Prospective Randomized Trial on Comparison of Standard- Carbon Dioxide Pressure Pneumoperitoneum Insufflators Versus AirSeal
AirSeal
A Prospective Randomized Trial on Comparison of Standard- Carbon Dioxide Pressure Pneumoperitoneum Insufflators Versus AirSeal
1 other identifier
interventional
182
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the present trial is to investigate, the mean operative time and to study the frequency and intensity of postoperative shoulder tip pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, i.e. cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery, hernia repair with AirSeal® compared with standard pressure CO2 insufflation systems. The primary hypothesis is that patients operated with AirSeal® have a shorter mean operative time and decreased frequency and intensity of postoperative shoulder tip pain compared with patients undergoing surgery with standard pressure CO2 insufflation systems. It is the secondary objective of the trial to evaluate immunologic and anaesthesiological aspects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery and laparoscopic hernia repair by observing the immune responses and volume of mechanical ventilation of the two groups through measuring various immunologic factors and ventilation volume/CO2 elimination volume. Surgical side effects will also be measured as secondary objective.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 8, 2014
January 1, 2014
1.2 years
November 23, 2012
September 5, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
time of surgery
Time of surgery, expressed in minutes from the time of incising to suturing the skin.
one year
shoulder pain
Postoperative shoulder tip pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS scale).
one year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Immunological aspects
one year
postoperative complications
one year
Other Outcomes (1)
Anaesthesiological aspects
one year
Study Arms (2)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic surgery with AirSeal CO2 pressure insufflation
Group S
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic surgery with standard CO2 pressure insufflation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients recruited for laparoscopic surgery i.e. cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery, hernia repair
- Written informed consent
- ≥ 18 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known immunological dysfunction (advanced liver disease, HIV, hepatitis C virus infection), drug addiction
- ≤18 years of age
- Pregnancy and lactation
- Previous extensive abdominal surgery
- Acute surgical intervention
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz
Linz, Upper Austria, 4010, Austria
Related Publications (3)
Gallioli A, De Lorenzis E, Lievore E, Boeri L, Colombo L, Fontana M, Breda A, Montanari E, Albo G. The Effect of CO2 Pressure and Flow Variation on Carbon Particles Spread During Pneumoperitoneum: An Experimental Study. J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):807-813. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0336. Epub 2022 May 17.
PMID: 34779236DERIVEDLuketina R, Luketina TLH, Antoniou SA, Kohler G, Konneker S, Manzenreiter L, Wundsam H, Koch OO, Knauer M, Emmanuel K. Prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of standard CO2 pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal(R). Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3670-3678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07846-4. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
PMID: 32767145DERIVEDLuketina RR, Knauer M, Kohler G, Koch OO, Strasser K, Egger M, Emmanuel K. Comparison of a standard CO(2) pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jun 20;15:239. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-239.
PMID: 24950720DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ruzica-Rosalia Luketina, MD
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern Linz
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2012
First Posted
December 4, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 8, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01