To Compare Cemented Versus Screw-retained Implant-supported Single Crowns With Customized Zirconia Abutments
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Cemented Versus Screw-retained Implant-supported Single Crowns With Customized Zirconia Abutments
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to test whether or not the use of screw-retained implant crowns on customized zirconia abutments results in biological, technical and esthetic outcomes similar to those obtained with cemented all-ceramic crowns on customized zirconia abutments, both made with a computer-aided design and manufacturing procedure (CAD/CAM). The null-hypotheses is that marginal bone level change is equal at screw-retained and cemented crowns
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 11, 2019
CompletedNovember 6, 2020
November 1, 2020
7.3 years
July 9, 2012
November 4, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Marginal bone level
The bone level represents an indicator of the osseointegration and biological success of the implant.
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
up to 5 years
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
up to 5 years
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
up to 5 years
Biological, technical and esthetic outcome
up to 5 years
Study Arms (2)
Cemented single crowns
ACTIVE COMPARATORCemented single crown: zirconia abutment (Straumann Cares abutment) with an all-ceramic lithium disilicate crown
Screw-retained single crown
ACTIVE COMPARATORScrew-retained single crown: zirconia abutment (Straumann Cares abutment), directly veneered with veneering ceramic
Interventions
The final lithium disilicate crowns will be cemented with an adhesive cement after tightening the abutments with the torque indicated by the manufacturer and closing the screw access hole with white guttapercha. The abutment will be cleaned with ethanol. A retraction cord will be placed for cementation if indicated. The crown will be etched with hydrofluoric acid and subsequently silanized. A sufficient amount of cement will be filled in the crown without creating major excesses. When the crown is seated correctly, the cement will be light-cured for a few seconds to facilitate the removal of the now hard excess cement. \- Excess cement will be meticulously removed with a carbon scaler. The removal of all excess cement will be checked with an X-ray and by visual and tactile inspection.
The screw-retained crowns will be inserted and tightened with the torque indicated by the manufacturer. The screw access hole will to be closed with white guttapercha and a composite filling (Filtek, 3M ESPE).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Single-tooth Straumann Bone Level in the anterior maxilla or mandible
- At least one adjacent natural tooth present
- Implant position enabling both screw-retained and cemented crown
- Informed consent signed
You may not qualify if:
- Smoking more than 15 cigarettes a day
- Poor oral hygiene (Plaque index over 30%)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry
Zurich, 8032, Switzerland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Thoma, Prof. Dr.
Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2012
First Posted
July 19, 2012
Study Start
July 27, 2012
Primary Completion
November 11, 2019
Study Completion
November 11, 2019
Last Updated
November 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11