Study Stopped
Study design determined to be not likely feasible
Pilot Study Comparing Treatment With Dexmedetomidine to Midazolam for Symptom Control in Advanced Cancer Patients
Dexmedetomidine Compared to Midazolam for Symptom Control in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cancer patients with very difficult to control symptoms at the Abbotsford (AC) and Fraser Valley (FVC) Cancer Centers are referred and admitted to the Tertiary Palliative Care Units at the Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Center(ARHCC). For symptom management, patients are sometimes given midazolam continuously through a needle placed underneath the skin. While effective in symptom management, midazolam can be sedating, leaving patients unable to interact with loved ones in their last days. This study is a pilot project. Before proceeding to a full-scale study, a "pilot study" or "feasibility study" is often carried out first to test the design of a study, the likelihood of successful recruitment or the acceptability of the intervention to potential subjects. The basic idea is to find out whether it will be practical to proceed to a larger study that will include more subjects. This type of study involves only a small number of subjects and therefore the results can only be used as a guide for further larger studies. The investigators also will determine whether palliative care cancer patients taking a medication called dexmedetomidine would have improved rousability (more easily and fully awakened) and symptom control (pain, shortness of breath, nausea or confusion) compared with those taking standard of care which is receiving the medication midazolam. The use of dexmedetomidine in other clinical situations (in the Operating Room or Intensive Care Unit where the patient can still respond to the doctor) has been shown to be effective in symptom control and to provide a better degree of rousability to patients but has not been well studied in the palliative care environment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Nov 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedMay 25, 2015
January 1, 2013
2 years
August 29, 2012
May 22, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of subjects needed to recruit for a multicenter double blind randomized controlled phase III trial comparing dexmedetomidine to midazolam for symptom control in advanced cancer patients
Sample size determination for significant improvement in: * Pain * Dyspnea * Nausea * Delirium * Rousability
one year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in pain (0 to 10 numerical scale)
Up to 10 days
Change in dyspnea (0 to 10 numerical scale)
Up to 10 days
Change in nausea (0 to 10 numerical scale)
Up to 10 days
Change in delirium (16 item clinician rated scale)
Up to 10 days
Rousability (10 point scale)
Up to 10 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Time to enroll 20 subjects
One year
Cost determination for developing a budget for a large multi-center trial
One year
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALDexmedetomidine 0.2 to 1.1 mcg/kg/hr by continuous subcutaneous infusion for up to 10 days
Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidazolam 10 to 100 mcg/kg/hr by continuous subcutaneous infusion for up to 10 days
Interventions
Study drugs will be administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion using a weight based protocol at a rate between 1.0 to 5.5 mL/hr. * The study drug will be started at a rate of 1.0 mL/hr. * The infusion rate is incremented by 0.5 ml/hr every 30 minutes until acceptable symptom control, bradycardia (heart rate \< 40) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 80) prevent further increase or maximum infusion rate of 5.5 ml/hr, whichever comes first. Achievement of acceptable symptom control will be defined, for purposes of this trial, as a consensus between reports from patient, family care giver and attending registered nurse
Study drugs will be administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion using a weight based protocol at a rate between 1.0 to 5.5 mL/hr. * The study drug will be started at a rate of 1.0 mL/hr. * The infusion rate is incremented by 0.5 ml/hr every 30 minutes until acceptable symptom control, bradycardia (heart rate \< 40) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 80) prevent further increase or maximum infusion rate of 5.5 ml/hr, whichever comes first. Achievement of acceptable symptom control will be defined, for purposes of this trial, as a consensus between reports from patient, family care giver and attending registered nurse
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater or equal to 19 years of age
- Advanced cancer patient admitted to the Abbotsford Tertiary Palliative Care Unit
- Difficult to control or intractable symptom (REF 38, page 3)
- Midazolam CSCI would normally be considered for symptom management
- Informed consent is able to be provided in the English language
- Goals of care include do not resuscitate (DNR)
- For intractable symptoms, patient would prefer proportional sedation rather than no sedation or total sedation.
You may not qualify if:
- Second or third degree heart block (without pacemaker)
- Uncompensated congestive heart failure
- Heart rate less than 50 beats per minute
- Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) \< 60
- Weight below 35 kg. or above 85 kg.
- Prior use within the preceding 14 days of high dose benzodiazepines equivalent to the use of 30 mg or more of midazolam or 6 mg or more of lorazepam per 24 hours.
- Currently enrolled in any other research study involving drugs or devices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fraser Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Center
Abbotsford, British Columbia, V2S 0C2, Canada
Related Publications (40)
Abernethy AP. Pain and palliative care pharmacotherapy literature summaries and analyses. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(2):145-51. doi: 10.1080/15360280801992140.
PMID: 19042839BACKGROUNDAnger KE, Szumita PM, Baroletti SA, Labreche MJ, Fanikos J. Evaluation of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-based sedation therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients at a tertiary academic medical center. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Dec;9(4):221-6. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181f4ec4a.
PMID: 21119342BACKGROUNDArain SR, Ruehlow RM, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. The efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):153-158. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093225.39866.75.
PMID: 14693611BACKGROUNDBrinkkemper T, van Norel AM, Szadek KM, Loer SA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. The use of observational scales to monitor symptom control and depth of sedation in patients requiring palliative sedation: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;27(1):54-67. doi: 10.1177/0269216311425421. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
PMID: 22045725BACKGROUNDCaraceni A, Simonetti F. Palliating delirium in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Feb;10(2):164-72. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70018-X.
PMID: 19185834BACKGROUNDChang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M. Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer. 2000 May 1;88(9):2164-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000501)88:93.0.co;2-5.
PMID: 10813730BACKGROUNDCheung CW, Ying CL, Chiu WK, Wong GT, Ng KF, Irwin MG. A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery. Anaesthesia. 2007 Nov;62(11):1132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05230.x.
PMID: 17924894BACKGROUNDChrysostomou C, Schmitt CG. Dexmedetomidine: sedation, analgesia and beyond. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2008 May;4(5):619-27. doi: 10.1517/17425255.4.5.619.
PMID: 18484919BACKGROUNDClark, S., & Ezra, M. Use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic agent in critically ill adult patients. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 12(3), 244-245, 2011.
BACKGROUNDCoull JT, Jones ME, Egan TD, Frith CD, Maze M. Attentional effects of noradrenaline vary with arousal level: selective activation of thalamic pulvinar in humans. Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):315-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.022.
PMID: 15110021BACKGROUNDCoyne PJ, Wozencraft CP, Roberts SB, Bobb B, Smith TJ. Dexmedetomidine: exploring its potential role and dosing guideline for its use in intractable pain in the palliative care setting. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;24(4):384-6. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.518227.
PMID: 21133747BACKGROUNDDere K, Sucullu I, Budak ET, Yeyen S, Filiz AI, Ozkan S, Dagli G. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):648-52. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283347bfe.
PMID: 20531094BACKGROUNDEly EW, Truman B, Shintani A, Thomason JW, Wheeler AP, Gordon S, Francis J, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Sessler CN, Dittus RS, Bernard GR. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2983-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983.
PMID: 12799407BACKGROUNDGerlach AT, Murphy CV, Dasta JF. An updated focused review of dexmedetomidine in adults. Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Dec;43(12):2064-74. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M310.
PMID: 19934395BACKGROUNDGuinter JR, Kristeller JL. Prolonged infusions of dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Aug;67(15):1246-53. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090300.
PMID: 20651314BACKGROUNDJackson KC 3rd, Wohlt P, Fine PG. Dexmedetomidine: a novel analgesic with palliative medicine potential. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20(2):23-7.
PMID: 16702133BACKGROUNDJones GM, Murphy CV, Gerlach AT, Goodman EM, Pell LJ. High-dose dexmedetomidine for sedation in the intensive care unit: an evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety. Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Jun;45(6):740-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P726. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
PMID: 21666095BACKGROUNDKehl KA. Treatment of terminal restlessness: a review of the evidence. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2004;18(1):5-30.
PMID: 15148006BACKGROUNDKent CD, Kaufman BS, Lowy J. Dexmedetomidine facilitates the withdrawal of ventilatory support in palliative care. Anesthesiology. 2005 Aug;103(2):439-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00028. No abstract available.
PMID: 16052127BACKGROUNDKunisawa T. Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride as a long-term sedative. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2011;7:291-9. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S14581. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
PMID: 21845052BACKGROUNDLum, K. L., & Sanders, H. G. A comparison of midazolam and flunitrazepam in end-of-life care. Progress in Palliative Care, 19(1), 1-6, 2011.
BACKGROUNDMaldonado JR, Wysong A, van der Starre PJ, Block T, Miller C, Reitz BA. Dexmedetomidine and the reduction of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. Psychosomatics. 2009 May-Jun;50(3):206-17. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.3.206.
PMID: 19567759BACKGROUNDMaze M, Angst MS. Dexmedetomidine and opioid interactions: defining the role of dexmedetomidine for intensive care unit sedation. Anesthesiology. 2004 Nov;101(5):1059-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00002. No abstract available.
PMID: 15505438BACKGROUNDMercadante S, Intravaia G, Villari P, Ferrera P, David F, Casuccio A. Controlled sedation for refractory symptoms in dying patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 May;37(5):771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.04.020. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
PMID: 19041216BACKGROUNDMuttu S, Liu EH, Ang SB, Chew PT, Lee TL, Ti LK. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam sedation for cataract surgery under topical anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Sep;31(9):1845-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.09.019. No abstract available.
PMID: 16246802BACKGROUNDPrommer E. Review article: dexmedetomidine: does it have potential in palliative medicine? Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Jun;28(4):276-83. doi: 10.1177/1049909110389804. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
PMID: 21131636BACKGROUNDRiker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, Ceraso D, Wisemandle W, Koura F, Whitten P, Margolis BD, Byrne DW, Ely EW, Rocha MG; SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
PMID: 19188334BACKGROUNDRoberts SB, Wozencraft CP, Coyne PJ, Smith TJ. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant analgesic for intractable cancer pain. J Palliat Med. 2011 Mar;14(3):371-3. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0235. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
PMID: 21241196BACKGROUNDRuokonen E, Parviainen I, Jakob SM, Nunes S, Kaukonen M, Shepherd ST, Sarapohja T, Bratty JR, Takala J; "Dexmedetomidine for Continuous Sedation" Investigators. Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Feb;35(2):282-90. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1296-0. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
PMID: 18795253BACKGROUNDShehabi, Y., Botha, J. A., Ernest, D., Freebairn, R. C., Reade, M., Roberts, B. L., et al. Clinical application, the use of dexmedetomidine in intensive care sedation. Critical Care and Shock, 13(2), 40-50, 2010.
BACKGROUNDSoares LG, Naylor C, Martins MA, Peixoto G. Dexmedetomidine: a new option for intractable distress in the dying. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Jul;24(1):6-8. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00423-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 12183087BACKGROUNDTan JA, Ho KM. Use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic agent in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):926-39. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1877-6. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
PMID: 20376429BACKGROUNDTobias JD. Subcutaneous dexmedetomidine infusions to treat or prevent drug withdrawal in infants and children. J Opioid Manag. 2008 Jul-Aug;4(4):187-91. doi: 10.5055/jom.2008.0024.
PMID: 18837201BACKGROUNDTrzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N. Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Spring;13(2):229-42. doi: 10.1176/jnp.13.2.229.
PMID: 11449030BACKGROUNDUstun Y, Gunduz M, Erdogan O, Benlidayi ME. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;64(9):1353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.020.
PMID: 16916668BACKGROUNDWallace S, Mecklenburg B, Hanling S. Profound reduction in sedation and analgesic requirements using extended dexmedetomidine infusions in a patient with an open abdomen. Mil Med. 2009 Nov;174(11):1228-30. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-00-6009.
PMID: 19960834BACKGROUNDFraser Health Authority (FHA) Hospice Palliative Care Program Symptom Guideline "Refractory Symptoms and Palliative Sedation Therapy Guideline", May 9, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.fraserhealth.ca/media/RefractorySymptomsandPalliativeSedationTherapyRevised_Sept%2009.pdf )
BACKGROUNDFlanagan E, Gentry J. He's taking how much Dilaudid! Dexmedetomidine: a novel approach to refractory symptom management. Presentation of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine & Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Conference 2011 Feb 16-19; Vancouver, British Columbia
BACKGROUNDDoyle, D. et al, Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine, Third Edition 2004, p. 219.
BACKGROUNDStorey P, Knight C. Assessment and Treatment of Pain in the Terminally Ill. UNIPAC Three, Hospice/Palliative Care Training for Physicians, A Self-Study Program, American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Second Edition, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2003, p. 62.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neil K Hilliard, MD
1. BC Cancer Agency 2. Fraser Health Authority
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stuart Brown, MD
Fraser Health Authority
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2012
First Posted
September 19, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 25, 2015
Record last verified: 2013-01