Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will be comparing the patients overall satisfaction of two different meshes used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 1, 2012
July 1, 2012
1 year
July 9, 2012
July 31, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain
Subjective pain scale rating post surgical
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
return to activities of daily living
1 year
Study Arms (2)
heavy weight mesh
Surgipro mesh is a heavier weighted mesh with less flexibility after surgery
light weight mesh
UltraPro mesh is a lighter weighted mesh with theoretically less stiffness and more flexibility compared to heavier weighted meshes
Eligibility Criteria
Patients over the age of 18 who are undergoing a unilateral repair of inguinal hernias laparoscopically
You may qualify if:
- over the age of 18
- unilateral side to be repaired
- no major abdominal surgery previously
You may not qualify if:
- under age 18
- bilateral repairs undertaken
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ascension Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
GenesysRMC
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam P Pentel, DO
Ascension Health
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DO, general surgery resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2012
First Posted
July 11, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 1, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07