Autism Intervention Research Network for Behavioral Health (AIR-B II): Deployment Into Elementary Schools
AIR-B II
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The primary goal of this study is to identify efficacious and cost effective intervention strategies that can improve academic and psychological outcomes for children with ASD, and can be feasibly be implemented at fidelity by school personnel in under served elementary schools. Two simultaneous interventions will occur. In intervention 1, students with ASD in inclusion classrooms will be randomized to the Playground Intervention or a waitlist control group. In the Playground Intervention, UCLA/ROC/UPENN staff will work with school personals (teachers, paraprofessionals) to increase peer engagement on the yard. In intervention 2, students in special day classes will be randomized to the 'Schedule Tools Activities Transitions' Intervention (STAT) or wait-list control. In the STAT Intervention, UCLA/ROC/UPENN staff will work with teachers to implement behavioral strategies in the classrooms. In both interventions, the conditions are: 1) Immediate treatment, where the training will begin immediately after baseline measures are completed. 2) Wait-list treatment, where the training will begin the follow school year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 25, 2014
September 1, 2014
1.6 years
November 5, 2012
September 22, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Playground Intervention: Playground Peer Engagement
Playground Intervention: Peer Observation of Playground Engagement (POPE) measure. Peer interactions on the playground will be coded using an interval-observation schedule of every 40 seconds (with 20 second coding intervals). Interactive levels or states will be noted along with the presence or absence of discrete interactive behaviors during each coding interval.
Change from baseline to exit (12 weeks later) in the POPE
Playground Intervention: Playground Peer Engagement
Playground Intervention: Peer Observation of Playground Engagement (POPE) measure. Peer interactions on the playground will be coded using an interval-observation schedule of every 40 seconds (with 20 second coding intervals). Interactive levels or states will be noted along with the presence or absence of discrete interactive behaviors during each coding interval.
Change from exit to follow up (3 months later) in the POPE
Playground Intervention: Social Network Salience
Playground Intervention: Social Network measure. Based on the Cairns' (1994) method, participants will be asked to list all the names of children in their class who hang out together; this free-recall method is used rather than asking respondents to place each peer's name in a group, because the relative strength of students' tendency to recall classmates is an important indicator of the peers' prominence in the social structure.
Change from baseline to exit (12 weeks later) in Playground Intervention Social Network
Playground Intervention: Social Network Salience
Playground Intervention: Social Network Measure. Based on the Cairns' (1994) method, participants will be asked to list all the names of children in their class who hang out together; this free-recall method is used rather than asking respondents to place each peer's name in a group, because the relative strength of students' tendency to recall classmates is an important indicator of the peers' prominence in the social structure.
Change from exit to follow up (3 months later) in Playground Intervention Social Network
STAT Intervention: Teacher Behaviors and Student's Engagement in the Classrooms
STAT Intervention: The Classroom Observational Measure is an adaptive observational measure designed to capture teacher behaviors and student behaviors in the classroom that includes teacher's praises, behavioral control and student's on/off task behaviors.
Change from Baseline to Exit (6 weeks later) in STAT Intervention: Classroom Observational Measure
STAT Intervention: Teacher Behaviors and Student's Engagement in the Classrooms
STAT Intervention: The Classroom Observational Measure is an adaptive observational measure designed to capture teacher behaviors and student behaviors in the classroom that includes teacher's praises, behavioral control and student's on/off task behaviors.
