Efficacy of New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Patients With Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common childhood motor disability. Weakness, spasticity, and loss of dexterity are the major problems in patients with CP. A novel virtual cycling training (VCT) program for lower limb was to enhance promising muscle strength through promoting the participant compliance and motivation. Sensory electrical stimulation(SES) of whole hand is a novel technique and is commonly used to treatment of spasticity for patients with stroke. Constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is a method for treating developmental disregard and learned non-use of affected limb and improving motor efficiency, functional performance, and activities of daily living for patients with CP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedJune 7, 2018
November 1, 2017
4.7 years
September 18, 2013
June 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
change from baseline of muscle tone of the upper limb muscles in 12 and 24 weeks
muscle tone of the upper limb muscles assessment by Modified Ashworth Scale and Myoton( © 2011 Myoton AS.).
baseline, 12weeks, 24weeks
change from baseline of Basic motor abilities in 12 and 24 weeks
Basic motor abilities included the assessments of the Bruininks- Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency II (BOT II), Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2), Quality of upper extremity skills test (QUEST). The measure is a composite.
baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
change from baseline of basic motor functions in 12 and 24 weeks
baseline, 12weeks, 24weeks
change from baseline of quality of life in 12 and 24 weeks
baseline, 12weeks, 24weeks
change from baseline of activities of daily living (ADL) in 12 and 24 weeks
baseline, 12weeks, 24weeks
change from baseline of participation in 12 and 24 weeks
baseline, 12weeks, 24 weeks
change from baseline of bone mineral density in 12 and 24 weeks
baseline, 12weeks, 24weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
SES group
EXPERIMENTALSES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.
VCT group
EXPERIMENTALVCT group received the VCT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise.
VRCIT group
EXPERIMENTALVRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day.
traditional rehabilitation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORShame control group received the shame SES and traditional rehabilitation programs.
Interventions
SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove for 20-30 minutes and arm with wrap for 20-30 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300 us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 40-50 Hz.
The UE VCT programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise. The warm-up and cool-down exercises involved stretching and relaxing the head, neck, and the upper and lower body.
VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation, conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day. The functional training of the more affected UE focused on massive practice of functional activities using the more affected arm, with the principles of shaping and repetitive task practice applied during training.
The absence of muscle contractions was controlled by the investigator the sham stimulation was carried out identically, but the stimulation amplitude was set to 0 milliampere(mA). Subjects were not informed about the stimulation level and were instructed to distract attention from the stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis with spastic CP with Gross Motor Function Classification System(GMFCS) levels I-IV
- aged 3-20 years
- ability to undergo clinical assessment
- ability to comprehend commands and cooperate during an examination
You may not qualify if:
- chromosomal abnormalities
- progressive neurological disorder or severe concurrent illness or disease not typically associated with CP
- active medical conditions such as pneumonia or poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
- any major surgery or nerve block in the preceding 3 months
- metabolic or hormonal disturbance
- cardiovascular disorder
- poor tolerance or a poor cooperation during assessment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, 333, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Chia-Ling Chen, MD,PhD
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2013
First Posted
January 17, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share