Markers of Alzheimers Disease After Propofol or Isoflurane Anesthesia
MAD-PIA
The Effect of Isoflurane Versus Propofol Anesthesia on Alzheimers Disease CSF Markers
1 other identifier
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous work in animal models suggests that inhalational anesthetic agents may accelerate Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis, but it is unclear to what extent this may happen in humans. Here, the investigators propose to measure Alzheimer's disease-related neural markers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients exposed to anesthesia while undergoing neurosurgical procedures that require lumbar drain placement. Patients will be randomized to either receive inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane or intravenous anesthesia with propofol. CSF and blood samples will each be collected at the induction of anesthesia, and then again ten and twenty-four hours later. CSF samples will be assayed for amyloid beta, tau, and other Alzheimer's disease-associated markers; blood samples will be assayed for serum inflammatory markers and used for genotyping studies. These studies should clarify the effect of common anesthetic agents on Alzheimer's disease related neural markers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Mar 2012
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 4, 2015
March 1, 2015
3 years
June 20, 2012
August 3, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ratio of cerebrospinal fluid tau to amyloid beta
twenty four hours after the induction of anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (8)
the relationship between anesthetic exposure and CSF biomarker changes
up to 24 hrs after induction of anesthesia
the relationship between anesthetic exposure and CSF biomarker changes, and demographics (age, gender, and race)
up to 24 hrs after induction of anesthesia
the relationship between CSF biomarker changes and serum markers of metabolic and/or inflammatory status
up to 24 hrs after induction of anesthesia
the relationship between anesthetic exposure and biomarker changes and serum markers of metabolic and/or inflammatory status
up to 24 hrs after induction of anesthesia
the relationship between anesthetic exposure and biomarker changes and neuroimaging results obtained as dictated by routine standard of care
up to 24 hours after induction of anesthesia
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Propofol based intravenous anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients will receive propofol based intravenous anesthesia
Isoflurane Based Inhaled Anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALpatients will receive isoflurane based inhaled anesthesia
Interventions
patients randomized to the propofol arm of the study will receive general anesthesia with propofol
patients randomized to the isoflurane arm of the study will receive general anesthesia with isoflurane
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18 and above
- seen in neurosurgical clinic, and scheduled for operative aneurysm repair or other neurosurgical procedure necessitating lumbar drain placement.
- ability to speak English.
- ability to understand consent forms, and to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- age less than 18
- lumbar drain is not placed
- not eligible for one of the anesthetics (inhaled isoflurane or IV propofol)
- inmate of a correctional facility (i.e. prisoners).
- pregnancy. Pregnancy is ruled out as standard of care before cranial surgery, based on clinical history and/or HCG testing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27709, United States
Related Publications (2)
Berger M, Ponnusamy V, Greene N, Cooter M, Nadler JW, Friedman A, McDonagh DL, Laskowitz DT, Newman MF, Shaw LM, Warner DS, Mathew JP, James ML; MAD-PIA Investigators. The Effect of Propofol vs. Isoflurane Anesthesia on Postoperative Changes in Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytokine Levels: Results from a Randomized Trial. Front Immunol. 2017 Nov 13;8:1528. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01528. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29181002DERIVEDBerger M, Nadler JW, Friedman A, McDonagh DL, Bennett ER, Cooter M, Qi W, Laskowitz DT, Ponnusamy V, Newman MF, Shaw LM, Warner DS, Mathew JP, James ML; MAD-PIA trial team. The Effect of Propofol Versus Isoflurane Anesthesia on Human Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers of Alzheimer's Disease: Results of a Randomized Trial. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Apr 15;52(4):1299-310. doi: 10.3233/JAD-151190.
PMID: 27079717DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miles Berger, MD, PhD
Duke University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael L James, MD
Duke University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David McDonagh, MD
Duke University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2012
First Posted
July 13, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03