Change from Exit to Follow Up (3 months later) in STAT Intervention: Classroom Observational Measure
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Playground Intervention: Teachers Ratings of Intervention Implementation
Exit (12 weeks from Baseline)
Playground Intervention: Teacher's Perceptions of Intervention
Change from baseline to exit (12 weeks later) in Playground Intervention Teacher Perception of Intervention
STAT Intervention: Teacher Nominated Target Behaviors
Change from baseline to exit (6 weeks later) in STAT Intervention: Teacher Nominated Target Behaviors
STAT Intervention: Teacher Nominated Target Behaviors
Change from Exit to Follow Up (3 months later) in STAT Intervention Classroom Observational Measure
Playground Intervention Teacher's Perceptions of Intervention
Change from exit to follow up (3 months later) in Playground Intervention Teacher Perception of Intervention
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Playground Intervention School Personnel Acceptability
Change from Baseline to Exit (12 weeks later) in Acceptability of Playground Intervention
Playground Intervention: School Personnel Buy In of Intervention
Exit (12 weeks from baseline)
Playground Intervention: School Personnel Acceptability of Intervention
Change from Exit to Follow Up (3 months later) in Acceptability of Playground Intervention
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Playground Intervention
EXPERIMENTALSchools will be randomized to one of two conditions. The conditions are: 1) Immediate treatment, where the training will begin immediately after baseline measures are completed 2) Waitlist treatment, where the training will begin the following school year. The initial delivery will occur for 30 minutes three times for a period of two to three weeks, then 30 minutes two times for a period of two weeks, then 30 minutes once a week for up to 16 sessions, within a period of 3 months, then a 30 minute follow up will occur 3 months later. A systematic fading of intervention using performance feedback, coaching, and consultation. Outcome measures will be administered at entry, end of treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Entry diagnostic, exit and follow up assessments will last 1.5- 2 hours and participants will be assessed after school or in their homes.
STAT Intervention
EXPERIMENTALClassrooms will be randomized to one of two conditions. The conditions are: 1) Immediate treatment, where the training will begin immediately after baseline measures are completed. 2) Waitlist treatment, where the training will begin the following school year. The intervention will be over a period of 6 weeks, with baseline, treatment, and a follow up visit totaling 18 weeks at the school site. Each visit is approximately 30 minutes. A systematic fading of intervention using performance feedback, coaching, and consultation. Outcome measures will be administered at entry, end of treatment. Entry diagnostic, exit and follow up assessments will last 1.5- 2 hours and participants will be assessed after school or in their homes.
Playground Waitlist Control
NO INTERVENTIONWaitlist Control
STAT Waitlist Control
NO INTERVENTIONWaitlist Control
Interventions
Intervention is designed for children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) included in a regular education k through fifth grade classroom for at least 50% of the school day. Schools will be randomized to one of two conditions. The conditions are: 1) Immediate treatment, where the training will begin immediately after baseline measures are completed. 2) Waitlist treatment, where the training will begin the following school year. This study will take place at school. All intervention activities will be conducted during recess or lunch where children with autism may have the most difficulty interacting with peers. A total of 14-16 intervention sessions will be held with the child with autism, school personnel, and the child's classmates. The intervention will last approximately 3 months with a 3-month follow-up.
This study will track the behavioral progress of children whose teachers receive training in these instructional methods. This study also will examine the ability and willingness of teachers to use these methods as they were designed. The study will last approximately 18 weeks (6 weeks of intervention, and a 3 month follow up visit). This study will take place at school. Classrooms will be randomized to one of two conditions. The conditions are: 1) Immediate treatment, where the training will begin immediately after baseline measures are completed. 2) Waitlist treatment, where the training will begin the following school year. All intervention activities will be conducted with a teacher during the school day but not during instructional time. Study staff will visit the school on a weekly basis to train your child's teacher on evidence-based strategies for teaching children with autism.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult: School teachers and paraprofessionals working with children with ASD.
You may not qualify if:
- Child: Participants will be excluded from the study if child has co-morbid disorders such as cerebral palsy, Fragile X, Down syndrome. Child has profound vision or hearing lose.
- Adult: Participants will be excluded from the study if the adult is not a teacher, administrator, teaching assistant, yard attendant, related services provider, or a paraprofessional.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)lead
- University of Rochestercollaborator
- University of Pennsylvaniacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
UCLA Semel Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90024, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
UPENN Map Center for Mental Health Policy and Services Research
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-2648, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Connie Kasari, Ph.D
University of California, Los Angeles
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Mandell, Sc.D
University of Pennsylvania
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tristram Smith, Ph.D
University of Rochester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2012
First Posted
November 9, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09