NCT01700153

Brief Summary

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a major cause of impairments in child population. This disease justifies an intensive and prolonged multidisciplinary rehabilitation which can be optimised by robotics. Our team has developed a robot designed to rehabilitate the child's upper limb. This robot allows the patient to perform active, passive, or assisted exercises. This therapy is designed to promote motor development in children with CP. Its finality is to improve patients' quality of life and participation. Several pilot studies evaluated the efficacy of robotic assisted therapy in children with CP but none RCT has been done. Then, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of robotic-assisted therapy in children with cerebral palsy by evaluating the 3 fields of the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) and performing a prospective randomized controlled single blind trial. Therefore, all patients will benefit from a classical rehabilitation as a basis. Furthermore, patients of the control and experimental groups will receive a supplement of classical rehabilitation and robotic-assisted therapy, respectively.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2012

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2012

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2012

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 8, 2013

Status Verified

May 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

September 26, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Robotic-assisted therapycerebral palsyICF

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Kinematic

    Change from Baseline in Kinematic at an expected average of 3 months and 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Manual Ability Classification System

    Change from Baseline in manual ability at an expected average of 3 months and 6 months

  • Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test

    Change from Baseline in quality of upper extremity skills at an expected average of 3 months and 6 months

  • Box and Block test

    Change from Baseline in dexterity at an expected average of 3 months and 6 months

  • strength

    Change from Baseline in strength at an expected average of 3 months and 6 months

  • Abilhand-Kids scale

    Change from Baseline in activity of daily living at an expected average of 3 months and 6 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental: Robotic-assisted therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

All patients will receive a similar classical rehabilitation as a basis. the 10 patients of this group will receive a supplement of robotic-assisted therapy.

Other: Robotic-assisted therapyOther: Classical therapy

Classical therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All patients will receive a similar classical rehabilitation as a basis. the 10 patients of this group will receive a supplement of classical rehabilitation.

Other: Classical therapy

Interventions

This robotic device is designed to intensively rehabilitate the upper limb. Indeed, this robot allows the patient to perform a lot of active, passive, or assisted exercises. The level of assistance is determined and provided by the robot in function of the patient capacity.

Experimental: Robotic-assisted therapy

conventional therapy will be performed by therapists specialized in neuro-pediatric rehabilitation

Classical therapyExperimental: Robotic-assisted therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Cerebral palsy (hemi, quadri or di-plegia)
  • MACS \> 1/5 (moderate to severe impairments)

You may not qualify if:

  • Botulinum toxin injection in the upper limb muscles
  • Intrathecal Baclofen for the upper limb spasticity
  • an unstable clinical condition contraindicating the upper limb rehabilitation treatments
  • cognitive disorders preventing the understanding of the instructions
  • other neurological or orthopedic pathology affecting the upper limb.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut royal de l'accueil du handicap moteur

Brussels, 1200, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Bax MC, Flodmark O, Tydeman C. Definition and classification of cerebral palsy. From syndrome toward disease. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:39-41. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17370481BACKGROUND
  • Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, Katz RC, Lamberty K, Reker D. Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):e100-43. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000180861.54180.FF. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16120836BACKGROUND
  • Ward NS. The neural substrates of motor recovery after focal damage to the central nervous system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Dec;87(12 Suppl 2):S30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.334.

    PMID: 17140877BACKGROUND
  • Aisen ML, Kerkovich D, Mast J, Mulroy S, Wren TA, Kay RM, Rethlefsen SA. Cerebral palsy: clinical care and neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Sep;10(9):844-52. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70176-4.

    PMID: 21849165BACKGROUND
  • Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub2.

    PMID: 17943893BACKGROUND
  • Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, Armani M. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;88(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032.

    PMID: 17270510BACKGROUND
  • Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jun;23(5):505-14. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331148. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

    PMID: 19237734BACKGROUND
  • Mehrholz J, Hadrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub3.

    PMID: 22696362BACKGROUND
  • Krebs HI, Ladenheim B, Hippolyte C, Monterroso L, Mast J. Robot-assisted task-specific training in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;51 Suppl 4:140-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03416.x.

    PMID: 19740222BACKGROUND
  • Fasoli SE, Fragala-Pinkham M, Hughes R, Hogan N, Krebs HI, Stein J. Upper limb robotic therapy for children with hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;87(11):929-36. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818a6aa4.

    PMID: 18936558BACKGROUND
  • Frascarelli F, Masia L, Di Rosa G, Cappa P, Petrarca M, Castelli E, Krebs HI. The impact of robotic rehabilitation in children with acquired or congenital movement disorders. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;45(1):135-41.

    PMID: 19293759BACKGROUND
  • Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic management of upper-limb dysfunction in children with congenital hemiplegia. Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e1111-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3335. Epub 2009 May 18.

    PMID: 19451190BACKGROUND
  • Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rosblad B, Beckung E, Arner M, Ohrvall AM, Rosenbaum P. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jul;48(7):549-54. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001162.

    PMID: 16780622BACKGROUND
  • Klingels K, De Cock P, Desloovere K, Huenaerts C, Molenaers G, Van Nuland I, Huysmans A, Feys H. Comparison of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test in hemiplegic CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Dec;50(12):904-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03123.x. Epub 2008 Sep 20.

    PMID: 18811701BACKGROUND
  • Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jul;75(7):751-5.

    PMID: 8024419BACKGROUND
  • Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.

    PMID: 3809245BACKGROUND
  • Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, Detrembleur C, Sapin J, Dehez B, Stoquart G. A robotic device as a sensitive quantitative tool to assess upper limb impairments in stroke patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Mar;44(3):210-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0926.

    PMID: 22367455BACKGROUND
  • Arnould C, Penta M, Renders A, Thonnard JL. ABILHAND-Kids: a measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Neurology. 2004 Sep 28;63(6):1045-52. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000138423.77640.37.

    PMID: 15452296BACKGROUND
  • Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J. Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Phys Ther. 1990 Oct;70(10):602-10. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.10.602.

    PMID: 2217539BACKGROUND
  • Noreau L, Lepage C, Boissiere L, Picard R, Fougeyrollas P, Mathieu J, Desmarais G, Nadeau L. Measuring participation in children with disabilities using the Assessment of Life Habits. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Sep;49(9):666-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00666.x.

    PMID: 17718822BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Maxime Gilliaux, PhD student

    Université Catholique de Louvain

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2012

First Posted

October 4, 2012

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

May 8, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-05

Locations