NCT01667146

Brief Summary

Some people develop the condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This is a condition where the lungs have become injured from one of a number of various causes, and do not work as they normally do to provide oxygen and remove carbon dioxide from the body. This can lead to a reduced amount of oxygen in the patient's bloodstream. Patients with ARDS are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and need help with their breathing by being connected to a ventilator (breathing machine). ARDS can lead to injury in other organs of the body causing other problems but also death. Over the past few years, reducing the size of each breath delivered by the ventilator in conjunction with the use of an occasional sustained deep breath called a "recruitment manoeuvre" have been used to try to prevent further damage to the lungs in people with ARDS. This ventilator strategy (termed the PHARLAP strategy) has been shown in a small research study to have some beneficial effects without causing any obvious harm, when compared to a current best practice ventilator strategy. The main beneficial effects of the PHARLAP strategy were to increase the amount of oxygen in the blood and to reduce markers of inflammation (the body reacting to a disease process) in the body. This study was too small to make a strong conclusion, so this study will be much larger and will assess whether patients who have developed ARDS are better off when we use the PHARLAP strategy. Three hundred and forty patients will be enrolled into this study in multiple ICUs across Australia and New Zealand. The study hypothesis is that the PHARLAP strategy group will have a higher number of ventilator free days at day 28 than the control group.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
115

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
5 countries

27 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 12, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 17, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2018

Completed
6.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 18, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 18, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

August 12, 2012

Results QC Date

April 10, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Ventilator Free Days at Day 28 Post Randomisation

    This is the total number of days calculated from day 1 (randomisation) to day 28 on which the patient was alive and received no assistance from invasive mechanical ventilation. Scores range between 0 (no ventilator free days) to 28 (no days on ventilator).

    28 days post randomisation

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • PaO2/FiO2 Ratio and Static Lung Compliance

    Up to day 28 post randomisation

  • Baseline to Day 3 Change in IL-8 and IL-6 Concentrations in Broncho-alveolar Lavage and Plasma

    Day 3 post randomisation

  • Number of Severe Hypotension Events

    Up to 28 days post randomisation

  • Number of Participants With Barotrauma

    Up to 90 days post randomisation

  • Use of Rescue Therapies for Severe Hypoxaemia - Inhaled Nitric Oxide, Inhaled Prostacyclin, Prone Positioning, High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

    Within hospital admission

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PHARLAP ventilation group

EXPERIMENTAL

PHARLAP mechanical ventilation strategy

Other: PHARLAP mechanical ventilation strategy

Control group ventilation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group mechanical ventilation strategy

Other: Control group mechanical ventilation strategy

Interventions

Pressure control ventilation to maintain tidal volume 4-6 ml/kg and plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O while tolerating respiratory acidosis if pH \> 7.15; daily staircase recruitment manoeuvre and individualised PEEP titration.

PHARLAP ventilation group

Mechanical ventilation based on the ARDSnet protocol using volume control ventilation with tidal volume 6 ml/kg, plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O and FiO2/PEEP titration according to a FiO2/PEEP/oxygen saturation combination chart. This has been modified for Australian and New Zealand practice to allow pressure control and pressure support ventilation.

Control group ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult ICU patients who met all of the following criteria:
  • Currently intubated and receiving mechanical ventilation
  • Within 72 Hours of a diagnosis of ARDS (moderate and severe) based on the following Berlin definition:
  • Within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms
  • Bilateral opacities on chest x-ray (CXR) which are not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse or nodules
  • Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
  • Arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2)/FiO2 \< 200mmHg with PEEP ≥ 5cmH2O

You may not qualify if:

  • \> 72 hours since diagnosis of ARDS
  • \> 10 days of continuous mechanical ventilation
  • Barotrauma (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema or any intercostal catheter for the treatment of air leak)
  • Significant chest trauma i.e. multiple rib fractures
  • Active bronchospasm or a history of significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma
  • Clinical suspicion for significant restrictive lung disease (history of pulmonary fibrosis or suggestive pulmonary function tests)
  • Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, the presence of an intracranial pressure monitor, or any medical condition associated with a clinical suspicion of raised intracranial pressure
  • Unstable cardiovascular status defined as sustained heart rate \< 40 or \> 140 bpm, ventricular tachycardia, or SBP \< 80mmHg
  • Pregnancy
  • Receiving ECMO
  • Receiving high frequency oscillatory ventilation
  • Death is deemed imminent and inevitable
  • The treating physician believes it is not in the best interest of the patient to be enrolled in the trial
  • Consent not obtained or refused by patient's legal surrogate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (27)

