Examining How Motor Rehabilitation Promotes Brain Reorganization Following Stroke, an MRI Study
Examining Mechanisms of Neuroplasticity Following Motor Rehabilitation in Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) is a highly efficacious treatment for residual motor disability in chronic stroke. Its effectiveness is believed to be due, at least in part, to the therapy's ability to aid the brain in "rewiring itself." For example, CI therapy produces increases in the amount of grey matter (the parts of the brain where neuron cell bodies are most closely clustered) in certain areas of the human brain (Gauthier et al., 2008). The cellular and molecular mechanisms that are responsible for this increase in grey matter volume are not known, however. Thus, it is unclear how the therapy helps brains "rewire" themselves. This study aims to better understand the timecourse and cellular/molecular nature of brain changes during CI therapy. Because there is currently no way to directly measure cellular/molecular changes in the brain noninvasively, this study will infer what is happening on a microstructural level using new MRI techniques (three dimensional pictures of the brain). For example, by charting the timecourse of grey matter changes during CI therapy, and cross-comparing this to what is known about the timecourses of different cellular/molecular processes, the investigators can gain a greater understanding of what cellular processes may be responsible for increases in grey matter. The investigators will gain additional information about which cellular processes are important for rehabilitation-induced improvement by measuring larger-scale changes (e.g., amount of blood flow through different brain areas) that accompany cellular changes. The investigators are hopeful that by better understanding how CI therapy can change the brain, the effectiveness of rehabilitation can be improved upon. For example, insight into the mechanisms of rehabilitation-induced brain change may suggest particular drug targets to increase brain plasticity. This study will help us better understand how the brain repairs itself after injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2025
CompletedAugust 3, 2025
July 1, 2025
5 years
November 6, 2012
July 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Brain structure
Assessed via dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, diffusion tensor MRI, MRI-based myelin mapping, T1-weighted MRI
Participants will be followed for 4-6 weeks. Change in brain structure at mid-treatment (after 1 week of CI therapy), post-treatment (after 2 weeks of therapy), and at 2-week follow-up will be measured.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Motor function
Participants will be followed for 4-6 weeks. Change in motor function at mid-treatment (after 1 week of CI therapy), post-treatment (after 2 weeks of therapy), and at 2-week follow-up will be measured.
Study Arms (2)
Immediate CI therapy
EXPERIMENTALDelayed CI therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females 18 years of age and over
- Experienced a stroke resulting in mild to moderate hemiparesis (some residual motor function, e.g. able to pick up a washcloth placed flat on a table) at least 6 months prior to enrollment. Suggested active range of motion criteria for this level of impairment include: 45° shoulder abduction and flexion, 20° elbow extension, 20° wrist extension, and 10° extension of thumb and fingers.
- Preserved ability to comprehend and participate in basic elements of the therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent participation in other experimental trials for treatment of motor dysfunction
- Having received botulinum toxin injection within the past 3 months
- Previous intensive rehabilitation in the chronic phase post-stroke
- Serious/uncontrolled medical problems (e.g., dementia, severe pain, end-stage or degenerative diseases)
- Kidney disease as evidenced by eGFR\<60
- Anemia
- Sickle cell disease
- History of kidney transplant
- Other evidence/history of renal disease
- Pregnancy
- Implanted metallic parts of implanted electronic devices, including pacemakers, defibrillators, aneurism clip or implant medication pump that are MRI incompatible
- An implanted brain stimulator
- Permanent tattoo (e.g., eye liner) containing metallic coloring
- Claustrophobia precluding MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Publications (2)
Rafiei MH, Kelly KM, Borstad AL, Adeli H, Gauthier LV. Predicting Improved Daily Use of the More Affected Arm Poststroke Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Phys Ther. 2019 Dec 16;99(12):1667-1678. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz121.
PMID: 31504952DERIVEDKelly KM, Borstad AL, Kline D, Gauthier LV. Improved quality of life following constraint-induced movement therapy is associated with gains in arm use, but not motor improvement. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Oct;25(7):467-474. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1481605. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
PMID: 30246613DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yousef Hannawi, MD
Ohio State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor- Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2012
First Posted
November 14, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Study Completion
July 10, 2025
Last Updated
August 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07