NCT00752817

Brief Summary

Laparoscopic Colectomy is an advanced minimally invasive procedure that requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Minimally invasive surgery offers many advantages to the patients but exposes the surgeon to new challenges, many of which are human factor in nature. This in turn prolongs the learning curve and has delayed the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the management of patients with colorectal disease. Virtual reality simulation offers an effective way of training whereby surgical trainees can train repeatedly and achieve proficiency in a shorter time and a safe environment.

Trial Health

47
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2008

Geographic Reach
2 countries

10 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2008

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2008

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2009

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

October 7, 2008

Status Verified

October 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

September 11, 2008

Last Update Submit

October 6, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

Virtual RealitySimulatorProficiencyLaparoscopicColectomyEducationSurgical Training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Subjects randomised to train under a proficiency-based simulation curriculum (SC) will perform laparoscopic assisted colectomy faster, complete more surgical steps and commit fewer operative errors compared to subjects randomised to the control group

    6-12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • We aim to set the institutional and national proficiency level for Laparoscopic Assisted Colectomy (LAC) using the ProMIS-LAC simulator from Haptica, Ireland.

    30 days

Study Arms (2)

SC

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects (surgical trainees) randomised to train under a proficiency-based progression virtual reality simulation curriculum

Other: Proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training

CC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects (surgical trainees) randomised to the current surgical training curriculum

Other: Training under the current surgical training programme

Interventions

Subjects (surgical trainees) will be trained under a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training programme before performing their first live case

Also known as: Simulation Curriculum, SC
SC

Subjects (surgical trainees) will continue to train under the current training methodology offered at their institution before they perform their first live case.

Also known as: Current Curriculum, CC
CC

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Classified as year 3-5 post graduation registrars, specialist registrars or residents in surgery.
  • Completed their Basic Surgical Training programme.
  • Completed at least 12 months period on a Higher Surgical Training programme.
  • In an accredited surgical post at time of participation
  • In a colorectal surgery rotation at time of participation
  • Signed their own consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Performed, as primary surgeon, \> 10 advanced laparoscopic procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia, appendectomy, Nissen fundoplication, or ventral incisional hernia repair are not considered advanced laparoscopic procedures )
  • Performed, as primary surgeon, laparoscopic assisted colectomy procedures
  • Performed, as primary surgeon, any hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy procedures
  • Did not sign their own consent form
  • Indicated for a laparoscopic assisted sigmoid colectomy or high anterior resection
  • At least 18 years old upon date of signing the informed consent document (ICD)
  • Sign their own ICD
  • History or current diagnosis of synchronous colon cancer
  • Indicated for urgent surgery
  • Indicated for diverting stoma
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Classification of Physical Status IV-V
  • Tumour classified as T4
  • An obstructed colon
  • Planned early conversion based on findings at operative visualisation.
  • Pregnancy
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Mercy University Hospital

Cork, Ireland

RECRUITING

AMNCH

Dublin, 24, Ireland

RECRUITING

St. Vincent's University Hospital

Dublin, 4, Ireland

RECRUITING

Beaumont Hospital

Dublin, 9, Ireland

RECRUITING

AMNCH

Dublin, Co. Dublin, Ireland

RECRUITING

Tullamore general hospital

Tullamore, Co Offaly, Ireland

RECRUITING

Antrim Area Hospital

Antrim, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Gartnavel General Hospital

Glasgow, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Leicester Royal Infirmary Hospital

Leicester, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Freeman Hospital

Newcastle, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (35)

  • Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA 3rd, Ramel S, Smith CD, Arvidsson D. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050.

    PMID: 17512301BACKGROUND
  • Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy. 1998 Sep;30(7):617-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001366.

    PMID: 9826140BACKGROUND
  • Crothers IR, Gallagher AG, McClure N, James DT, McGuigan J. Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration. Endoscopy. 1999 Jun;31(5):365-9. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-26.

    PMID: 10433045BACKGROUND
  • Ritter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, Enochsson L, Smith CD. Perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor abilities correlate with duration of training required on a virtual-reality flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg. 2006 Sep;192(3):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.03.003.

    PMID: 16920434BACKGROUND
  • Fried MP, Satava R, Weghorst S, Gallagher AG, Sasaki C, Ross D, Sinanan M, Uribe JI, Zeltsan M, Arora H, Cuellar H. Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i19-26. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i19.

    PMID: 15465950BACKGROUND
  • Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):364-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80.

