Study Stopped
Halted by the Management Committee after the publication of the ART Trial
Open Lung Ventilation in ARDS: The PHARLAP Trial
PHARLAP
A Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of an Open Lung Strategy Including Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
1 other identifier
interventional
115
5 countries
27
Brief Summary
Some people develop the condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This is a condition where the lungs have become injured from one of a number of various causes, and do not work as they normally do to provide oxygen and remove carbon dioxide from the body. This can lead to a reduced amount of oxygen in the patient's bloodstream. Patients with ARDS are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and need help with their breathing by being connected to a ventilator (breathing machine). ARDS can lead to injury in other organs of the body causing other problems but also death. Over the past few years, reducing the size of each breath delivered by the ventilator in conjunction with the use of an occasional sustained deep breath called a "recruitment manoeuvre" have been used to try to prevent further damage to the lungs in people with ARDS. This ventilator strategy (termed the PHARLAP strategy) has been shown in a small research study to have some beneficial effects without causing any obvious harm, when compared to a current best practice ventilator strategy. The main beneficial effects of the PHARLAP strategy were to increase the amount of oxygen in the blood and to reduce markers of inflammation (the body reacting to a disease process) in the body. This study was too small to make a strong conclusion, so this study will be much larger and will assess whether patients who have developed ARDS are better off when we use the PHARLAP strategy. Three hundred and forty patients will be enrolled into this study in multiple ICUs across Australia and New Zealand. The study hypothesis is that the PHARLAP strategy group will have a higher number of ventilator free days at day 28 than the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
27 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 18, 2024
CompletedJuly 18, 2024
February 1, 2024
5 years
August 12, 2012
April 10, 2022
February 4, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Ventilator Free Days at Day 28 Post Randomisation
This is the total number of days calculated from day 1 (randomisation) to day 28 on which the patient was alive and received no assistance from invasive mechanical ventilation. Scores range between 0 (no ventilator free days) to 28 (no days on ventilator).
28 days post randomisation
Secondary Outcomes (11)
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio and Static Lung Compliance
Up to day 28 post randomisation
Baseline to Day 3 Change in IL-8 and IL-6 Concentrations in Broncho-alveolar Lavage and Plasma
Day 3 post randomisation
Number of Severe Hypotension Events
Up to 28 days post randomisation
Number of Participants With Barotrauma
Up to 90 days post randomisation
Use of Rescue Therapies for Severe Hypoxaemia - Inhaled Nitric Oxide, Inhaled Prostacyclin, Prone Positioning, High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
Within hospital admission
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PHARLAP ventilation group
EXPERIMENTALPHARLAP mechanical ventilation strategy
Control group ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group mechanical ventilation strategy
Interventions
Pressure control ventilation to maintain tidal volume 4-6 ml/kg and plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O while tolerating respiratory acidosis if pH \> 7.15; daily staircase recruitment manoeuvre and individualised PEEP titration.
