Percutaneous Tracheostomy - Systematic Comparison Among Three Methods: Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Percutaneous tracheostomy is routinely performed in most intensive care units in the world.Several studies have shown that the procedure is safe and economically efficient in comparison to open surgical operation in the operating room. In our institution as in a number of institutions in the country, it is acceptable to perform the operation by placing the tube on a high position near the vocal cords by direct laryngoscopy and then puncturing the trachea with a needle, by location of the anatomy by palpation of the neck. Using technological aids, such as direct sonography and bronchoscopy in real time may significantly reduce the rate of complications as a result of performing percutaneous tracheostomy. So far, no systematic comparison has been made among the three methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 14, 2012
November 1, 2012
3 years
November 4, 2012
November 13, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Systematic comparison
a systematic comparison among the three methods of percutaneous tracheostomy in terms of safety: minor and major periprocedural morbidity and mortality, up to 30 days.
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Minor morbidity
3 years
Study Arms (3)
Direct laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPerforming percutaneous tracheostomy as accepted in our institute: By placing the tube higher up near the vocal cords by direct laryngoscopy. In the second stage tracheal perforation by a needle will be carried out by palpation of the anatomical placement of the neck.
Real time sonography
ACTIVE COMPARATORPercutaneous tracheostomy will be guided by real time sonography (with the visualization of the needle path) using acoustic shadows of the cricoid and the tracheal rings. In both methods, in order to identify the anatomic location of the needle prick- after passing the guide wire, the front elevation will be verified by optical means, which will be drawn out immediately afterwards.
Bronchoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPercutaneous tracheostomy will be guided by bronchoscopy. Initially, the tube will be placed according to the desired height observed by the bronchoscope, phase two will be tracheal perforation by a needle under trans illumination and real-time view on the income of the needle and the passage of the guide wire.
Interventions
Three methods of percutaneous tracheostomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All intubated patients with various injuries requiring percutaneous tracheostomy (in- house and out- house patients)
- Minimal age 18
You may not qualify if:
- No patient consent for participation.
- Anatomical problem which does not allow for percutaneous tracheostomy and requires open procedure in the operating room.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick Sorkine, professor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2012
First Posted
November 7, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 14, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11