Randomised Study of High-flux Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration
Single Blind, Prospective, Randomised Comparative Study of High-flux Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The most common forms of renal replacement therapy currently in use are high flux haemodialysis (HF-HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF). Although these techniques appear similar to the patient, there are important differences in what happens to the blood as it travels through the dialysis machine. During HDF, the machine controls hydrostatic pressure across the dialyser to remove additional water together with toxins from the blood and this fluid volume is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. HDF has a theoretical advantage removing more waste substances, especially larger molecules, from the blood than HF-HD which may be of benefit to the patient in the medium to long term.Despite the theoretical advantages, trials have so far been unable to find any significant difference in death rates or the development of health problems among patients on HDF or HF-HD. It is therefore important to examine other factors which may help doctors and patients to decide which treatment to use. The investigators have designed a study which aims to answer three main questions:
- 1.Does HDF make patients feel better?
- 2.Is blood pressure more stable on HDF in comparison with HF-HD?
- 3.Are Phosphate levels and other blood parameters better controlled with HDF than HF-HD?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedJune 7, 2016
June 1, 2016
8 months
April 22, 2013
June 6, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the average time taken to fully recover post dialysis
Self-assessment by patient of hours/mins to full recovery after dialysis
Baseline compared 8 week treatment point
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Number of symptomatic hypotension events
Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks
Number of dialysis circuit clotting events
Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of potassium
Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of phosphate
Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of vitamin B12.
Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
8 weeks HF haemodialysis / 8 weeks HD-filtration
EXPERIMENTAL8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis followed by 8 weeks haemodiafiltration
8 weeks HD-filtration /8 weeks HF haemodialysis
EXPERIMENTAL8 weeks haemodiafiltration followed by 8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis
Interventions
High-flux haemodialysis is the standard dialysis modality currently in use in the UK
During Haemodiafiltration, the dialysis machine removes more water from the blood than during "normal" hemodialysis. The additional liquid is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. Thus, the machine exchanges a high volume of fluid during treatment and removes the liquid together with toxins from the blood.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Receiving HF-HD for at least 3 months
- Reliable vascular access (i.e. use of the same fistula, graft or tunnelled central venous catheter for at least 1 month)
- Aged 18 or older
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving HDF
- Emergency hospital admissions within the preceding 4 weeks
- Life expectancy less than 6 months
- Neoplasia
- Unable to give informed consent
- Unable to perform QoL questionnaire or self report recovery post-dialysis time
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NHS Greater Glasgow andClyde
Glasgow, G12 0XH, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robert MacTier, Md, FRCP
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2013
First Posted
May 24, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06