Circulating Tumor Cells and Cytology in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients Clinically Suspected for Leptomeningeal Metastases
Determining the Sensitivity and Specificity of Circulating Tumor Cells and Cytology in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients Clinically Suspected for Leptomeningeal Metastases
1 other identifier
interventional
146
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the quantitative detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with Epcam expressing tumors can be used compared to standard qualitative method - cytology both in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients, clinically suspected for leptomeningeal metastases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 6, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 19, 2017
CompletedJanuary 22, 2021
January 1, 2021
4 years
October 22, 2012
January 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Determine the sensitivity and specificity of detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with Epcam expressing tumors compared to cytology in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients, clinically suspected for leptomeningeal metastases
3 months after end of study
Secondary Outcomes (6)
- To determine the relationship between the number of CTCs in CSF and the patient's neurological condition and WHO performance score
3 months after end of study
- To determine the change in the CTC number between two sampling points and correlate this with the patient's neurological condition and therapy
3 months after end of study
- To determine the relationships between demographics/tumor status and CTCs number in CSF.
3 months after end of study
- To determine the relationship between the CTC cells in the CSF and the CTCs in the peripheral blood
3 months after end of study
To confirm EPCAM positivity in archived primary tumor tissue and tumorcells in CSF.
3 months after end of study
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
diagnostic
OTHERUsing extra CSF material received by clinically indicated lumbar punctures to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CTCs in CSF (5ml CSF). Standard material of 5 ml CSF for cytology and 2 ml CSF for cell count and chemistry is being regularly used and processed.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are treated for advanced EpCam positive solid tumors (such as breast cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer)
- Age \>= 18 years;
- Able and willing to give written informed consent;
- WHO performance status (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4);
- Able and willing to undergo lumbar puncture and veni-puncture.
You may not qualify if:
- Lumbar puncture not clinically / diagnostically indicated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Dutch Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Amsterdam, 1066CX, Netherlands
Slotervaart Hospital
Amsterdam, 1066EC, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Milojkovic Kerklaan B, Pluim D, Bol M, Hofland I, Westerga J, van Tinteren H, Beijnen JH, Boogerd W, Schellens JH, Brandsma D. EpCAM-based flow cytometry in cerebrospinal fluid greatly improves diagnostic accuracy of leptomeningeal metastases from epithelial tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Jun;18(6):855-62. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov273. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
PMID: 26566655DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
D. Brandsma, MD, PhD
NKI-AvL
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2012
First Posted
October 25, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 6, 2016
Study Completion
September 19, 2017
Last Updated
January 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01