Hepatic Xenetix-CT Perfusion
Diagnostic Contribution of XENETIX® CT PERFUSION in Pre-therapeutical Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
96
4 countries
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the diagnostic value of Xenetix-CT perfusion for the discrimination between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and poorly/moderately differentiated HCC, in histo-pathologically proven HCC, and with the aim to cover the entire liver.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Apr 2012
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 13, 2017
CompletedJuly 13, 2017
July 1, 2017
2.5 years
July 6, 2012
December 16, 2016
July 11, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Blood Volume (BV) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Flow (BF) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Permeability Surface (PS) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Arterial Liver Perfusion (ALP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Portal Venous Liver Perfusion (PVP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Total Liver Perfusion (TLP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Hepatic Perfusion Index (HPI) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Volume According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase)
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
CT perfusion
EXPERIMENTALarm with CT perfusion
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects diagnosed for HCC and planned for surgery (lobectomy or transplantation) within a timeframe of 30 days between first imaging procedure used for the study and surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Guerbetlead
Study Sites (5)
AKH
Vienna, Austria
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Germany
SMC
Seoul, South Korea
SNUH
Seoul, South Korea
Zurich University Hospital
Zurich, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Corinne Dubourdieu, PharmD, Head of Clinical Projects and Medical Writing
- Organization
- Guerbet
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hatem Alkadhi
Zurich University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2012
First Posted
July 13, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 13, 2017
Results First Posted
July 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07