Investigation of Synbiotic Treatment in NAFLD
INSYTE
Investigation of the Effects of a Synbiotic on Liver Fat, Disease Biomarkers and Intestinal Microbiota in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a liver condition in which fat builds up in the liver not caused by alcohol. The liver is an organ that is not designed to build up fat. NAFLD is common in people who have too much body fat in their abdomen or who have diabetes (high blood sugar), but does not always exist with these conditions. NAFLD can also occur in thin people too. NAFLD can be harmful to the liver and may cause the liver to fail over time. NAFLD may also cause adult (or type 2) diabetes and also heart disease. In people who already have diabetes, NAFLD can cause glucose (sugar) levels to be too high. Our intestines (guts) contain healthy bacteria and some harmful bacteria (bugs). This balance of healthy and harmful bugs is essential for the normal workings of our intestine to digest food. Providing these bacteria do not leak out into the blood they do not cause harm. If the balance of healthy to harmful bugs is upset, the harmful can cause problems and leak out into the blood. Because the liver is connected to the intestine by blood vessels the harmful bacteria can get to the liver and cause problems. These bacteria can cause the liver and the body to build up too much fat and might cause NAFLD and obesity. In this study, we will test the effects of a supplement (synbiotic) taken during the day, that contains a mixture of 'good' healthy bacteria (probiotic) and a sugar (prebiotic) that is not broken down and absorbed into the blood. We will test whether the synbiotic supplement has beneficial effects on the NAFLD liver condition and on factors linked to too much body fat, diabetes and heart disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 5, 2021
CompletedFebruary 5, 2021
October 1, 2020
5.1 years
August 24, 2012
May 27, 2020
January 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Liver Fat
Change in liver fat percent was calculated as the percent liver fat at the end of the study, minus the percent of liver fat prior to the intervention. Change in liver fat percent ranged from -60.6% (good) to + 33.7% (bad).
baseline and 12 months
Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score (ELF)
Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score (ELF) was calculated as ELF score at the end of the study minus ELF score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the ELF score was considered good as it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in ELF score was considered bad as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in ELF scores ranged from -0.56 (good) to + 0.68 (bad).
baseline and 12 months
Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score
Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) was calculated as the NFS score at the end of the study, minus NFS score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the NFS score was considered good because it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in NFS score was considered bad, as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in NFS scores ranged from -2.07 (good) to + 1.75 (bad)
baseline and 12 months
Change in Bifidobacterium Spp.
The change in percent of Bifidobacteria spp was computed as the percent of Bifidobactera spp at the end of the study minus the percent of Bifidobacteria prior to the intervention (at baseline). A positive change in percent (e.g +0.1 to 7.0%) in Bifidobacteria spp. was considered good and a negative change in percent (e.g. -0.1 to -0.5%) in Bifidobacteria spp. considered bad. (Minimum = -0.5% (bad) and Maximum = +7.0% (good)).
baseline and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Synbiotic
ACTIVE COMPARATORFructo-oligosacharide with a degree of polymerization \< 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (BB-12) as minimum of 10 billion colony forming unit (CFU)/day (1 capsule a day).
Maltodextrin
PLACEBO COMPARATOR4 grams of maltodextrin daily.
Interventions
The synbiotic to be used is fructo-oligosacharide with a degree of polymerization \< 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both men and women
- Age \> 18 years
- Alcohol consumption ≤ 14 units / week for women ≤ 21 units / week for men.
You may not qualify if:
- Alcohol consumption \> 15 units /week for women and \> 22 units /week for men.
- Decompensated acute or chronic liver disease.
- A history of viral hepatitis, diarrhoea, diverticulosis, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel diseases, coeliac disease (seropositivity for anti-endomysial immunoglobulin A antibodies; immunoglobulin A (IgA) EMA).
- Previous bariatric or other abdominal surgery.
- Continuous use of antibiotics that may change gut microflora, probiotics, or antisecretory drugs capable of causing achlorhydria within the 2 months preceding enrolment, or evidence of immunoglobulin A or immunoglobulin deficiency (both of which produce confounding effects during assessments of intestinal permeability and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Southamption General Hospital
Southampton, Hants, SO166YD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Scorletti E, Afolabi PR, Miles EA, Smith DE, Almehmadi A, Alshathry A, Childs CE, Del Fabbro S, Bilson J, Moyses HE, Clough GF, Sethi JK, Patel J, Wright M, Breen DJ, Peebles C, Darekar A, Aspinall R, Fowell AJ, Dowman JK, Nobili V, Targher G, Delzenne NM, Bindels LB, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Synbiotics Alter Fecal Microbiomes, But Not Liver Fat or Fibrosis, in a Randomized Trial of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1597-1610.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
PMID: 31987796DERIVEDScorletti E, Afolabi PR, Miles EA, Smith DE, Almehmadi A, Alshathry A, Moyses HE, Clough GF, Wright M, Patel J, Bindels L, Delzenne NM, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Design and rationale of the INSYTE study: A randomised, placebo controlled study to test the efficacy of a synbiotic on liver fat, disease biomarkers and intestinal microbiota in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 19.
PMID: 29787859DERIVEDByrne CD, Targher G. Time to Replace Assessment of Liver Histology With MR-Based Imaging Tests to Assess Efficacy of Interventions for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):7-10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Nov 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 26602219DERIVEDByrne CD, Targher G. Ectopic fat, insulin resistance, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: implications for cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Jun;34(6):1155-61. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303034. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
PMID: 24743428DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
We choose one strain of bacteria in the synbiotic. The study was designed as a phase-2 clinical trial using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and not liver biopsy. We deliberately did not include a lifestyle intervention as we wanted to test the effect of the synbiotic alone.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Christopher D Byrne
- Organization
- University of Southampton
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher D Byrne, MBBCh, PhD
University of Southampton/University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2012
First Posted
September 7, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 5, 2021
Results First Posted
February 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-10