Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Hemiparesis
tDCS
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this proposal is to investigate the safety of use of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)in children with hemiparesis. The research question, "Is transcranial Direct Current Stimulation safe for use in children with congenital hemiparesis?" relates to two hypotheses:
- 1.tDCS will not produce a major adverse event, including seizure activity.
- 2.No change in paretic or nonparetic hand function or cognitive status will occur.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
Started Jul 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 20, 2015
CompletedNovember 9, 2015
October 1, 2015
1.1 years
June 11, 2012
June 22, 2015
October 7, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adverse Events/Safety Assessment.
Assessment of safety of use of tDCS in children with hemiparesis through vital signs, physician evaluation, subject report of symptoms. Reported are the number of participants who met the following criteria: 1. Vital Signs (either resting blood pressure or heart rate)- Any greater than 2SD of change in vital signs from pretest to posttest. 2. Physician Evaluation- Child identified as declining in function from pretest to posttest. 3. Subject Report of Symptoms- Reports of serious adverse event/symptoms from pretest to posttest. Detailed adverse events are reported in the adverse events module.
Baseline, Posttest, Follow-Up Session at One-Week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Hand Function Decline as Measured by Number of Participants
Baseline, Posttest, Follow-Up Session at One-Week
Study Arms (2)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALReceiving active tDCS
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORtDCS equipment set to placebo setting.
Interventions
transcranial direct current stimulation- non-invasive brain stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Congenital Hemiparesis confirmed by most recent MRI or CT radiologic report.
- Hemispheric Stroke or Periventricular Leukomalacia
- Ages 8-17 years old
- ≥ 10 degrees of active motion at the metacarpophalangeal joint
- Adequate receptive language function to follow two-step commands as evidenced by performance on TOKEN test of intelligence
- No evidence of seizure activity within the last 2 years.
- Subject is able to give informed assent and providing a signature, along with the informed consent signature of the legal guardian as evidenced by signature.
You may not qualify if:
- Metabolic Disorders
- Neoplasm
- Epilepsy
- Disorders of Cellular Migration and Proliferation
- Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury
- Expressive Aphasia
- Pregnancy
- Indwelling metal or incompatible medical devices
- Evidence of skin disease or skin abnormalities
- Botulinum toxin or phenol intramuscular block within the one-month preceding tDCS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Minnesotalead
- Minnesota Medical Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gillick BT, Feyma T, Menk J, Usset M, Vaith A, Wood TJ, Worthington R, Krach LE. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric hemiparesis: randomized controlled preliminary study. Phys Ther. 2015 Mar;95(3):337-49. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130565. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PMID: 25413621RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Bernadette Gillick
- Organization
- University of Minnesota
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernadette Gillick, PhD, MS, PT
University of Minnesota
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2012
First Posted
July 10, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 9, 2015
Results First Posted
July 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10