Progressive Rehabilitation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
PROG
2 other identifiers
interventional
185
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a progressive resistance rehabilitation program (PROG) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to a traditional rehabilitation program (TRAD). The investigators hypothesized:
- PROG will result in greater improvements in functional outcome measures such as: stair climbing test (SCT), timed-up-and-go test (TUG), six minute walk test (6MW), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (WOMAC), and knee range of motion (ROM).
- PROG will result in greater improvements in quadriceps muscle strength gains after TKA compared to TRAD.
- PROG will result in greater improvements in muscle mass and central activation compared to TRAD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 11, 2018
October 1, 2018
4.8 years
August 26, 2011
October 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in Stair climbing test (SCT)
Time to ascend and descend one flight of stairs
pre operatively (average of two weeks before surgery), change from baseline at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from baseline in Timed-up-and-go Test (TUG)
pre operatively (average of two weeks before surgery), change from baseline at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline in 6-minute walk test (6MW)
pre operatively (average of two weeks before surgery), change from baseline at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline in muscle strength
pre operatively (average of two weeks before surgery), change from baseline at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline in self-reported health status
pre operatively (average of two weeks before surgery), change from baseline at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline in muscle activation
pre operatively (average of two weeks before surgery), change from baseline at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Progressive Treatment
EXPERIMENTALProgressive intervention will involve the early initiation of intensive rehabilitation using progressive exercise and faster progression to functional strengthening exercises.
Traditional treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraditional intervention represents the synthesis of previously published total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation programs.
Interventions
After total knee arthroplasty, patients will be assigned to an outpatient rehabilitation clinic, based upon geography. Patients will be enrolled randomly into one of two rehabilitation programs (PROG or TRAD). Both rehabilitation programs will take place over 12 weeks. Both groups will receive treatment for range of motion, activities of daily living and gait training, as well as a home exercise program.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- undergoing a primary, unilateral knee arthroplasty
- body mass index \< 40 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- severe contralateral leg OA (\< 5/10 pain with stair climbing) or other unstable orthopaedic conditions that limit function
- neurological conditions that affect muscle function
- vascular or cardiac problems that limit function
- uncontrolled diabetes
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Related Publications (2)
Bade M, Struessel T, Paxton R, Winters J, Baym C, Stevens-Lapsley J. Performance on a Clinical Quadriceps Activation Battery Is Related to a Laboratory Measure of Activation and Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
PMID: 28864244DERIVEDBade MJ, Struessel T, Dayton M, Foran J, Kim RH, Miner T, Wolfe P, Kohrt WM, Dennis D, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Early High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Sep;69(9):1360-1368. doi: 10.1002/acr.23139. Epub 2017 Aug 13.
PMID: 27813347DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley, MPT, PHD
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2011
First Posted
February 23, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10