Sleep Self-Regulation Using Mental Imagery
Using Mental Imagery to Deliver Self-Regulation Techniques That Target Sleep Initiation Behaviors and Pre-Sleep Arousal
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomised controlled trial assessed the efficacy of four mental imagery techniques for improving sleep and its related behaviour: (1) imagery focused on reducing arousal levels; (2) imagery incorporating implementation intentions (a strategy designed to link specified behaviour with the anticipated context) for sleep-related behaviour; (3) a combination of imagery using arousal reduction and implementation intention strategies; or (4) a condition where participants were asked to imagine their typical post work activities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2012
CompletedJuly 24, 2012
July 1, 2012
1.5 years
July 18, 2012
July 19, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sleep Quality
Assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al, 1989).The PSQI includes 19 items that assess sleep quality, hours of sleep, sleep onset length, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of medication and daytime. Item ratings are recoded and combined to form seven component scores. These scores are then summed into a global score ranging from 0(no difficulty) to 21(severe difficulties in all areas). Daily sleep quality was assessed with five PSQI items.
Baseline and at 3 weeks. Data will also be presented for every day for the duration of the 3 week period so change can be reported.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Negative Sleep Habits
Baseline and Final follow-up (at 21-days)
Sleep Efficacy
Baseline and final follow-up (at 21 days)
Pre-Sleep Arousal
Baseline and final follow-up (Day 21)
Imagery Adherence
Post-session, Daily, Final follow-up (21 days)
Action Planning
Baseline, Final follow-up (Day 21)
Study Arms (4)
Arousal reduction using guided imagery
ACTIVE COMPARATORSleep Self-Regulation Using Mental Imagery: Participants in the arousal reduction condition were instructed to imagine wearing a backpack loaded with their worries, then putting the heavy backpack down, and then experiencing the relief and freedom from tension.
Mental simulation of sleep behavior
ACTIVE COMPARATORSleep Self-Regulation Using Mental Imagery: Participants in this condition received instructions to visualize a specific behavioral plan designed to meet the goal of obtaining quality sleep each night through the practice of certain behaviors. To form the behavioral plan, participants visualised changing into comfortable clothes and taking time to relax prior to going to bed, the time they planned to go to sleep, where they planned to sleep, and the bedtime routine they follow to help them to get to sleep. At bedtime, they were instructed to mentally run through a checklist of these behaviors and then do any behaviors that they had not yet completed.
Combination
ACTIVE COMPARATORSleep Self-Regulation Using Mental Imagery: Participants in this condition were asked to practice a combination of the guided imagery (for relaxation) and mental simulation imagery for sleep-related behaviour
Control
SHAM COMPARATORSleep Self-Regulation Using Mental Imagery: Participants in this condition were asked to imagine a typical post work activity
Interventions
Comparison of two forms of mental imagery to instigate behaviors that assist in the sleeping process
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ability to read and write in English;
- full-time employment;
- work shifts during daytime hours (i.e., participants were excluded if they worked night shifts either through the organization or through a secondary job) in a position that provided daily access to email;
- a score of five or greater on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI) which indicates at least moderate difficulties in two or more areas (e.g., sleep quality and daytime dysfunction);
You may not qualify if:
- An identifiable biological cause of current sleep deprivation (e.g., sleep apnoea, narcolepsy, restless leg syndrome, periodic limb movement disorder, or pregnancy)
- An identified psychological disorder
- Caring for a child under the age of 5 or have a reason outside of work that caused them to regularly lack sleep.
- Incomplete data (over 50% of daily data missing or missing final follow-up assessment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
10 Private Businesses in the Region
Auckland, New Zealand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marisa H Loft, PhD
Monash University (Sunway Campus, Malaysia)
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Linda D Cameron, PhD
University of California, Merced
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2012
First Posted
July 24, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 24, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07