Comparison of Patient Comfort With the Nasal and Oral Insertion of the Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscope
Randomized Study Comparing the Oral and Nasal Routes for Linear Endobronchial Ultrasound
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine if the insertion of the linear endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscope is more comfortable for patients when done through the nose compared to its insertion through the mouth. Our hypothesis is that nasal insertion is more comfortable.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedSeptember 11, 2013
September 1, 2013
7 months
November 28, 2012
September 10, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient comfort and satisfaction
Measured by a questionnaire using a 10-point Likert scale for both comfort and satisfaction.
Two hours after endobronchial ultrasound
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Physician's assessment of patient comfort
Immediately after the procedure (within 10 minutes)
Duration of endobronchial ultrasound procedure
During the procedure
Total doses of sedation
Immediately after the procedure (within 10 minutes)
Occurence of pneumothorax, bleeding more than 50ml, oxygen desaturation to less than 90%, epistaxis, cardiac arrhythmia
During the procedure and up to two hours after
Proportion of adequate cytology specimens in each group
Days after the procedure (results usually available within 10 days)
Study Arms (2)
Nasal EBUS insertion
OTHERPatients in this arm will undergo a linear endobronchial ultrasound with the bronchoscope inserted through the nose.
Oral EBUS insertion
OTHERPatients in this arm will undergo a linear endobronchial ultrasound with the bronchoscope inserted through the mouth.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients older than 18 years of age
- patients referred for a first linear endobronchial ultrasound
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who previously underwent an EBUS
- Patients intubated with an endotracheal tube
- Patients under the age of 18
- Patients unable to provide informed consent
- Patients currently taking anticoagulants (therapeutic doses of intravenous or subcutaneous heparin, low-molecular weight heparins, direct thrombin inhibitors or other agents)
- Patients taking anti-platelet therapy other than aspirin (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel). A period of 7 days off medication is required before participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Beaudoin S, Martel S, Pelletier S, Lampron N, Simon M, Laberge F, Delage A. Randomized Trial Comparing Patient Comfort Between the Oral and Nasal Insertion Routes for Linear Endobronchial Ultrasound. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2016 Jan;23(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000249.
PMID: 26705010DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stéphane Beaudoin, MD
Laval University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon Martel, MD
Laval University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antoine Delage, MD
Laval University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2012
First Posted
December 5, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09