Albury/Wodonga

Albury, New South Wales, Australia

Location

Nepean Hospital

Kingswood, New South Wales, 2747, Australia

Location

Royal Prince Alfred

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Location

Wollongong Hospital

Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500, Australia

Location

The Prince Charles Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Location

Flinders Medical Centre

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Location

Geelong Hospital

Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia

Location

The Alfred Hosptial

Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia

Location

Adelaide and Meath (Tallaght) Hospital

Dublin, Ireland

Location

Beaumont Hospital

Dublin, Ireland

Location

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

Dublin, Ireland

Location

St Vincents Hospital

Dublin, Ireland

Location

University Hospital Limerick

Limerick, Ireland

Location

Middlemore Hospital

Otahuhu, Auckland, 1640, New Zealand

Location

Auckland City Hospital (DCCM)

Auckland, 1142, New Zealand

Location

Auckland City Hospital CVICU

Auckland, 1142, New Zealand

Location

King Abdulaziz Medical City

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Location

Peterborough City Hospital

Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom

Location

Derriford Hospital

Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom

Location

Princess Royal University Hospital

Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Surrey County Hospital

Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom

Location

Southmead Hospital

Bristol, United Kingdom

Location

Hull Royal Infirmary

Hull, United Kingdom

Location

King's College Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

North Middlesex University Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

University Hospital, Lewisham

London, United Kingdom

Location

James Cook University Hospital

Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Hodgson CL, Cooper DJ, Arabi Y, King V, Bersten A, Bihari S, Brickell K, Davies A, Fahey C, Fraser J, McGuinness S, Murray L, Parke R, Paul E, Tuxen D, Vallance S, Young M, Nichol A. Maximal Recruitment Open Lung Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PHARLAP). A Phase II, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec 1;200(11):1363-1372. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201901-0109OC.

    PMID: 31356105BACKGROUND
  • Hodgson C, Cooper DJ, Arabi Y, Bennett V, Bersten A, Brickell K, Davies A, Fahey C, Fraser J, McGuinness S, Murray L, Parke R, Tuxen D, Vallance S, Young M, Nichol AD; PHARLAP Study Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure (PHARLAP): a protocol for a phase 2 trial in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Jun;20(2):139-149.

    PMID: 29852853BACKGROUND
  • Bihari S, Bersten A, Paul E, McGuinness S, Dixon D, Sinha P, Calfee CS, Nichol A, Hodgson C; PHARLAP Study Investigators. Acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes with distinct clinical outcomes in PHARLAP trial cohort. Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(2):163-170. doi: 10.51893/2021.2.oa3. eCollection 2021 Jun.

    PMID: 38045528BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Limitations and Caveats

The power of the study was limited by lower than expected recruitment rates, early termination of the trial (due to the publication of the ART trial), and treatment crossovers. Blinding was not possible within the ICU, staff and relatives were aware of group allocation.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof Carol Hodgson
Organization
ANZIC - RC, Monash University

Study Officials

  • Carol Hodgson, PhD, FACP, BAppSc

    Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC)

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Alistair Nichol, PhD, FCICM

    Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC)

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr Carol Hodgson

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2012

First Posted

August 17, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

October 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 1, 2018

Last Updated

July 18, 2024

Results First Posted

July 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC RC), Monash University supports the view that: * Publicly funded research data should be made available with as few restrictions as possible * Data sharing could enhance public well-being by maximising utilisation of gained knowledge, reducing redundant research and facilitating scientific innovation, * Data sharing must be responsible, recognise legal, regulatory, ethical and commercial constraints. The ANZIC-RC has formulated a policy and process to allow appropriate and responsible sharing of research data including prospective and completed studies. This Policy was guided by, Institute of Medicine principles for responsible sharing of clinical trial data: * Maximise the benefits of clinical trials * Minimising the risks of data sharing * Respect individual participants * Increase public trust in clinical trials * Conduct the sharing of trial data in a fair manner * Appropriately manage conflicts of interest.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Is available on request
Access Criteria
request made to custodian via Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre See ANZIC-RC website term of reference document
More information

Locations