Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Peri-Articular Injection Versus Epidural Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA)
PAI Hip
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The best way to provide analgesia after total hip arthroplasty is hotly debated. There are two protocols in use at Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS). Both protocols have their proponents, but there are limited data for making an informed choice of protocols. For total hip arthroplasty at HSS, epidural analgesia is used most frequently as it reduces pain with physical therapy. However, epidural analgesia can be associated with nausea, pruritis, dizziness, and orthostatic hypotension. These side-effects can slow physical therapy and may prolong the time until the patient is ready for discharge. Some surgeons at HSS have decided to use a different analgesic protocol, based on a peri-articular injection. This protocol avoids epidural analgesia and systemic opioids. However, patients are given oral opioids as part of a multimodal pain therapy. The investigators propose to compare peri-articular injection to epidural patient controlled analgesia (Epidural PCA). The investigators will enroll 90 total patients (45 per study arm). The enrollment period will be approximately one year and the duration of the follow-up with study patients will be three months following their procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 10, 2016
CompletedApril 14, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.2 years
March 1, 2012
April 4, 2016
April 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time Until Patient is Ready for Discharge
"readiness for discharge" to home or to a rehabilitation facility (compared to the HSS standard regimen of epidural analgesia) after total hip arthroplasty.
Length of Hospital Stay, an expected average of 3 days
Study Arms (2)
Peri-Articular Injection
EXPERIMENTALEpidural Patient Controlled Analgesia (Epidural PCA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Use of a different analgesic protocol, based on a peri-articular injection
Epidural analgesia pathway.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with osteoarthritis scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty with a participating surgeon
- Age 50 to 80 years old
- Planned use of regional anesthesia
- Ability to follow study protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 50 years old and older than 80
- Patients intending to receive general anesthesia
- Allergy or intolerance to one of the study medications
- Patients with an ASA of IV
- Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes
- Patients with hepatic (liver) failure
- Patients with chronic renal (kidney) failure
- Chronic opioid use (taking opioids for longer than 3 months)
- Patients with any prior major ipsilateral hip surgery
- Allergy to any of the medications (or adhesives) involved in the protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kethy Jules-Elysee, MD
- Organization
- Hospital for Special Surgery
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kethy M Jules-Elysee, MD
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2012
First Posted
August 6, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 14, 2022
Results First Posted
May 10, 2016
Record last verified: 2022-04