Neurocognitive Effects of Opiate Agonist Treatment
NEO
2 other identifiers
interventional
135
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to (1) compare the effects of buprenorphine and methadone, two types of opioid addiction treatment, on the ability to think and reason among people addicted to opiates, and who are either HIV negative or HIV positive; and (2) investigate whether HIV infection changes the way opioid treatment affects the ability to think and reason. The investigators hypothesize that there will be (1) significant improvement in thinking and reasoning ability after starting buprenorphine treatment compared to methadone treatment, among participants with and without HIV at 2 and 4 months compared to baseline; and (2) HIV positive participants will demonstrate significant improvement in thinking and reasoning ability at 2 and 4 months compared to baseline, but that their thinking and reasoning ability will still be lower than HIV negative participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 11, 2022
January 1, 2022
4.4 years
November 14, 2012
January 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Global Neurocognitive Function
Metrics: A Global Deficit Score (GDS) is computed by adding deficit ratings of the component test measures, and dividing by total number of measures. (Please see list of component test measures under the Domain-Specific Neurocognitive Function outcome).
2 and 4 months
Domain-Specific Neurocognitive Function (i.e. in the domains of executive functioning, learning, memory, attention/working memory, processing speed, motor, and verbal functioning).
Metrics: Domain Deficit Scores (DDS) are created for each of the 7 cognitive ability domains. Deficit Scores can be analyzed as dichotomous variables to classify individual subjects as impaired or normal, or continuously. Executive Functioning -- Wisconsin Card Sorting Task-64 Item Version; Trail Making Test (Part B) Learning -- Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (Total Recall); Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (Total Recall) Memory -- Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Delayed Recall Trial); Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (Delayed Recall Trial) Attention/Working Memory -- WAIS-III Letter Number Sequencing; PASAT Total Correct Processing Speed -- WAIS-III Digit Symbol; WAIS-III Symbol Search; Trail Making Test (Part A) Motor -- Grooved Pegboard Time (dominant hand); Grooved Pegboard Time (non-dominant hand)\] Verbal Functioning -- Controlled Oral Word Association Test (F-A-S); Semantic (Animal) Fluency
2 and 4 months
Study Arms (2)
Buprenorphine
EXPERIMENTALOral sublingual tablet, 8-32 mg per day, administered daily for duration of 4 months
Methadone
ACTIVE COMPARATOROral sublingual tablet, 60-100 mg per day, administered daily for duration of 4 months
Interventions
Study participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to buprenorphine (experimental/intervention) or methadone (active comparator). We will stratify by HIV status to ensure an equal number of HIV-infected participants in each group.
Study participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to buprenorphine (experimental/intervention) or methadone (active comparator). We will stratify by HIV status to ensure an equal number of HIV-infected participants in each group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 - 68
- English or Spanish speaking
- Documentation of HIV Status
- Opioid-dependent without having received medication treatment for opioid dependence within the previous 90 days
- Negative pregnancy test, for women
- No "street" use of methadone or buprenorphine
- Willing to participate in all study components
- Able to provide informed consent
- Education \> 6 years
- Not acutely intoxicated
You may not qualify if:
- Serious or unstable medical disease: liver disease (AST or ALT ≥ 3x ULN, elevated PT/INR, albumin \<3.0 g/dl or evidence of decompensated cirrhosis);
- Severe cardiovascular disease (MI, PTCA, unstable angina, CABG, and/or serious arrhythmia in the previous 6 months);
- COPD (requiring supplemental oxygen or hospitalization in past 6 months);
- End stage renal disease or creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min
- Neurological disease: head injury with LOC\>24 hour, previous penetrating skull wound, focal brain lesion, history of neurosurgery, seizure disorder (not ETOH-related), non-HIV CNS opportunistic infection
- Psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia or bipolar)
- Benzodiazepine or alcohol dependence
- Chronic pain conditions requiring opioid analgesics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Albert Einstein College of Medicinelead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
- Montefiore Medical Centercollaborator
- Fordham Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Fordham University
The Bronx, New York, 10458, United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
Related Publications (1)
Scott TM, Arnsten J, Olsen JP, Arias F, Cunningham CO, Rivera Mindt M. Neurocognitive, psychiatric, and substance use characteristics in a diverse sample of persons with OUD who are starting methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid treatment programs. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Oct 24;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00272-4.
PMID: 34689841DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julia Arnsten, MD, MPH
Montefiore Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2012
First Posted
November 27, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01