Pinless-Navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
Radiographic Analysis Comparing Pinless-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The success of total knee arthroplasty depends on a number of factors including pre-operative range of movement, obesity, medical comorbidities, prosthesis design, preparation and implantation of the prosthesis, soft tissue balancing, as well as implants alignment. Optimal placement of the implants within 3° of the mechanical axis of the lower limb has been proven to reduce wear and early implant failure. Compared to conventional techniques, computer-Aided Navigation total knee arthroplasty has been widely used in the last decade and have been proven to improve the accuracy of prosthesis placement and lower limb alignment by reducing the number of outliers with more than 3° deviation from the mechanical axis. However, its use also involves a steep learning curve, high initial capital cost and longer duration of surgery. Traditional computer-navigated TKA using optical tracking systems also requires fixation of the femoral and tibial reference arrays to bone using anchoring pins. Complications reported with the use of these pins include either femoral or tibial fracture, pin site pain, pin site infection and osteomyelitis. The investigators study aims to investigate the accuracy of a new pinless navigation system for TKA that will avoid these complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedApril 18, 2018
April 1, 2018
11 months
August 3, 2012
April 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic analysis
The number of outliers and mean value of: 1) Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA), the angle formed by the mechanical axis of the femur (line between the centre of the femoral head and the centre of the knee) and the mechanical axis of the tibia (line between the centre of the talus and the centre of the knee); 2) Coronal Femoral-Component Angle (CFA), the angle formed by the femoral component and the mechanical axis of the femur; 3) Coronal Tibia-Component Angle (CTA), the angle formed by the tibia base plate and the mechanical axis of the tibia.
Up till 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Duration of surgery
Up till 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Pinless-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients underwent total knee arthroplasty using a Pinless-Navigated system that is designed to restore the mechanical alignment of the lower limb.
Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients underwent total knee arthroplasty using conventional technique.
Interventions
Brainlab VectorVision Knee 2.5 Navigation System
Conventional technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients between the ages of 45 and 90 diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee and scheduled for unilateral total knee replacement.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients coming for revision total knee arthroplasty
- Patients diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608, Singapore
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pak Lin Chin, FRCS
Singapore General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2012
First Posted
August 30, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04