Mechanical ventilation based on the ARDSnet protocol using volume control ventilation with tidal volume 6 ml/kg, plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O and FiO2/PEEP titration according to a FiO2/PEEP/oxygen saturation combination chart. This has been modified for Australian and New Zealand practice to allow pressure control and pressure support ventilation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult ICU patients who met all of the following criteria:
- Currently intubated and receiving mechanical ventilation
- Within 72 Hours of a diagnosis of ARDS (moderate and severe) based on the following Berlin definition:
- Within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms
- Bilateral opacities on chest x-ray (CXR) which are not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse or nodules
- Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
- Arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2)/FiO2 \< 200mmHg with PEEP ≥ 5cmH2O
You may not qualify if:
- \> 72 hours since diagnosis of ARDS
- \> 10 days of continuous mechanical ventilation
- Barotrauma (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema or any intercostal catheter for the treatment of air leak)
- Significant chest trauma i.e. multiple rib fractures
- Active bronchospasm or a history of significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma
- Clinical suspicion for significant restrictive lung disease (history of pulmonary fibrosis or suggestive pulmonary function tests)
- Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, the presence of an intracranial pressure monitor, or any medical condition associated with a clinical suspicion of raised intracranial pressure
- Unstable cardiovascular status defined as sustained heart rate \< 40 or \> 140 bpm, ventricular tachycardia, or SBP \< 80mmHg
- Pregnancy
- Receiving ECMO
- Receiving high frequency oscillatory ventilation
- Death is deemed imminent and inevitable
- The treating physician believes it is not in the best interest of the patient to be enrolled in the trial
- Consent not obtained or refused by patient's legal surrogate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (27)
Albury/Wodonga
Albury, New South Wales, Australia
Nepean Hospital
Kingswood, New South Wales, 2747, Australia
Royal Prince Alfred
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500, Australia
The Prince Charles Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Flinders Medical Centre
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Geelong Hospital
Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
The Alfred Hosptial
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
Adelaide and Meath (Tallaght) Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
Beaumont Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
St Vincents Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
University Hospital Limerick
Limerick, Ireland
Middlemore Hospital
Otahuhu, Auckland, 1640, New Zealand
Auckland City Hospital (DCCM)
Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
Auckland City Hospital CVICU
Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
King Abdulaziz Medical City
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Peterborough City Hospital
Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
Princess Royal University Hospital
Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
Southmead Hospital
Bristol, United Kingdom
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London, United Kingdom
North Middlesex University Hospital
London, United Kingdom
University Hospital, Lewisham
London, United Kingdom
James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Hodgson CL, Cooper DJ, Arabi Y, King V, Bersten A, Bihari S, Brickell K, Davies A, Fahey C, Fraser J, McGuinness S, Murray L, Parke R, Paul E, Tuxen D, Vallance S, Young M, Nichol A. Maximal Recruitment Open Lung Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PHARLAP). A Phase II, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec 1;200(11):1363-1372. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201901-0109OC.
PMID: 31356105BACKGROUNDHodgson C, Cooper DJ, Arabi Y, Bennett V, Bersten A, Brickell K, Davies A, Fahey C, Fraser J, McGuinness S, Murray L, Parke R, Tuxen D, Vallance S, Young M, Nichol AD; PHARLAP Study Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure (PHARLAP): a protocol for a phase 2 trial in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Jun;20(2):139-149.
PMID: 29852853BACKGROUNDBihari S, Bersten A, Paul E, McGuinness S, Dixon D, Sinha P, Calfee CS, Nichol A, Hodgson C; PHARLAP Study Investigators. Acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes with distinct clinical outcomes in PHARLAP trial cohort. Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(2):163-170. doi: 10.51893/2021.2.oa3. eCollection 2021 Jun.
PMID: 38045528BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The power of the study was limited by lower than expected recruitment rates, early termination of the trial (due to the publication of the ART trial), and treatment crossovers. Blinding was not possible within the ICU, staff and relatives were aware of group allocation.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof Carol Hodgson
- Organization
- ANZIC - RC, Monash University
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Carol Hodgson, PhD, FACP, BAppSc
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC)
- STUDY CHAIR
Alistair Nichol, PhD, FCICM
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Carol Hodgson
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2012
First Posted
August 17, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 18, 2024
Results First Posted
July 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Is available on request
- Access Criteria
- request made to custodian via Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre See ANZIC-RC website term of reference document
The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC RC), Monash University supports the view that: * Publicly funded research data should be made available with as few restrictions as possible * Data sharing could enhance public well-being by maximising utilisation of gained knowledge, reducing redundant research and facilitating scientific innovation, * Data sharing must be responsible, recognise legal, regulatory, ethical and commercial constraints. The ANZIC-RC has formulated a policy and process to allow appropriate and responsible sharing of research data including prospective and completed studies. This Policy was guided by, Institute of Medicine principles for responsible sharing of clinical trial data: * Maximise the benefits of clinical trials * Minimising the risks of data sharing * Respect individual participants * Increase public trust in clinical trials * Conduct the sharing of trial data in a fair manner * Appropriately manage conflicts of interest.