Creating a Proficiency-Based Virtual Reality Simulation Training Programme for Laparoscopic Assisted Colectomy
LAC
Creating and Implementing a Proficiency-Based Progression Virtual Reality Training Programme for Higher Surgical Trainees for Laparoscopic Assisted Sigmoid Colectomy.
1 other identifier
interventional
16
2 countries
10
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic Colectomy is an advanced minimally invasive procedure that requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Minimally invasive surgery offers many advantages to the patients but exposes the surgeon to new challenges, many of which are human factor in nature. This in turn prolongs the learning curve and has delayed the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the management of patients with colorectal disease. Virtual reality simulation offers an effective way of training whereby surgical trainees can train repeatedly and achieve proficiency in a shorter time and a safe environment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedOctober 7, 2008
October 1, 2008
9 months
September 11, 2008
October 6, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subjects randomised to train under a proficiency-based simulation curriculum (SC) will perform laparoscopic assisted colectomy faster, complete more surgical steps and commit fewer operative errors compared to subjects randomised to the control group
6-12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
We aim to set the institutional and national proficiency level for Laparoscopic Assisted Colectomy (LAC) using the ProMIS-LAC simulator from Haptica, Ireland.
30 days
Study Arms (2)
SC
EXPERIMENTALSubjects (surgical trainees) randomised to train under a proficiency-based progression virtual reality simulation curriculum
CC
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects (surgical trainees) randomised to the current surgical training curriculum
Interventions
Subjects (surgical trainees) will be trained under a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training programme before performing their first live case
Subjects (surgical trainees) will continue to train under the current training methodology offered at their institution before they perform their first live case.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Classified as year 3-5 post graduation registrars, specialist registrars or residents in surgery.
- Completed their Basic Surgical Training programme.
- Completed at least 12 months period on a Higher Surgical Training programme.
- In an accredited surgical post at time of participation
- In a colorectal surgery rotation at time of participation
- Signed their own consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Performed, as primary surgeon, \> 10 advanced laparoscopic procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia, appendectomy, Nissen fundoplication, or ventral incisional hernia repair are not considered advanced laparoscopic procedures )
- Performed, as primary surgeon, laparoscopic assisted colectomy procedures
- Performed, as primary surgeon, any hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy procedures
- Did not sign their own consent form
- Indicated for a laparoscopic assisted sigmoid colectomy or high anterior resection
- At least 18 years old upon date of signing the informed consent document (ICD)
- Sign their own ICD
- History or current diagnosis of synchronous colon cancer
- Indicated for urgent surgery
- Indicated for diverting stoma
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Classification of Physical Status IV-V
- Tumour classified as T4
- An obstructed colon
- Planned early conversion based on findings at operative visualisation.
- Pregnancy
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Royal College of Surgeons, Irelandlead
- Health Service Executivecollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Mercy University Hospital
Cork, Ireland
AMNCH
Dublin, 24, Ireland
St. Vincent's University Hospital
Dublin, 4, Ireland
Beaumont Hospital
Dublin, 9, Ireland
AMNCH
Dublin, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Tullamore general hospital
Tullamore, Co Offaly, Ireland
Antrim Area Hospital
Antrim, United Kingdom
Gartnavel General Hospital
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary Hospital
Leicester, United Kingdom
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle, United Kingdom
Related Publications (35)
Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA 3rd, Ramel S, Smith CD, Arvidsson D. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050.
PMID: 17512301BACKGROUNDGallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy. 1998 Sep;30(7):617-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001366.
PMID: 9826140BACKGROUNDCrothers IR, Gallagher AG, McClure N, James DT, McGuigan J. Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration. Endoscopy. 1999 Jun;31(5):365-9. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-26.
PMID: 10433045BACKGROUNDRitter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, Enochsson L, Smith CD. Perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor abilities correlate with duration of training required on a virtual-reality flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg. 2006 Sep;192(3):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.03.003.
PMID: 16920434BACKGROUNDFried MP, Satava R, Weghorst S, Gallagher AG, Sasaki C, Ross D, Sinanan M, Uribe JI, Zeltsan M, Arora H, Cuellar H. Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i19-26. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i19.
