Local Anaesthesia vs Regional Block for Arteriovenous Fistulae
Does Regional Compared to Local Anaesthesia Influence Outcome After Arteriovenous Fistula Creation?
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
End stage renal failure (ESRF)describes an irreversible loss in renal function. The majority of these patients will opt for haemodialysis (HD)as their chosen method of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the optimal method of achieving vascular access to permit HD. AVF are created with a small surgical procdure to join the artery and vein together. Over the next 6- 8weeks after surgery the AVF should grow ("mature") into a vessel suitable for needles to be inserted for dialysis. Unfortunately however, around 24% - 35% of AVF fail at an early stage. Some anaesthetic techniques can influence intraoperative blood flow and venous diameter, factors which are associated with fistula success. There remains no conclusive evidence that any particular anaesthetic technique can significantly influence long term surgical outcome. This study aims to investigate whether a regional, compared to local, anaesthetic technique can affect fistula patency.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 15, 2012
October 1, 2012
2 years
October 3, 2012
October 11, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary patency
Primary patency defined as unequivocal maturation to permit cannulation with thrill and bruit without intervention (Y/N)
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Immediate Patency
1 hours post-operatively
Primary patency
1 month, 1year
Functional patency
1, 3 and 12 months
Secondary patency
3 and 12 months
Ultrasound flows in brachial artery
Pre-/post anaesthetic, 1, 3 and 12 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Local anaesthetic
ACTIVE COMPARATORInfiltration of local anaesthetic into the surgical site by the surgeon using a combination of 0.5% L-bupivicaine prior to incision and 1% lignocaine topically after the wound is opened. Maximum dose limits of 2mg/kg for bupivicaine, and 3mg/kg for lignocaine will be observed, recognising that these are additive.
Regional anaesthetic
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound guided brachial plexus block. Supraclavicular will be the block performed unless there is a contraindication in which case axillary block may be used. A 1:1 mixture of 0.5% L-bupivicaine and 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline (1 in 200,000) will be injected, up to a volume of 40ml but using a minimum of 25ml. Maximum dose limits of 2mg for bupivicaine and 7mg/kg for lignocaine with adrenaline will be observed, recognising that these are additive.
Interventions
Infiltration of local anaesthetic into the surgical site by the surgeon using a combination of 0.5% L-bupivicaine prior to incision and 1% lignocaine topically after the wound is opened. Maximum dose limits of 2mg/kg for bupivicaine, and 3mg/kg for lignocaine will be observed, recognising that these are additive.
Ultrasound guided brachial plexus block. Supraclavicular will be the block performed unless there is a contraindication in which case axillary block may be used. A 1:1 mixture of 0.5% L-bupivicaine and 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline (1 in 200,000) will be injected, up to a volume of 40ml but using a minimum of 25ml. Maximum dose limits of 2mg for bupivicaine and 7mg/kg for lignocaine with adrenaline will be observed, recognising that these are additive.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English-speaking
- Adult patients \>18 years old
- Competent to give consent
- Scheduled for primary AVF formation at either radial or brachial artery.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to local anaesthetic.
- Coagulopathy
- Infection at the anaesthetic or surgical site.
- Patient preference for general or alternative anaesthesia
- Significant peripheral neuropathy or neurologic disorder affecting the upper extremity
- Pregnancy
- Previous AVF creation
- Known cephalic vein occlusion, central vein stenosis, brachial or radial artery stenosis
- Vein or artery less than 1.8mm, as measured by ultrasound
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emma Aitkenlead
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clydecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Renal Surgery, Western Infirmary
Glasgow, G116NY, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Aitken E, Kearns R, Gaianu L, Jackson A, Steven M, Kinsella J, Clancy M, Macfarlane A. Long-Term Functional Patency and Cost-Effectiveness of Arteriovenous Fistula Creation under Regional Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1871-1882. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019111209. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
PMID: 32709710DERIVEDAitken E, Jackson A, Kearns R, Steven M, Kinsella J, Clancy M, Macfarlane A. Effect of regional versus local anaesthesia on outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1067-1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30948-5. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
PMID: 27492881DERIVEDMacfarlane AJ, Kearns RJ, Aitken E, Kinsella J, Clancy MJ. Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation? Trials. 2013 Aug 19;14:263. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-263.
PMID: 23958289DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Clancy, MBBS FRCS
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Research Fellow Department of Renal Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2012
First Posted
October 15, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 15, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10