    PMID: 15650649BACKGROUND
  • Van Sickle KR, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1227-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8274-6. Epub 2005 Jul 21.

    PMID: 16025195BACKGROUND
  • Delaney CP. Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Feb;51(2):181-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9126-y. Epub 2008 Jan 4.

    PMID: 18175188BACKGROUND
  • Lordan JT, Tilney HS, Shirol S, Jourdan I, Gudgeon AM. Does the laparoscopic colorectal surgery learning curve adversely affect the results of colorectal cancer resection? A 3-year prospective study in a district general hospital. Colorectal Dis. 2008 May;10(4):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01332.x. Epub 2007 Oct 19.

    PMID: 17949448BACKGROUND
  • Ridgway PF, Boyle E, Keane FB, Neary P. Laparoscopic colectomy is cheaper than conventional open resection. Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):819-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01221.x. Epub 2007 Mar 7.

    PMID: 17477851BACKGROUND
  • Suzuki S, Eto K, Hattori A, Yanaga K, Suzuki N. Surgery simulation using patient-specific models for laparoscopic colectomy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:464-6.

    PMID: 17377327BACKGROUND
  • Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):372-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9047-3. Epub 2004 Feb 2.

    PMID: 14752634BACKGROUND
  • Haque S, Srinivasan S. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006 Jan;10(1):51-8. doi: 10.1109/titb.2005.855529.

    PMID: 16445249BACKGROUND
  • Munz Y, Almoudaris AM, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Liddle AD, Darzi AW. Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):774-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.022.

    PMID: 17512295BACKGROUND
  • Satava RM. Surgical education and surgical simulation. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1484-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0134-0.

    PMID: 11760753BACKGROUND
  • Seymour NE. Integrating simulation into a busy residency program. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14(4):280-6. doi: 10.1080/13645700500272421.

    PMID: 16754176BACKGROUND
  • Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):771-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f61b09.

    PMID: 17968168BACKGROUND
  • Hedman L, Strom P, Andersson P, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L. High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task. Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0036-6. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

    PMID: 16865624BACKGROUND
  • Boller AM, Nelson H. Colon and rectal cancer: laparoscopic or open? Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Nov 15;13(22 Pt 2):6894s-6s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1138.

    PMID: 18006796BACKGROUND
  • Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, Casillas S, Kiran RP, Brady KM, Fazio VW. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):975-81. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0941-0.

    PMID: 15793638BACKGROUND
  • Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H; Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762.

    PMID: 17893502BACKGROUND
  • Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM; UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758.

    PMID: 17634484BACKGROUND
  • Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Pahlman L; Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298.

    PMID: 17372057BACKGROUND
  • Daetwiler S, Guller U, Schob O, Adamina M. Early introduction of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy during residency. Br J Surg. 2007 May;94(5):634-41. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5638.

    PMID: 17330835BACKGROUND
  • Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006 Aug;93(8):921-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5430.

    PMID: 16845692BACKGROUND
  • Moore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg. 1995 Jul;170(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80252-9.

    PMID: 7793496BACKGROUND
  • Haluck RS, Gallagher AG, Satava RM, Webster R, Bass TL, Miller CA. Reliability and validity of Endotower, a virtual reality trainer for angled endoscope navigation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:179-84.

    PMID: 15458082BACKGROUND
  • Satava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):203-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00594110.

    PMID: 8503081BACKGROUND
  • Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ, McManus IC, Darzi A. Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;50:124-30.

    PMID: 10180527BACKGROUND
  • Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008.

    PMID: 12368674BACKGROUND
  • Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4407.

    PMID: 14760660BACKGROUND
  • Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P. Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Oct;46(10):1371-8; discussion 1378-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6752-5.

    PMID: 14530677BACKGROUND
  • Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC. Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Feb;44(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02234296.

    PMID: 11227938BACKGROUND
  • Cowie R. Measurement and modelling of perceived slant in surfaces represented by freely viewed line drawings. Perception. 1998;27(5):505-40. doi: 10.1068/p270505.

    PMID: 10070553BACKGROUND
  • Noldus LP, Trienes RJ, Hendriksen AH, Jansen H, Jansen RG. The Observer Video-Pro: new software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Feb;32(1):197-206. doi: 10.3758/bf03200802.

    PMID: 10758678BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Paul Neary, MD, FRCSI

    Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Musallam A Al-Akash, MBBS, MRCSI

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2008

First Posted

September 15, 2008

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion

June 1, 2009

Study Completion

September 1, 2009

Last Updated

October 7, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-10

Locations