Evaluation of a TAP Block Given During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery to Help Control Pain
TAP Block
Evaluation of a TAP Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Multi-institution Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
79
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients experience pain after surgery mostly from their abdominal wounds, even when those wounds are small. Decreasing that pain has many benefits. It improves comfort, decreases stress response and might improve the outcome of the surgery. Local anesthesia (which is a numbing agent given directly at the site of pain via a needle) is given to decrease the pain that is felt after surgery and decrease the need for strong pain medications which can have negative side effects. One promising way to give local pain medication is called the "transversus abdominis plane" or TAP block. This method works by directly blocking the nerves in the abdomen that are the cause of the pain patients feel in their incision after surgery. This is done by injecting a numbing agent (Bupivacaine) into the area of their abdomen where their nerves are located that cause pain. In the case of nerves that carry sensation, bupivacaine blocks the pain sensation traveling in a particular nerve. Patients will be randomized (like a flip of a coin) to receive either a normal saline injection or the bupivacaine injection. The purpose of this study will be to prove the effectiveness of local anesthetic given via a TAP block in improving postoperative pain, decreasing the use of pain medications, decreasing postoperative nausea and vomiting and improve surgical outcomes such as hospital length of stay in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 3, 2022
CompletedNovember 3, 2022
September 1, 2022
2.1 years
October 19, 2012
July 21, 2022
October 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain as Measured by Pain Score
Pain measured via score of 1 to 5, with 1 being no pain and 5 being the worst pain
up to 10 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percent of Analgesics Used as Measured by Patient Report
Up to 30 days after surgery
Other Outcomes (3)
Number of Nausea/Vomiting Episodes
up to 10 days
Length of Hospital Stay
up to 10 days
Day of Return of Bowel Function
daily after surgery until discharge up to 10 days
Study Arms (2)
bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORbupivacaine-0.5ml/kg of 25% bupivacaine for maximum of 30ml
normal saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORNormal saline placebo-0.5ml/kg of 0.9% normal saline (max of 30ml)to mimic bupivacaine
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who have benign or malignant colonic or rectal disease that are being scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal resection.
- Subjects who are 18 years of age and older
- Subjects of either sex
- Subjects who are willing and able to adhere to protocol requirements, agree to participate in the study program and provide written and informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who undergo conversion to the open approach will be excluded from the analysis, as the block will be given at the end of the procedure and is being evaluated for laparoscopic cases.
- Subjects who are pregnant.
- Subjects with a medical condition that may interfere with the use of the study medication Bupivicaine.
- Subjects who have another condition or general disability or infirmity that in the opinion of the investigator precludes further participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Conor Delaney
- Organization
- Cleveland Clinic Florida Region
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Conor P Delaney, MD.,PhD
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2012
First Posted
November 22, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 3, 2022
Results First Posted
November 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09