one minute and 1.8 ml of anesthetic solution is administrated. This amount of anesthetic is divided into doses of 0.6 ml infiltrated, respectively, in the region of the incisors, canines and premolars. After the anesthetic technique, two minutes would be expected for the beginning of the scaling and root planning procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- localized or generalized periodontal disease;
- ≥ 3 teeth with probing depth ≥ 5 mm in anteroposterior teeth in each maxillary dental arch of the maxilla; a minimum of 6 natural teeth in the maxilla (incisors, canines and premolars);
- good overall systemic health and absence of allergy to any component of the anesthetic used.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had any type of systemic condition that counter indicated periodontal treatment;
- Patients who had taken, within the last 72 hours prior to procedure, any central nervous system depressant, such as alcohol, non-opioid and opioid.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
State University of Maringá
Maringá, Paraná, 87020-000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Maurício Araújo, PhD
State University of Maringá
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The anesthetic effect of anterior middle superior alveolar technique (AMSA) for non-surgical periodontal procedures: a randomized controlled clinical study
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2012
First Posted
December 5, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
August 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 5, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12