Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant for Recurrent Nasal Polyps
RESOLVE
A Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant Used in Post-Sinus Surgery Patients With Recurrent Sinus Obstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
19
Brief Summary
The RESOLVE Study is a randomized controlled trial with the S8 Sinus Implant in 100 chronic sinusitis patients with recurrent nasal polyps.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 20, 2018
CompletedJuly 20, 2018
July 1, 2018
10 months
November 14, 2012
April 16, 2018
July 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score
Nasal Obstruction by patients using a paper questionnaire on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in
90 days
Bilateral Polyp Grade
Polyp grade was determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review. Each sinus was graded from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in bilateral polyp grade.
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction
90 days
Bilateral Polyp Grade
90 days, 6 months
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score
6 months
Percentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)
90 days, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
S8 Sinus Implant
EXPERIMENTALIn-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily
Control
SHAM COMPARATORIn-office bilateral sham procedure Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily
Interventions
In-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses
Two sprays in each nostril once daily, totaling 200 mcg of mometasone furoate throughout Day 90
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has provided written informed consent using a form approved by the reviewing IRB.
- Patient is ≥ 18 years of age.
- Patient is willing and able to comply with protocol requirements.
- Patient has a previous confirmed diagnosis of CS defined as inflammation of the mucosa of the paranasal sinuses.
- Patient has undergone bilateral total ethmoidectomy (must be at least 90 day beyond the date of last sinus surgery).
- Patient has recurrent bilateral sinus obstruction due to polyposis (Grades 1 through 3 only).
- Patient must have a Grade 2 polyposis on at least 1 ethmoid side.
- Patient is able to tolerate the use of Nasonex topical intranasal steroid spray once daily.
- Patient is indicated for a repeat ESS per the study definition. Patient must have: (i) a minimum symptom burden on the SNOT 22, consisting of a minimum score of 2 on at least 2 of the 5 hallmark symptoms of CS (nasal blockage, post-nasal discharge, thick nasal discharge, facial pain/pressure, and decreased sense of smell); (ii) persistent symptoms of CS despite ongoing treatment with topical intranasal steroid irrigations or sprays at least once daily for at least 2 weeks preceding enrollment; (iii) had treatment with a high-dose form of steroids (e.g., oral, parenteral, injection into polyps) and/or sinus steroid irrigations within the preceding 2 years, or refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; (iv) a known history of repeated courses of treatment with aggressive steroid therapy for recurrent sinusitis; and (v) endoscopic evidence of polyp recurrence, scarring, and/or obstructive mucosal edema.
- Patient is able to tolerate use of topical/local anesthesia and the implant procedure in an office or clinic setting.
- In the opinion of the physician, treatment with S8 Sinus Implant or sham procedure is technically feasible (able to pass 5-9 mm device into middle meatus) bilaterally.
- Female patients of child-bearing potential must not be pregnant and must agree to not become pregnant during the course of the study.
- Female patients of child-bearing potential must agree to use consistent and acceptable method/s of birth control during the course of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Candidates were excluded if they met ANY of the following criteria:
- Patient had bilateral total ethmoidectomy less than 90 days previously.
- Patient had Propel implanted postoperatively less than 90 days previously.
- Patient has presence of adhesions/synechiae Grades 3 or 4.
- Patient has presence of severe scarring or adhesions within the ethmoid cavity itself.
- Patient has presence of Grade 4 polyposis.
- Patient has known history of immune deficiency (e.g., IGG\] subclass deficiency or IGA deficiency, HIV).
- Patient has concurrent condition requiring active chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy management for the disease (e.g., cancer, HIV, etc.).
- Patient has oral-steroid dependent condition such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma or other condition.
- Patient has known history of allergy or intolerance to corticosteroids or mometasone furoate (MF).
- Patient has known history of resistance or poor response to oral steroids.
- Patient has presence of physical obstruction that would preclude access to either ethmoid sinus for device delivery (e.g., severe septal deviation, septal spur, very small middle meatus, total obstruction of the nasal passage with severe scarring, polyposis).
- Patient has clinical evidence of acute bacterial sinusitis (e.g., acute increase in purulent discharge, fever, facial pain etc.).
- Patient has clinical evidence or suspicion of invasive fungal sinusitis (e.g., bone erosion on prior CT scan, necrotic sinus tissue, etc.).
- Patient has evidence of disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments during the 6 month follow-up period.
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Intersect ENTlead
Study Sites (19)
California Sinus Centers
Atherton, California, 94027, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Sinus Center of Excellence
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Sacramento Ear, Nose and Throat
Sacramento, California, 95815, United States
Colorado Ear, Nose, Throat & Allergy
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909, United States
South Florida ENT Associates
Miami, Florida, 33176, United States
ENT of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Northwestern University, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Advanced ENT & Allergy
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207, United States
Summit Medical Group
Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, 07922, United States
Albany ENT & Allergy Services
Albany, New York, 12206, United States
ENT and Allergy Associates
Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States
Piedmont Ear, Nose & Throat Associates
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Oregon Health and Science University-Dept. of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Bethlehem ENT Specialty Physicians Associates
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18017, United States
University of Pennsylvania, Dept of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Intermountain Ear, Nose & Throat Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102, United States
Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Otolaryngology
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53266, United States
Related Publications (2)
Han JK, Forwith KD, Smith TL, Kern RC, Brown WJ, Miller SK, Ow RA, Poetker DM, Karanfilov B, Matheny KE, Stambaugh J, Gawlicka AK. RESOLVE: a randomized, controlled, blinded study of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Nov;4(11):861-70. doi: 10.1002/alr.21426. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
PMID: 25266981BACKGROUNDForwith KD, Han JK, Stolovitzky JP, Yen DM, Chandra RK, Karanfilov B, Matheny KE, Stambaugh JW, Gawlicka AK. RESOLVE: bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis after sinus surgery: 6-month outcomes from a randomized, controlled, blinded study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jun;6(6):573-81. doi: 10.1002/alr.21741. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
PMID: 26992115RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. Absence of defined medical regimen prior to enrollment 2. Investigators grading polyps and assessing indication for RESS were not blinded 3. Indication for RESS at baseline allowed for 1 sinus side to have polyp grade \>=1
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James Stambaugh, Vice President of Clinical & Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Intersect ENT, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith D Forwith, MD
Advanced ENT and Allergy
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph K Han, MD
Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Otolaryngology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants were blindfolded and earmuffed during the baseline procedure and follow-up endoscopic examinations. Implants were removed at Day 60 to allow blinded assessment of bilateral polyp grade at Day 90 by a centralized videoendoscopy review by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2012
First Posted
November 26, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 20, 2018
Results First Posted
July 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan