Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) for Recurrent Pediatric Brain Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this proposal is to evaluate a new Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) modification which could revolutionize the treatment of brain tumors in children and adults. There are currently few cases published involving the use of PDT in infratentorial (in the posterior fossa) brain tumors in general and specifically those occurring in children. The investigators propose to test a technique, for the first time in the U.S., that demonstrated in Australian adult glioblastoma patients dramatic long-term, survival rates of 57% (anaplastic astrocytoma) and 37% (glioblastoma multiforme). These results are unprecedented in any other treatment protocol. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a paradigm shift in the treatment of tumors from the traditional resection and systemic chemotherapy methods. The principle behind photodynamic therapy is light-mediated activation of a photosensitizer that is selectively accumulated in the target tissue, causing tumor cell destruction through singlet oxygen production. Therefore, the photosensitizer is considered to be the first critical element in PDT procedures, and the activation procedure is the second step. The methodology used in this proposal utilizes more intensive laser light and larger Photofrin photosensitizer doses than prior PDT protocols in the U.S. for brain tumor patients. The PDT will consist of photoillumination at 630 nm beginning at the center of the tumor resection cavity, and delivering a total energy of 240 J cm-2. The investigators feel that the light should penetrate far enough into the tissue to reach migrating tumor cells, and destroy these cells without harming the healthy cells in which they are dispersed. The investigators will be testing the hypothesis that pediatric subjects with progressive/recurrent malignant brain tumors undergoing PDT with increased doses of Photofrin® and light energy than were used in our previous clinical study will show better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. PDT will also be effective against infratentorial tumors. The specific aims include determining the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of Photofrin in children and looking for preliminary effectiveness trends.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Mar 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 29, 2018
CompletedFebruary 25, 2019
February 1, 2019
5.3 years
September 5, 2012
February 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of Photofrin® in pediatric subjects
MTD is defined as the Photofrin® dose that precedes the dose level used with a subgroup of subjects that exhibits a greater than 33% DLT occurrence. DLT is defined as any of the following events with reasonable possibility to be attributable to the experimental intervention: 1. Neurotoxicity: defined as a decline in neurological function manifest within 1 week of PDT and persistent to 4 weeks post-PDT. Adverse events of neurologic function of grade 4, or a level change from grade 1 to grade 3, within this period will constitute neurotoxicity for this study. The CTCAE V4.02 will be used. 2. Photosensitivity: defined as a photosensitivity adverse event (CTCAE category dermatology/skin) of grade 4 occurring within the same period. 3. Ocular sensitivity: Photofrin®-induced ocular sensitivity is defined as a photophobia adverse event (CTCAE category ocular/visual) of grade 4 within the same period. 4. Any other toxicity of CTCAE grade 4 or higher within the same period.
One to four weeks from PDT
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Brain tumor response
Response ocurring within 3 years after PDT
Study Arms (1)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALPhotofrin (porfimer sodium) photodynamic therapy.
Interventions
Intravenous (IV) Photofrin This is a dose escalation study. Patients will receive Photofrin via an IV infusion approximately 24 hours prior to their tumor resection surgery and Photodynamic Therapy (PDT). Patients will be light sensitive immediately upon receiving the Photofrin and must observe photosensitivity \& light precautions for a minimum of 30 days after the infusion. Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) After tumor resection, an optical fiber will be placed in the approximate center of the surgical cavity. Intralipid will be infused into the open tumor cavity while PDT is performed. The Intralipid will diffuse the light and ensure uniform delivery. Photoactivation of Photofrin is controlled by the total light dose delivered over the treatment time.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Disseminated disease (metastatic disease)
- Pregnancy or Breast-Feeding: Pregnant or breast-feeding women will not be entered on this study, as risks of fetal and teratogenic adverse effects of Photofrin® are not known.
- Other concurrent tumor therapy
- Subjects with porphyria
- Subjects taking potentially photosensitizing drugs
- The presence of adverse events of neurologic function, photosensitivity, or photophobia Grade 4 or higher (CTCAE Version 4.0)
- Allergy to eggs, soybean oil, or safflower oil (due to potential allergy against intralipids)
- Patients who in the opinion of the investigator may not be able to comply with the safety monitoring requirements of the study are not eligible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Harry T Whelan, MDlead
- Pinnacle Biologics Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harry T Whelan, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeff Knipstein, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Bleser Professor of Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2012
First Posted
September 11, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 29, 2018
Study Completion
June 29, 2018
Last Updated
February 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02