NCT01862679

Brief Summary

The most common forms of renal replacement therapy currently in use are high flux haemodialysis (HF-HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF). Although these techniques appear similar to the patient, there are important differences in what happens to the blood as it travels through the dialysis machine. During HDF, the machine controls hydrostatic pressure across the dialyser to remove additional water together with toxins from the blood and this fluid volume is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. HDF has a theoretical advantage removing more waste substances, especially larger molecules, from the blood than HF-HD which may be of benefit to the patient in the medium to long term.Despite the theoretical advantages, trials have so far been unable to find any significant difference in death rates or the development of health problems among patients on HDF or HF-HD. It is therefore important to examine other factors which may help doctors and patients to decide which treatment to use. The investigators have designed a study which aims to answer three main questions:

  1. 1.Does HDF make patients feel better?
  2. 2.Is blood pressure more stable on HDF in comparison with HF-HD?
  3. 3.Are Phosphate levels and other blood parameters better controlled with HDF than HF-HD?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 24, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

June 7, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 22, 2013

Last Update Submit

June 6, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in the average time taken to fully recover post dialysis

    Self-assessment by patient of hours/mins to full recovery after dialysis

    Baseline compared 8 week treatment point

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Number of symptomatic hypotension events

    Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks

  • Number of dialysis circuit clotting events

    Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks

  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of potassium

    Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of phosphate

    Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of vitamin B12.

    Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

8 weeks HF haemodialysis / 8 weeks HD-filtration

EXPERIMENTAL

8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis followed by 8 weeks haemodiafiltration

Other: High-flux haemodialysisProcedure: Haemodiafiltration

8 weeks HD-filtration /8 weeks HF haemodialysis

EXPERIMENTAL

8 weeks haemodiafiltration followed by 8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis

Other: High-flux haemodialysisProcedure: Haemodiafiltration

Interventions

High-flux haemodialysis is the standard dialysis modality currently in use in the UK

8 weeks HD-filtration /8 weeks HF haemodialysis8 weeks HF haemodialysis / 8 weeks HD-filtration

During Haemodiafiltration, the dialysis machine removes more water from the blood than during "normal" hemodialysis. The additional liquid is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. Thus, the machine exchanges a high volume of fluid during treatment and removes the liquid together with toxins from the blood.

8 weeks HD-filtration /8 weeks HF haemodialysis8 weeks HF haemodialysis / 8 weeks HD-filtration

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Receiving HF-HD for at least 3 months
  • Reliable vascular access (i.e. use of the same fistula, graft or tunnelled central venous catheter for at least 1 month)
  • Aged 18 or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently receiving HDF
  • Emergency hospital admissions within the preceding 4 weeks
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months
  • Neoplasia
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Unable to perform QoL questionnaire or self report recovery post-dialysis time

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NHS Greater Glasgow andClyde

Glasgow, G12 0XH, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Chronic

Interventions

Hemodiafiltration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal DialysisRenal Replacement TherapyTherapeuticsSorption DetoxificationHemofiltrationExtracorporeal CirculationSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Robert MacTier, Md, FRCP

    NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2013

First Posted

May 24, 2013

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

March 1, 2014

Study Completion

March 1, 2014

Last Updated

June 7, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Locations