Comparison of a Tacrolimus Hexal® Based Regimen Versus a Prograf® Based Regimen in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients
Spartacus
Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Investigating a Tacrolimus Hexal® Based Regimen Versus a Prograf® Based Regimen in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to investigate if Tacrolimus Hexal® has similar pharmacokinetic properties compared to Prograf® in de novo renal transplant patients and whether the comparable exposure resulted in similar renal function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2012
Typical duration for phase_4
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 17, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 17, 2019
CompletedJune 17, 2019
November 1, 2017
2.8 years
July 20, 2012
August 19, 2016
March 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
ANCOVA Model for Change in Nankivell GFR (mL/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values (Full Analysis Set)
Change in Nankivell glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline to 6 months Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): The GFR is the best clinical estimate of renal function in health and disease, and correlates well with the clinical severity of renal function disturbances. Several studies have shown that in patients with progressive renal disease, GFR declines or reciprocal serum creatinine levels elevate linearly over time in a predictable manner. With the help of the serum creatinine values, the GFR was calculated via Nankivell formula.
baseline to month 6
ANOVA for Dose-normalized Tacrolimus 12-h-AUC (h/103*L) at Month 1
Compares the PK of Tacrolimus Hexal® assessed by the ratio of the AUC0-12h over one month period post transplantation vs. Prograf® in renal transplant patients
end of month 1
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss and Death Until Month 12 (Full Analysis Set) (Full Analysis Set)
baseline to month 12
ANCOVA Model for Change in CKD-EPI GFR (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Glomerular Filtration Rate) at Month 6 Post-transplantation
baseline to Month 6
ANCOVA Model for Change in MDRD GFR (ml/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values
least square (LS) mean change from baseline to Month 6
ANCOVA Model for Change in Cockcroft-Gault GFR (ml/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values
least square (LS) mean change from baseline to Month 6
Study Arms (2)
Prograf
EXPERIMENTALControl therapy: one capsule containing 0.5 mg, 1mg or 5mg Prograf®, one tablet containing 180mg or 360mg Myfortic®, corticosteroids and one vial containing 20mg lyophilisate Simulect®
Tacroliums Hexal
EXPERIMENTALInvestigational therapy: one capsule containing 0.5mg, 1mg or 5mg Tacrolimus Hexal®, one tablet containing 180mg or 360mg Myfortic®, corticosteroids and one vial containing 20mg lyophilisate Simulect®
Interventions
Prograf® capsules were supplied as capsules of 0.5 mg, 1 mg and 1.5 mg dose strengths.
Tacrolimus Hexal® capsules were supplied to the investigators at dose strengths of 0.5 mg, 1 mg and 1.5 mg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- primary or sec. kidney transplanted patiens, written consent, cold ischemia \< 24 h
You may not qualify if:
- multi organ, immunological risc pts., PRA \>20%, Antibodys against HLA-type of donor organ, hypersensitivity against Tacro or MMF,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10098, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bochum, 44892, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaiserslautern, 67655, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Koeln-Merheim, 51109, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1 patient was randomized to Prograf but didn't get treatment and was excluded from efficacy analyses but kept for safety reporting. Phase 2 was not started due to high drop-out rate. 73 enrolled; 43 of the planned 54 were available for PK analysis
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2012
First Posted
July 25, 2012
Study Start
October 17, 2012
Primary Completion
August 20, 2015
Study Completion
August 20, 2015
Last Updated
June 17, 2019
Results First Posted
June 17, 2019
Record last verified: 2017-11