PMID: 15465950BACKGROUNDGallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):364-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80.
PMID: 15650649BACKGROUNDVan Sickle KR, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1227-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8274-6. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
PMID: 16025195BACKGROUNDDelaney CP. Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Feb;51(2):181-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9126-y. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
PMID: 18175188BACKGROUNDLordan JT, Tilney HS, Shirol S, Jourdan I, Gudgeon AM. Does the laparoscopic colorectal surgery learning curve adversely affect the results of colorectal cancer resection? A 3-year prospective study in a district general hospital. Colorectal Dis. 2008 May;10(4):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01332.x. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
PMID: 17949448BACKGROUNDRidgway PF, Boyle E, Keane FB, Neary P. Laparoscopic colectomy is cheaper than conventional open resection. Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):819-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01221.x. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
PMID: 17477851BACKGROUNDSuzuki S, Eto K, Hattori A, Yanaga K, Suzuki N. Surgery simulation using patient-specific models for laparoscopic colectomy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:464-6.
PMID: 17377327BACKGROUNDHernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):372-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9047-3. Epub 2004 Feb 2.
PMID: 14752634BACKGROUNDHaque S, Srinivasan S. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006 Jan;10(1):51-8. doi: 10.1109/titb.2005.855529.
PMID: 16445249BACKGROUNDMunz Y, Almoudaris AM, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Liddle AD, Darzi AW. Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):774-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.022.
PMID: 17512295BACKGROUNDSatava RM. Surgical education and surgical simulation. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1484-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0134-0.
PMID: 11760753BACKGROUNDSeymour NE. Integrating simulation into a busy residency program. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14(4):280-6. doi: 10.1080/13645700500272421.
PMID: 16754176BACKGROUNDAggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):771-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f61b09.
PMID: 17968168BACKGROUNDHedman L, Strom P, Andersson P, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L. High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task. Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0036-6. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
PMID: 16865624BACKGROUNDBoller AM, Nelson H. Colon and rectal cancer: laparoscopic or open? Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Nov 15;13(22 Pt 2):6894s-6s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1138.
PMID: 18006796BACKGROUNDDelaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, Casillas S, Kiran RP, Brady KM, Fazio VW. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):975-81. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0941-0.
PMID: 15793638BACKGROUNDFleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H; Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762.
PMID: 17893502BACKGROUNDJayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM; UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758.
PMID: 17634484BACKGROUNDBonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Pahlman L; Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298.
PMID: 17372057BACKGROUNDDaetwiler S, Guller U, Schob O, Adamina M. Early introduction of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy during residency. Br J Surg. 2007 May;94(5):634-41. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5638.
PMID: 17330835BACKGROUNDReza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006 Aug;93(8):921-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5430.
PMID: 16845692BACKGROUNDMoore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg. 1995 Jul;170(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80252-9.
PMID: 7793496BACKGROUNDHaluck RS, Gallagher AG, Satava RM, Webster R, Bass TL, Miller CA. Reliability and validity of Endotower, a virtual reality trainer for angled endoscope navigation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:179-84.
PMID: 15458082BACKGROUNDSatava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):203-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00594110.
PMID: 8503081BACKGROUNDTaffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ, McManus IC, Darzi A. Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;50:124-30.
PMID: 10180527BACKGROUNDSeymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008.
PMID: 12368674BACKGROUNDGrantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4407.
PMID: 14760660BACKGROUNDDincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P. Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Oct;46(10):1371-8; discussion 1378-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6752-5.
PMID: 14530677BACKGROUNDSchlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC. Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Feb;44(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02234296.
PMID: 11227938BACKGROUNDCowie R. Measurement and modelling of perceived slant in surfaces represented by freely viewed line drawings. Perception. 1998;27(5):505-40. doi: 10.1068/p270505.
PMID: 10070553BACKGROUNDNoldus LP, Trienes RJ, Hendriksen AH, Jansen H, Jansen RG. The Observer Video-Pro: new software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Feb;32(1):197-206. doi: 10.3758/bf03200802.
PMID: 10758678BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Neary, MD, FRCSI
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2008
First Posted
September 15, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 7, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-10