Characterization and Sequential Pharmacotherapy of Severe Mood Dysregulation
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project will characterize children and adolescents with severe mood dysregulation (SMD) and conduct a pilot study of combination pharmacotherapy as a basis for future intervention trials. Eligible participants assessed for SMD will have 4 weeks open titration with lisdexamfetamine (LDX) to optimal dose, followed by double-blind randomization to fluoxetine (N=25) or placebo (N=25) in combination with optimized LDX for an additional 8 weeks. Participants will be monitored for clinical response and adverse events. Specific aims are: #1: To define youth meeting SMD criteria in terms of psychiatric comorbidity, neurocognitive functioning, and a potential "bio-signature" derived from electroencephalography (EEG). Specific hypotheses to be tested include: 1) that SMD participants will differ in comparison to non-SMD individuals in our pre-existing database on patterns of a) psychiatric comorbidity, b) symptoms, c) behavioral ratings, and d) neurocognitive functioning, and 2) that a distinct EEG bio-signature will be confirmed in individuals formally diagnosed with SMD. #2: To conduct a preliminary study of sequential pharmacotherapy for SMD with a stimulant followed by randomized, placebo-controlled selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment and enrollment and assess the suitability of the proposed combination treatment as a basis for future clinical investigations. Specific hypotheses to be tested include: 1) that significant improvement in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement -SMD (CGI-I-SMD) scores and other secondary measures are evident after open-label LDX titration; 2) that participants randomized to fluoxetine will demonstrate additional significant improvement in CGI-I-SMD scores and other secondary measures in comparison to participants randomized to placebo; 3) that combination LDX and SSRI therapy is safe and well tolerated, and 4) that EEG profiles will normalize with treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 26, 2018
CompletedFebruary 26, 2018
January 1, 2018
3.4 years
October 20, 2012
December 7, 2017
January 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Global Impression-Severity-Severe Mood Dysregulation
A dimensional clinician rating of overall SMD related impairment, modified by the National Institute of Mental Health to assess specific domains pertinent to Severe Mood Dysregulation. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 7. Higher scores means greater impairment.
Baseline through week 12.
Secondary Outcomes (13)
ADHD-IV Rating Scale
Baseline through week 12.
Conners Parent Global Index
Baseline through week 3.
Conners Global Index Emotional Lability Subscale - Parent Report
Baseline to week 3.
Conners Global Index Restless-Impulsive Subscale Parent Report
Baseline through week 3.
Conners Teacher Global Index
Baseline through week 3.
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale
Baseline through week 12.
Children's Depression Rating Scale
Baseline through week 12.
Affective Reactivity Index Child Report
Baseline through week 12.
Study Arms (3)
Adjunctive fluoxetine
EXPERIMENTALParticipants previously titrated with open-label lisdexamfetamine randomized to adjunctive fluoxetine at end of study week 4.
Adjunctive placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants previously titrated with open-label lisdexamfetamine randomized to adjunctive placebo at end of study week 4.
Open Lisdexamfetamine Titration
OTHERAll participants initially titrated with open-label lisdexamfetamine from baseline to end of study week 4.
Interventions
Titration and open label treatment from baseline visit for 12 week study.
Initiated at end of study week 4 and continued to study week 12.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female participants, ages 7-17 years.
- Abnormal mood (specifically anger, sadness, and/or irritability), present at least half of the day most days and of sufficient severity to be noticeable in the child's environment (e.g. parents, teachers, peers).
- Hyperarousal, as defined by at least three of the following symptoms: insomnia, agitation, distractibility, racing thoughts or flight of ideas, pressured speech, intrusiveness.
- Compared to his/her peers, the child exhibits markedly increased reactivity to negative emotional stimuli that is manifest verbally and/or behaviorally. For example, the child responds to frustration with extended temper tantrums (inappropriate for age and/or precipitating event), verbal rages, and/or aggression toward people or property. Such events occur, on average, at least three times a week.
- Criteria 2, 3, and 4 are currently present and have been present for at least 12 months without any symptom free periods exceeding two months.
- The onset of symptoms must be prior to age 12 years.
- The symptoms are severe in at least one setting (e.g. violent outbursts, extreme verbal abuse, assaultiveness at home, school, or with peers). In addition. There are at least mild symptoms (distractibility, intrusiveness) in a second setting.
- Score \> 9 on either the Inattentive or Hyperactive/Impulsive subscales of the baseline ADHD-RS.
- Score \< 12 on the irritability subscale of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. -
You may not qualify if:
- As evidenced in the mania section of the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, the individual exhibits any of these cardinal bipolar symptoms in distinct periods lasting more than 1 day, and therefore meets criteria for bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (NOS):
- i) Elevated or expansive mood. ii) Grandiosity or inflated self esteem. iii) Decreased need for sleep. iv) Increase in goal-directed activity (this can result in the excessive involvement in pleasurable activities that have a high potential for painful consequences).
- Meets criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform, schizoaffective illness, PTSD, or conduct disorder.
- T-score greater than/equal to 60 on baseline Social Responsiveness Scale
- Meets criteria for substance use disorder in the three months prior to baseline.
- Full scale intelligence \< 70.
- The symptoms are due to the direct physiological effects of drug abuse, or to a general medical or neurological condition.
- Currently pregnant or lactating, or sexually active without using an acceptable method of contraception.
- Failed an adequate trials (defined as four weeks of consecutive treatment at the minimally effective dose) or severe ill effects while on therapeutic doses of SSRI therapy.
- Hypersensitivity or severe adverse reaction to methylphenidate.
- History of fainting after exercise, syncope, a young family with sudden cardiac death, or known structural heart defect.
- A serious history of adverse reactions (psychosis, severely increased activation compared to baseline) to methylphenidate or amphetamines.
- Any chronic medical condition that requires medication that is contraindicated with SSRI or stimulant therapy, or any serious chronic or unstable medical disorder.
- Medical contraindication to treatment with SSRI or stimulant therapy. -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeleslead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
- Shirecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UCLA Semel Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study was designed as an initial feasibility and proof of concept trial. Initial power analysis suggested need to randomize N=50 participants. Recruitment was much more difficult than expected, leading to small sample size.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James J. McGough, M.D.
- Organization
- University of California, Los Angeles
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James J McGough, M.D.
University of California, Los Angeles
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Clinical Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2012
First Posted
October 25, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 26, 2018
Results First Posted
February 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01